On Friday, July 31, 2015 5:00:43 PM PDT, Daniel Phillips wrote:
Note: Hirofumi's email is clear, logical and speaks to the
question. This branch of the thread is largely pointless, though
it essentially says the same thing in non-technical terms. Perhaps
your next response should be to Hirofumi,
Returning ENOSPC when you have free space you can't yet prove is safer than
not returning it and risking a data loss when you get hit by a write/commit
storm. :)
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:44 PM, OGAWA Hirofumi hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp
wrote:
Jan Kara j...@suse.cz writes:
Yes, if
On Friday, July 31, 2015 11:29:51 AM PDT, David Lang wrote:
If you define this as loosing our mojo, then yes we have.
A pity. There remains so much to do that simply will not get
done in the absence of mojo.
Regards,
Daniel
___
Tux3 mailing list
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015, Daniel Phillips wrote:
Subject: Re: [FYI] tux3: Core changes
On Friday, July 31, 2015 8:37:35 AM PDT, Raymond Jennings wrote:
Returning ENOSPC when you have free space you can't yet prove is safer than
not returning it and risking a data loss when you get hit by a
On Friday, July 31, 2015 11:29:51 AM PDT, David Lang wrote:
We, the Linux Community have less tolerance for losing people's
data and preventing them from operating than we used to when it
was all tinkerer's personal data and secondary systems.
So rather than pushing optimizations out to
On Friday, July 31, 2015 3:27:12 PM PDT, David Lang wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015, Daniel Phillips wrote:
On Friday, July 31, 2015 11:29:51 AM PDT, David Lang wrote: ...
you weren't asking about any particular feature of Tux, you
were asking if we were still willing to push out stuff that
On Friday, July 31, 2015 11:29:51 AM PDT, David Lang wrote:
We, the Linux Community have less tolerance for losing people's data and
preventing them from operating than we used to when it was all tinkerer's
personal data and secondary systems.
So rather than pushing optimizations out to
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015, Daniel Phillips wrote:
On Friday, July 31, 2015 11:29:51 AM PDT, David Lang wrote:
We, the Linux Community have less tolerance for losing people's data and
preventing them from operating than we used to when it was all tinkerer's
personal data and secondary systems.
So
