[twsocket] Slightly OT: How many of you agree that 2GB memory limit of 32-bit BDS code is insufficient?
Hello, Just trying to learn how other Borland coders building ICS servers are feeling about it. Best Regards, SZ -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] Performance on the latest ICS V6
I have not testet the performance on many connections. The test I did now was a single download using Internet Explorer as client. The machine I used (for server) is an old Pentium 3. It was not a big difference. I don't remember the filesize, but download takes about 40 seconds. V5 used about 3-4 seconds less on the download than V6. I did not set NO_DEBUG_LOG, this could have somthing to do with it. I will test perfomance on many connections tomorrow. Regards Bjørnar -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno Garrels Sent: 23. februar 2007 18:45 To: ICS support mailing Subject: Re: [twsocket] Performance on the latest ICS V6 Same test in the LAN, same result. Sometimes V6 was a little bit faster, sometimes V5. Overall it looks like V6 was a little bit faster though. But that's just my personal feeling ;-) I used the original Webserv demos from ICS distributions. --- Arno Garrels [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html Arno Garrels wrote: Bjørnar Nielsen wrote: I'm using the latest ICS V6 and testing the THttpSrv-component. I'm doing the test on an old machine to see performance. It seems that the V6 is slower than V5. By that I mean that I get a faster transfer- rate from the server to a client (the same client on both test) with the V5 than with the V6. I compared both versions on a modern PC downloading a 150 MB file with the same IE, client as well as servers on localhost. I couldn't measure any difference, how do you test? --- Arno Garrels [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] Slightly OT: How many of you agree that 2GB
Hello, I'm not sure wether you know it or not, but with the new memory manager and some OS switch /3GB you can now use 3 GB instead of only two which may make the situation bearable just a little bit longer! Greetings Markus -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] Performance on the latest ICS V6
Bjørnar Nielsen wrote: I have not testet the performance on many connections. The test I did now was a single download using Internet Explorer as client. The machine I used (for server) is an old Pentium 3. It was not a big difference. I don't remember the filesize, but download takes about 40 seconds. V5 used about 3-4 seconds less on the download than V6. For a roughly comparison it's important to repeat this test several times. I did not set NO_DEBUG_LOG, this could have somthing to do with it. Ithink that won't speedup things notably _if actually nothing is logged. --- Arno Garrels [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html I will test perfomance on many connections tomorrow. Regards Bjørnar -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arno Garrels Sent: 23. februar 2007 18:45 To: ICS support mailing Subject: Re: [twsocket] Performance on the latest ICS V6 Same test in the LAN, same result. Sometimes V6 was a little bit faster, sometimes V5. Overall it looks like V6 was a little bit faster though. But that's just my personal feeling ;-) I used the original Webserv demos from ICS distributions. --- Arno Garrels [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html Arno Garrels wrote: Bjørnar Nielsen wrote: I'm using the latest ICS V6 and testing the THttpSrv-component. I'm doing the test on an old machine to see performance. It seems that the V6 is slower than V5. By that I mean that I get a faster transfer- rate from the server to a client (the same client on both test) with the V5 than with the V6. I compared both versions on a modern PC downloading a 150 MB file with the same IE, client as well as servers on localhost. I couldn't measure any difference, how do you test? --- Arno Garrels [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] Slightly OT: How many of you agree that 2GB
Markus Humm wrote: Hello, I'm not sure wether you know it or not, but with the new memory manager and some OS switch /3GB you can now use 3 GB instead of only two which may make the situation bearable just a little bit longer! But with the drawback that system space will be reduced from 2 GB to 1 GB. Which means less number of maximum possible sockets, if I remember this stuff correctly. --- Arno Garrels [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
