Re: [Tuxpaint-dev] anybody try it?

2005-01-18 Thread Bill Kendrick
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 10:07:48PM -0500, Albert Cahalan wrote: Do the threads work OK on x86, Windows, MacOS X...? My system loaded it and reported: 53.323 (with stamps) 5.329(without) For maximum effect, compare threaded and non-threaded, and use the --nostamps option.

Re: [Tuxpaint-dev] anybody try it?

2005-01-18 Thread Bill Kendrick
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:04:13AM -0800, Bill Kendrick wrote: 5.329(without) Oh, well, now I can see why. If I actually go in and CLICK the 'Text' tool, I see that I've only got 5 fonts available, not the tons I had before. :^) What's up? -bill!

Re: [Tuxpaint-dev] anybody try it?

2005-01-18 Thread Albert Cahalan
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 04:18, Bill Kendrick wrote: On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 01:04:13AM -0800, Bill Kendrick wrote: 5.329(without) Oh, well, now I can see why. If I actually go in and CLICK the 'Text' tool, I see that I've only got 5 fonts available, not the tons I had before. :^)

[Tuxpaint-dev] anybody try it?

2005-01-17 Thread Albert Cahalan
Do the threads work OK on x86, Windows, MacOS X...? For maximum effect, compare threaded and non-threaded, and use the --nostamps option. ___ Tuxpaint-dev mailing list Tuxpaint-dev@tux4kids.net http://tux4kids.net/mailman/listinfo/tuxpaint-dev