Arno Garrels wrote:
> IMHO it's not very easy to keep backwards compatibility.
Maybe, but the question is what specifically should be done to make ICS support
IPv6. On the component level all IP's are operated as strings - no problem
here. Maybe you'll just need to implement a pair of new functi
Just curious, why? AFAIK Ip6 is not compatible to Ip4, so why not
implement a new branch? Or is the idea that one component should be able
to handle all?
Yes, of course.
I think so--another branch will cause a lot of rework for future updates,
wouldn't it?
Indeed. And some maintenance heada
Just curious, why? AFAIK Ip6 is not compatible to Ip4, so why not
implement
a new branch? Or is the idea that one component should be able to handle
all?
albert
I think so--another branch will cause a lot of rework for future updates,
wouldn't it?
You can't make a version for IPv6 only.
I
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:55 AM, A Drent wrote:
>
>
> IMHO it's not very easy to keep backwards compatibility.
>>>
>>
>> And this is very important.
>>
>> --
>>
>
> Just curious, why? AFAIK Ip6 is not compatible to Ip4, so why not implement
> a new branch? Or is the idea that one component shoul
IMHO it's not very easy to keep backwards compatibility.
And this is very important.
--
Just curious, why? AFAIK Ip6 is not compatible to Ip4, so why not implement
a new branch? Or is the idea that one component should be able to handle
all?
albert
--
To unsubscribe or change your s
I wonder, what changes should be done to support IPv6. For now I see
onlu few functions like gethostaddr etc, and some Socks5 stuff. This
seems not very hard to implement (provided that new APIs appear).
IMHO it's not very easy to keep backwards compatibility.
And this is very important.
--
f
Anton Sviridov wrote:
> I wonder, what changes should be done to support IPv6. For now I see
> onlu few functions like gethostaddr etc, and some Socks5 stuff. This
> seems not very hard to implement (provided that new APIs appear).
IMHO it's not very easy to keep backwards compatibility.
--
Arn
I wonder, what changes should be done to support IPv6. For now I see onlu few
functions like gethostaddr etc, and some Socks5 stuff. This seems not very hard
to implement (provided that new APIs appear).
--
Anton
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto htt
- Original Message -
From: "Francois PIETTE"
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] OT: IPv4 address shortage reaching critical stage
I only have an approximate idea about tthe work to be done.
Anyway, I wou
Situation has not changed sinced last time someone asked: I will do IPv6
when a customer will ask for it for a large enough project.
If enough peoples are interested, we can do a similar thing as we've done
for ICS-SSL: peoples give some financial contribution to fund the
development and I do it.
Hi Francois,
I believe it would be better you to state the amount of payment to collect.
Regards,
SZ
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Francois PIETTE
wrote:
> Any progress on IPv6 ?
>>
>
> Situation has not changed sinced last time someone asked: I will do IPv6
> when a customer will ask for i
Any progress on IPv6 ?
Situation has not changed sinced last time someone asked: I will do IPv6
when a customer will ask for it for a large enough project.
If enough peoples are interested, we can do a similar thing as we've done
for ICS-SSL: peoples give some financial contribution to fund
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-385195.html?tag=nl.e589
Any progress on IPv6 ?
Paul
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
13 matches
Mail list logo
