[twitter-dev] Re: Protected Resources requests need not be signed by the Consumer secret?

2009-07-28 Thread Duane Roelands
I've been using both consumer keys to sign all of my requests from day one. I still think the issue is related to URL encoding somehow, because I can successfully post tweets if they don't contain troublesome characters (apostrophe, for example). But, so long as Twitter remains silent, we'll

[twitter-dev] Re: Protected Resources requests need not be signed by the Consumer secret?

2009-07-28 Thread srikanth reddy
I dont think you got my point. Whether you were signing using both secrets or one secret doesnt matter because twitter wasnt verifying signature at all. Now they have fixed this and all your protected service requests must be signed by both secrets. My problem is how to protect the consumer

[twitter-dev] Re: Protected Resources requests need not be signed by the Consumer secret?

2009-07-28 Thread Duane Roelands
I have the same issue with my application. Desktop apps are forced to either embed the consumer keys in source code or construct some sort of elaborate server mechanism. There's no good answer here. When my application approaches 1.0 release, I'll probably use Dotfuscator or something similar