Dod wrote:
> You said "disabled", one thing I learned by experience about FWs and
> AVs is that they are never 100% "disabled", you MUST uninstall them to
> be sure they are not causing the problem because disabling keep low
> level drivers loaded.
That's my experience as well and the only r
t; Behalf Of Arno Garrels
KW> Sent: Monday, 2 February 2009 3:43 AM
KW> To: ICS support mailing
KW> Subject: Re: [twsocket] EAccessViolations when Posting Data to a HTTPServer
KW> Keith Willis wrote:
>> Well I tried "malloc" and "free" without any joy. I have
sts.org [mailto:twsocket-boun...@elists.org] On
> Behalf Of Arno Garrels
> Sent: Monday, 2 February 2009 3:43 AM
> To: ICS support mailing
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] EAccessViolations when Posting Data to a
> HTTPServer
>
> Keith Willis wrote:
>> Well I tried "malloc&q
[twsocket] EAccessViolations when Posting Data to a HTTPServer
Keith Willis wrote:
> Well I tried "malloc" and "free" without any joy. I have however been
> able to ascertain that its crashing in the call to "Receive".
>
> More significantly its only crashing on
Keith Willis wrote:
> Well I tried "malloc" and "free" without any joy. I have however been
> able to ascertain that its crashing in the call to "Receive".
>
> More significantly its only crashing on my target machine, (an ASUS
> EEE Box B202 running Windows XP Home). I can't seem to crash it on m
Well I tried "malloc" and "free" without any joy. I have however been able
to ascertain that its crashing in the call to "Receive".
More significantly its only crashing on my target machine, (an ASUS EEE Box
B202 running Windows XP Home). I can't seem to crash it on my development
PC, (A generic P
y, 1 February 2009 3:55 AM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] EAccessViolations when Posting Data to a HTTPServer
Keith Willis wrote:
> Just confirming that you meant to write:
>
> ClientCnx->Receive(Junk, sizeof(Junk));
>
> Instead of:
>
> ClientCnx->
Keith Willis wrote:
> Just confirming that you meant to write:
>
> ClientCnx->Receive(Junk, sizeof(Junk));
>
> Instead of:
>
> ClientCnx->Receive(&Junk, sizeof(Junk));
I don't think so, I meant the address of Junk which is the
address of the first element of the static array, isn't it?
Same
Arno,
No luck I'm afraid... I'm still getting those AV's :(
Keith.
Here's my current code... As per your suggested code.
I also made the TMemoryManager global to the application.
I will try free and malloc next.
<<< CODE SNIPPETS >>>
//---
Hi Arno,
Just confirming that you meant to write:
ClientCnx->Receive(Junk, sizeof(Junk));
Instead of:
ClientCnx->Receive(&Junk, sizeof(Junk));
Cheers,
Keith.
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tw
Keith Willis wrote:
> Hi Arno,
>
>> You never check PostedDataSize, the size of your receive buffer.
>> The pascal demo allocates this buffer dynamically depending on the
> RequestContentLength plus one byte for the null terminator in the
> OnPostDocument event handler.
>> What is the value of Rcv
Hi Arno,
> You never check PostedDataSize, the size of your receive buffer.
> The pascal demo allocates this buffer dynamically depending on the
RequestContentLength plus one byte for the null terminator in the
OnPostDocument event handler.
> What is the value of RcvdByteCount when the error happe
Keith Willis wrote:
> I have managed to improve the code reliability by not dynamically
> allocating the PostedDataBuffer at all, (but this is not an
> acceptable solution). In the code snippets below I pre-allocate once
> in the constructor but this still generates AV's.
You never check PostedDa
Dear All,
I have recently written a small Web Server application using the THttpServer
component in ICS 5 with C++ Builder 5.
It serves GET requests perfectly, but when I added POST functionality,
(following the WebServ example) it has started generating EAccessViolations.
CodeGuard reports that
14 matches
Mail list logo
