[twitter-dev] Re: Either destroy is/was failing, or my understanding of destroy is/was failing

2009-09-02 Thread John Kalucki
There's a note on the Status blog that we're having some delays in processing a proportion of new statuses. This issue looks to largely be resolved, and all the subsequent backlogs have been processed -- except there's still a bit of a backlog pushing statuses to Facebook that should resolve soon

[twitter-dev] Re: Either destroy is/was failing, or my understanding of destroy is/was failing

2009-09-02 Thread Kevin Mesiab
Pushing statuses to Facebook ? can you clarify this? On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:25 AM, John Kaluckijkalu...@gmail.com wrote: There's a note on the Status blog that we're having some delays in processing a proportion of new statuses. This issue looks to largely be resolved, and all the

[twitter-dev] Re: Either destroy is/was failing, or my understanding of destroy is/was failing

2009-09-02 Thread John Kalucki
We optionally push your statuses to Facebook to allow you to update your Facebook status automatically. This has been supported for about 14+ months. -John On Sep 2, 4:16 pm, Kevin Mesiab ke...@mesiablabs.com wrote: Pushing statuses to Facebook ? can you clarify this? On Wed, Sep 2,

[twitter-dev] Re: Either destroy is/was failing, or my understanding of destroy is/was failing

2009-09-02 Thread Alex Payne
We've got a fix for this going out tomorrow. On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 09:38, Ted Newardted.new...@gmail.com wrote: I’ve been hacking on the Twitter API, and I’m running into some serious weirdness with destroy. I post a message: C:\ curl -u name:pass -d status=Testing