I thought the new terms sorted this out
Get each user's consent before sending Tweets or other messages on
their behalf. A user authenticating with your application does not
constitute consent to send a message.
On Oct 9, 10:22 am, Sam Street sam...@gmail.com wrote:
Please don't forget the Ive
Nalin, I appreciate the ideas. Remember, you can’t DM somebody who
isn’t following you. I want to maintain a fairly complete collection
of filters for the common “noise tweets,” and use it in TalkingPuffin
under user control, and invite other application developers to use it
as well.
Maybe as
Regex isn't that tough, but it IS one of those things you need to get
into the rhythm of, and it's very easy to fall out. Every time I
heavily dive back in though, after lots of frustration, you eventually
end up with a lot of elegance and power.
∞ Andy Badera
∞ +1 518-641-1280
∞ This email is:
also , there should be a way for people whose tweets are wrongly
marked as spam to remove their reg -exes from the system- and the
system can perhaps send a direct message to sender for every 100 or so
noise tweets blocked.
Just a thought..
N. S
On 10/14/09, Dave Briccetti da...@davebsoft.com
A Twitter client can do an HTTP get to here:
http://talkingpuffin.appspot.com/filters/noise
and expect lines of plain text like this:
Just joined a twibe. Visit http\://twibes\.com/.*
just joined a video chat at http\://tinychat\.com.*
Please submit your candidate “noise tweets”:
http://bit.ly/NoiseTweets
I’ll review them and add them to the repository.
These should generally be messages of the type of viral advertising—
some service doing something for a Twitter user and then blabbing
about it through the careless or
Please don't forget the Ive just taken the 'WHOSE HOTTER' quiz and
voted for Miley fucking Cyrus spam via @reply (and DM also)
On Oct 9, 7:03 am, Dave Briccetti da...@davebsoft.com wrote:
A Twitter client can do an HTTP get to here:
http://talkingpuffin.appspot.com/filters/noise
and expect
ps. thats not the actual string. I'll paste actual noise here as I
discover it though
On Oct 9, 10:22 am, Sam Street sam...@gmail.com wrote:
Please don't forget the Ive just taken the 'WHOSE HOTTER' quiz and
voted for Miley fucking Cyrus spam via @reply (and DM also)
On Oct 9, 7:03 am, Dave
Don't paste them here. Please go to the link he posted above. Pasting them
here would be, in effect, noise.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 03:22, Sam Street sam...@gmail.com wrote:
ps. thats not the actual string. I'll paste actual noise here as I
discover it though
On Oct 9, 10:22 am, Sam Street
To add a bit more usefulness to this, I'd suggest adding some sort of
Bayesian filter and domain white/black listing.
Just my 2 cents. Great idea though.
On Oct 9, 9:40 am, JDG ghil...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't paste them here. Please go to the link he posted above. Pasting them
here would be,
Participating Twitter clients could have a “Noise” button to submit
the tweet being read as a candidate for inclusion in the filtering.
I think it might be a better idea to publish the regex code somewhere,
so that developers can directly include it in their apps if they want
to.
If you provide a web service, can I send my users to your email
address or support system if your regexs reject their tweets as false
positives? ;-)
I
It's a nice idea. I'd go ahead with it - but also release the regex
publicly.
Apps make enough external requests as it is
On Oct 9, 12:14 am, Dewald Pretorius dpr...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it might be a better idea to publish the regex code somewhere,
so that developers can directly include
This is something very useful.
At Twaller.com we use filtering based on dictionary words, these words
include http, www, com etc. and also abusive words. However the lists
of such words keeps on growing and recently we have also added RT to
it since there are too many retweets which dont add
14 matches
Mail list logo
