On Apr 22, 2010, at 5:26 AM, Xavier Mor-Mur wrote:
> Hello to all
>
> [ILINK32 Error] Fatal: Unable to open file 'OVERBYTEICSD2009RUN.LIB'
>
Hi Xavier,
I got the same error too. but it can be easily fixed by removing the reference
to it in the project options. The Overbyteicsd2009run.lib is f
Hello to all
Finally I migrate from BCB++5 to BDS2009.
I opened CB2009Install.groupproj ( ICS v7, last review from SVN ) and
build and installed both run an design packages. Messages tell that all
was correct.
Then I imported my old project and after some changes program compile
but I get next
Unfortunately, I can't do that. As you may recollect, it took approx 1.5
years
for me to find a free time for fixing the bug. ICS has changed
tremendously
during this period, and I did not follow the changes, alas. One of the
reasons
for this is that the old version works stable and upgrade is
Unfortunately, I can't do that. As you may recollect, it took approx 1.5 years
for me to find a free time for fixing the bug. ICS has changed tremendously
during this period, and I did not follow the changes, alas. One of the reasons
for this is that the old version works stable and upgrade is nee
I am not sure if this is the issue that has been fixed but during our coding
for HTTP server, we found an issue as well:
When persistent connections are in place and when the client sends multiple
GET requests in pipelined mode, it was getting confused (gfx not showing
etc...)
Did anybody else see
If anybody wants to continue work on the GpHTTPProxy I would be happy
to revoke any rights on that unit (except as the original author). I
would also change the license if required .
Maybe Stanislav will take the lead on this component ?
--
francois.pie...@overbyte.be
The author of the freew
> Now it seems that I managed to fix the bug using the proprietary sources
> provided
> by Primoz Gabrijelcic as a reference for me by a non-disclosure agreement.
> As the agreement concerns the proprietary sources only, and the patched source
> is the GpHTTPProxy indeed, I suppose the agreement d
