Hello, All!
We have a reverse-proxy built from Primoz Gabrijelcic's proxy component.
It works ok all the time except for some sporadic cases when IE and Opera
browsers breakes keep-alive connection. The 10053 error comes as wParam
in the XSocketWindowProc. FireFox does not produce the error.
The
Probably nothing. See the header on the SmtpClient for the changes made in
the versions. An explanation about the removal of ShareMode should be there.
The ICS guys are very 'clean' :)
Cheers,
Marcelo Grossi
- Original Message -
From: "kaythorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday
Does the SmtpCli and SyncSmtpCli support NTLM authentication, and if so,
what setting needs to be enabled to use it?
Sincerely,
Brad Gies
-
NLM Software
Southfield, MI, USA
-
Do everything in moderation including ab
Gies,Brad wrote:
> Does the SmtpCli and SyncSmtpCli support NTLM authentication, and if
> so, what setting needs to be enabled to use it?
It's not yet implemented. The THttpCli already uses NTLM authentication,
so it should not be very difficult to make the TSmtpCli NTLM-capable as
well.
---
Arno
You get the session closed after calling ThreadDetach ?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.overbyte.be
- Original Message -
From: "Arno Garrels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] V6 ThreadDetach #2
> Already got it! I
Francois PIETTE wrote:
> You get the session closed after calling ThreadDetach ?
Yes, since I'm always stress testing. A client may disconnect at
any time. It would be more straight ahead if the getter would become
a real getter (returning zero if there's no window available) then
checking the re
> what do you think?
The getter could be changed but this could break something elsewhere
depending on the handle being created when needed. Since checking the handle
value is useful to know if attached or not to a thread, maybe a simple new
method IsThreadAttached could be created, just return
Francois PIETTE wrote:
>> what do you think?
>
> The getter could be changed but this could break something elsewhere
I don't know where else this might be impotant. Instead I thought that
V6 is an oportunity to get rid of the old ballast
> depending on the handle being created when needed. Si
What should I use for a stable release of a program compiled with C++Builder
2006?
1. The latest ICS-V5 (date unknown-not mentioned on web site).
2. The BETA ICS-V5 (May 14, 2006). Stable enough for C++Builder 2006 use?
3. The BETA ICS-V6 (June 13, 2006). Stable enough for C++Builder 2006 use?
T
v6 rules here!
- Original Message -
From: "Albert Wiersch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'ICS support mailing'"
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 12:01 AM
Subject: [twsocket] Still confused about what distribution to use...
:
: What should I use for a stable release of a program compiled with
10 matches
Mail list logo