RE: [TV orNotTV] Cable nets fixin' to shed the dead weight

2017-03-22 Thread Brad Beam
-Original Message- From: tvornottv@googlegroups.com [mailto:tvornottv@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steve Timko >A la carte channel selection would fix a lot of this. Cable companies want to >push channels they have investment in. Everyone who uses DirecTV subsidizes >their sports

Re: [TV orNotTV] Cable nets fixin' to shed the dead weight

2017-03-22 Thread Steve Timko
A la carte channel selection would fix a lot of this. Cable companies want to push channels they have investment in. Everyone who uses DirecTV subsidizes their sports package even if they never tune in a football game or a NASCAR race. I think some of the more obscure channels would thrive with a

Re: [TV orNotTV] Cable nets fixin' to shed the dead weight

2017-03-22 Thread David Lynch
At least for the niches I fit into, it never felt to me like the corporate owners never really tried to research their audience beyond getting broad stereotypes and reruns of non-niche programming that their niche enjoys. To follow the bookstore analogy, Reading the program guide for Logo always

Re: [TV orNotTV] Cable nets fixin' to shed the dead weight

2017-03-21 Thread Kevin M.
I still take umbrage with this concept. When we were promised "500 channels" back in the 1990s, we were led to believe there would be channels for niche audiences... that every channel did not need to pander to get every possible viewer. Cut to the present day, and gone are channels devoted to