pril 25, 2024 4:49 PM
> *To:* tvornottv@googlegroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: New York appeals court torn over
> reversing Weinstein convictoin
>
> I agree with the Court of Appeals, but I don’t think the fault lies with
> the NY Prosecutors, but the trial judge. Even then,
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2024 4:49 PM
To: tvornottv@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TV orNotTV] Re: New York appeals court torn over reversing
Weinstein convictoin
I agree with the Court of Appeals, but I don’t think the fault lies with the NY
Prosecutors, but the trial judge. Even
Yeah, the appellate court made the only decision they could make, and the
trial judge allowed the stupidity, but the prosecution never should have
done it.
Kevin M. (RPCV)
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 4:49 PM PGage wrote:
> I agree with the Court of Appeals, but I don’t think the fault lies with
>
I agree with the Court of Appeals, but I don’t think the fault lies with
the NY Prosecutors, but the trial judge. Even then, it was a close call,
and the Appeals court was closely and bitterly divided. I do think when
things are that close the decision should be in favor of the defendant.
Could somebody get the NY prosecutors a refresher course in proper
courtroom procedure? Either that or make them wear shirts in public with
the words “I help sexual predators get out of prison” printed on them?
Kevin M. (RPCV)
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 2:48 PM 'Bob Jersey' via TVorNotTV <
"Front page" at V... the panel ruled 4-3 for Weinstein, finding that the NY
judge prejudicially allowed women to testify about allegations that weren't
in the original case (he remains jailed, as an appeal is planned)... the
issue of "prior bad acts" also led to the overturning of Bill Cosby's
