Re: [twsocket] 2006 Developer Conference in Northern California
Fastream Technologies wrote: You can mention the 32-connections-per-thread async/MT mixed system that is only possible with non-blocking sockets such as ICS. I can send you C++ code snippets. And would appreciate if you mentioned IQRP as an example. I recently started writing a MT TWSocket server component featuring a thread pool as well as a TWsocket pool inside a thread. It allows to set a fixed number of client threads and/or a fixed number of clients per thread. It's possible to grow either in the number of threads or the number of clients per thread, this should meet most requirements. --- Arno Garrels [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 11:33 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] 2006 Developer Conference in Northern California Francois PIETTE wrote: There is currently a call for paper (http://bdn.borland.com/article/33526) for the 2006 Developer Conference. I could submit some abstract about ICS and/or MidWare. Any killing idea ? I don't think it's killing, but most developers believe multi- threaded server applications are better done with blocking sockets, time to clear them up. --- Arno Garrels [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The author for the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare The author of the freeware Internet Component Suite (ICS) http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] 2006 Developer Conference in Northern California
Fastream Technologies wrote: Yes this approach is the best for FTP/SMTP/POP3 servers. We use a dynamic thread pool which remembers the number of threads served in the last second and scales the thread destruction/pooling with respect to that. This is even better than fixed number of threads. Of course, my new MT server therefore has both a dynamic thread pool as well as a dynamic client pool per thread. Threads and clients can be preallocated. Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 10:44 AM Subject: Re: [twsocket] 2006 Developer Conference in Northern California Fastream Technologies wrote: You can mention the 32-connections-per-thread async/MT mixed system that is only possible with non-blocking sockets such as ICS. I can send you C++ code snippets. And would appreciate if you mentioned IQRP as an example. I recently started writing a MT TWSocket server component featuring a thread pool as well as a TWsocket pool inside a thread. It allows to set a fixed number of client threads and/or a fixed number of clients per thread. It's possible to grow either in the number of threads or the number of clients per thread, this should meet most requirements. --- Arno Garrels [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html Regards, SZ - Original Message - From: Arno Garrels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ICS support mailing twsocket@elists.org Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 11:33 PM Subject: Re: [twsocket] 2006 Developer Conference in Northern California Francois PIETTE wrote: There is currently a call for paper (http://bdn.borland.com/article/33526) for the 2006 Developer Conference. I could submit some abstract about ICS and/or MidWare. Any killing idea ? I don't think it's killing, but most developers believe multi- threaded server applications are better done with blocking sockets, time to clear them up. --- Arno Garrels [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The author for the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare The author of the freeware Internet Component Suite (ICS) http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
[twsocket] 2006 Developer Conference in Northern California
There is currently a call for paper (http://bdn.borland.com/article/33526) for the 2006 Developer Conference. I could submit some abstract about ICS and/or MidWare. Any killing idea ? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The author for the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare The author of the freeware Internet Component Suite (ICS) http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
Re: [twsocket] 2006 Developer Conference in Northern California
Francois PIETTE wrote: There is currently a call for paper (http://bdn.borland.com/article/33526) for the 2006 Developer Conference. I could submit some abstract about ICS and/or MidWare. Any killing idea ? I don't think it's killing, but most developers believe multi-threaded server applications are better done with blocking sockets, time to clear them up. --- Arno Garrels [TeamICS] http://www.overbyte.be/eng/overbyte/teamics.html -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] The author for the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare The author of the freeware Internet Component Suite (ICS) http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
