the only possible reasons someone would have to create that many accounts
would be to spam in one form or another. There should be other ways to skin
that cat.. You could not keep up with that many accounts unless you sent
out huge amounts of useless RSS feeeds just to gain followers so you can
m
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Andrew Badera wrote:
> I would point them to examples of other apps (local news spammers come
> to mind) that have recently been blacklisted.
Thank you I'll do that. Any links you know off the top of your head?
> That aside, I for one am 100% opposed to giving any
of their high profile clients and expect many of the real people
to be new to Twitter.
>> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 06:03:17 -0700
>> From: john.l.me...@gmail.com
>> To: twitter-development-talk@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: [twitter-dev] Mass account creation
>>
>>
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:03 PM, John Meyer wrote:
> Sounds like a swit (spam twitterer) to me. Have you told them about
> twitter's blacklisting policy?
That was my initial reaction. :)
> On 1/7/2010 5:50 AM, Jonathan Markwell wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Would be interested to hear both the comm
I would point them to examples of other apps (local news spammers come
to mind) that have recently been blacklisted.
That aside, I for one am 100% opposed to giving anyone this sort of
tool. Not that certain other people on this list haven't already done
so for profit, sadly.
∞ Andy Badera
∞ +1 5
I can't wait to hear how they plan to interest real people to follow these
accounts. More keyword- (or geo-) based @ "replies"? save us!
> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 06:03:17 -0700
> From: john.l.me...@gmail.com
> To: twitter-development-talk@googlegroups.com
> Subj
Sounds like a swit (spam twitterer) to me. Have you told them about
twitter's blacklisting policy?
On 1/7/2010 5:50 AM, Jonathan Markwell wrote:
Hi All,
Would be interested to hear both the community's opinion on this and
the official Twitter view.
I have a client that wants to create thou