Hello Dan,
>> Buffer : array [0..5] of char;
Variables on the stack does not consume time. Only if something has to
be initialized or so, like for example a long string.
---
Rgds, Wilfried
http://www.mestdagh.biz
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
pleas
Hello Wilfried,
I am not sure that is consume no time. If I remember well, local vars
are dynamicaly allocated and deallocated each time you go into the
procedure, so it take a bit (not much) to allocate/deallocate it and
finally you may produce more memory fragmentation.
I may be wrong bu
> WM> Variables on the stack does not consume time. Only if something has to
> WM> be initialized or so, like for example a long string.
> I am not sure that is consume no time. If I remember well, local vars
> are dynamicaly allocated and deallocated each time you go into the
> procedure, s
Hello Francois,
So I was wrong and it is nice because I tended to avoid local vars
declarations :-) But I remember having read somewhere that
using/accessing local vars was slower than global ones and this why I
said that.
>> WM> Variables on the stack does not consume time. Only
> So I was wrong and it is nice because I tended to avoid local vars
> declarations :-) But I remember having read somewhere that
> using/accessing local vars was slower than global ones and this why I
> said that.
The quality of a program is somewhat in inverse ratio to the numbe
- Original Message -
From: "Wilfried Mestdagh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2005 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] Transfer with UDP
> Hello Dan,
>
>>> Buffer : array [0..5] of char;
>
> Variables on the stack does not consume time. Only
