Re: [twitter-dev] Confused about OAuth 1.0 vs 1.0a and Twitter API docs

Ah, sorry, my mistake. -M On Jan 22, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Abraham Williams wrote: > http://github.com/abraham/twitteroauth/ supports oauth_varifier. > > Abraham > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 13:40, Marc Hedlund wrote: > Yup, I know, that's what I'm asking. Why not link to and tell people to use >

Re: [twitter-dev] Confused about OAuth 1.0 vs 1.0a and Twitter API docs

http://github.com/abraham/twitteroauth/ supports oauth_varifier. Abraham On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 13:40, Marc Hedlund wrote: > Yup, I know, that's what I'm asking. Why not link to and tell people to use > 1.0a (or the IETF draft) rather than 1.0? > > For the record I checked all the other code e

Re: [twitter-dev] Confused about OAuth 1.0 vs 1.0a and Twitter API docs

most likely, Twitter has other things to do and updating the API documentation isn't very high on the list. Ryan On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Marc Hedlund wrote: > Yup, I know, that's what I'm asking. Why not link to and tell people to use > 1.0a (or the IETF draft) rather than 1.0? > > For

Re: [twitter-dev] Confused about OAuth 1.0 vs 1.0a and Twitter API docs

Yup, I know, that's what I'm asking. Why not link to and tell people to use 1.0a (or the IETF draft) rather than 1.0? For the record I checked all the other code examples and none of them support oauth_verifier (some do send oauth_callback with the first request), unless I'm missing something.

Re: [twitter-dev] Confused about OAuth 1.0 vs 1.0a and Twitter API docs

If you look at the very top of the 1.0 spec, you will see a yellow box... "This specification was obsoleted by OAuth Core 1.0 Revision A on June 24th, 2009 to address a session fixation attack. The OAuth Core 1.0 Revision A specifica