I'd like to also voice my agreement with Chad here, if you're
specifically wanting to follow someone/thing you should get it. I
agree with filtering in search, but in this case you are purposefully
stating you wish to follow someones updates, and the result should
reflect that, regardless of how
There are multiple bits set for accounts that control various levels
of access and all kinds of folderol. It's complicated and for mostly
understandable reasons, purposefully opaque. Search and Hosebird
currently have identical access rules, but that's subject to change.
In this case, it appears
Ok, at least that confirms my suspicions about why those updates were
not being delivered.
If I may make an argument to separate the policy between Search and
Hosebird (at least for the /follow methods)...
In the case of the /follow methods (as opposed to the unfiltered
/(fire|garden)hose
A very good point. I'll take this up with product.
On Jun 5, 10:58 am, Chad Etzel jazzyc...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, at least that confirms my suspicions about why those updates were
not being delivered.
If I may make an argument to separate the policy between Search and
Hosebird (at least for
