On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:03 PM, nischalshetty
wrote:
> One of us is crazy here. If I'm not wrong console.log belongs to
> firebug. Which means you will get a javascript error on ALL browsers
> which do not have firebug installed and running.
>
We were going to detect console.log's presence befo
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Damon Clinkscales wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Dan Webb wrote:
>> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Steve C wrote:
> Just wondering...does TwitPic have a bug or misconfiguration or is
> this an @anywhere bug?
Javascript errors at startup time (in
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Dan Webb wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Steve C wrote:
>> We just rolled out @anywhere yesterday and some of our users are
>> experiencing similar issues.
>>
>> http://twitpic.com/1p00d6
>
> We rolled out a fix at the weekend that we fixed all the brow
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Steve C wrote:
> We just rolled out @anywhere yesterday and some of our users are
> experiencing similar issues.
>
> http://twitpic.com/1p00d6
We rolled out a fix at the weekend that we fixed all the browsers that
we test under but there are obviously still some
This does sound like a regression of some kind. We'll get this fixed ASAP.
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 3:41 PM, JohnB wrote:
>
> Are we really talking about incorrect installations here? Twitter's
> own @Anywhere documentation page (http://dev.twitter.com/anywhere/
> begin) is throwing this same err
Chrome has it too.
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 03:20, nischalshetty wrote:
> Isn't console.log() specific to firebug? #JustSaying :)
>
> On May 16, 4:43 am, Larry wrote:
> > Firefox 3.X is a supported browser for @anywhere and my example is
> > properly configured, yet it triggered when it wasn't su
I agree that @Anywhere should degrade gracefully when configured properly on
unsupported platforms and not prompt incorrect alert()s. But I do think
alert()s are probably the best way to notify developers of incorrect
installations.
Abraham
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:55, Larry wrote:
> I can re
