Hi Brendan,
found out how? references? or merely observed per the link? It's
curious because it might be throwing off my calculated 'coolness
vector' - I noticed the coolness vector of a tweet containing a celebs
name seemed lower than anticipiated - however it wasn't the point of
the experiment,
naw,
i *think* he's talking about mangled shortened URLs.
i had to make my thingy adapt to these, because I noticed stuff like
"http://example.com/R5dEI want to show you this link"
ie, something drops the newline and mashes the Url together. or
something like that. It's an easy cake fix on the sh
are cameras permitted?
thanks,
waitman
On May 1, 1:10 pm, Doug Williams wrote:
> Alex and I will be at 140, The Twitter Conference, on May 26th and 27th.
> Alex is keynoting and I am leading a few developer oriented sessions. If you
> are going to be around the Bay area at the end of May, we
i noticed trouble connecting from some networks but not others.
probably straighten out.
On Apr 28, 4:13 pm, DustyReagan wrote:
> Is anyone else getting the error: Unable to Connect to tcp://twitter.com:80.
> Error #110: Connection timed out
>
> I have to apps on with 2 different white-listed ac
is that really supposed to be "dominoes" (sic) ?
> days ... example: search "dominoes pizza". I searched this on 4/17
Please add me to the list.
Twitter ID: autodrool
Name: Waitman Gobble
Location: Los Altos, California
Site: www.maximumheaddistortion.com
Email: wait...@waitman.net
Developing: www.tangytweets.com
Pet projects and experimentation with possibly no commercial
potential.
Hello,
Thank you for the updates. I have a few questions.
1) Should I use REST instead of the Search API? Will the REST
deprecate the Search soon, or maybe eventually, or "no worries" at
this moment?
2) asking the search API for 100 results seems to work, but does not
appear accessible from the
is this issue dead? I've been thinking about it - comments... anyone?
1) "Not" auto-rewriting URLs on input leaves the system susceptible to
various gregarious manipulation. It's currently trivial to get 10,000
visitors a day to click out of twitter and potentially up to 100,000 a
day - fictiona
oh. i suppose i was confused by your example. So I'm not sure why
shortening the URL makes any sense, if 1) I can't send HTML and 2) I
can't send more than 140 to begin with.
from the top of my head, the only thing that makes sense to me
regarding URL shortening done on the receiving end of the me
hmmm i'm pecking around on my cell phone and send a message 'http://example.com/";>foo' and have example.com shortened?
i'm still stuck on the SMS limit, i think
On Apr 3, 11:07 am, Chad Etzel wrote:
> Huh? It makes total sense to do this. As far as hyperlinks are
> concerned (on normal
I think the thing shouldn't mess with the post anyway, it seems
prudent to preserve the integrity of the original post instead of
manipulating it - snip, snip. If we were here posting novels all day,
I say the desire for automatic machine-abridged versions is arguable.
And I think it goes into th
11 matches
Mail list logo
