On Oct 1, 2008, at 22:03, Ko Brink wrote:
> HTTP/1.1 302 Found
> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:43:51 GMT
> Server: Apache
> Set-Cookie:
> %5fTGl0dGxlTXV0dC5jb20%3d=VmlpM0pNdXFxdFhLWngwUHB5ZTlGT0NPQVM3T0p6UjcK;
> path=/; domain=.ifastnet.com
> Location: /main.php
> Transfer-Encoding: chunked
> Content
What is the method are you trying? If it is POST, POST after 302 is not
possible--POST request after redirection becomes GET.
Regards,
SZ
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 5:03 AM, Ko Brink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is driving me crazy, i have no idea what i have to do, to get the
> whole header o
On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:05:55 +0200, Fastream Technologies
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is driving me crazy, i have no idea what i have to do, to get the
>> whole header or atleased the real cookie
>>
>> this is what i get back from my program in bcb6 and ICSv6
>>
>> HTTP/1.1 302 Found
>> D
No, i get the same cookie in the header and the OnCookie, but checking
more sites today, maybe it has nothing to do with Transfer-Encoding:
chunked.
for another example FireFox gives me
HTTP/1.x 302 Moved Temporarily
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:45:32 GMT
Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0
Set-Cookie:
Never mind, i found the throuble in my code i'm Posting the wrong data to
the server, the cookie is constructed from that data so my mistake
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our websit
> Never mind, i found the throuble in my code i'm Posting the wrong data
> to the server, the cookie is constructed from that data so my mistake
I greatly appreciate you gave this feedback about you own error.
And remember: there is no problem asking in the mailing list.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
T
99% of my Delphi work is in Delphi 6. We use a few ICS V5 components, but
they work so well it is easy to forget they are there. :)
I'm rewriting one of our utilities and decided to use Delphi 2009. This
utility used ICS V5, so I'm migrating it to ICS V7.
The utility uses a modified version of
> A similar unit is not included with V7. The OverbyteIcsTcpSrv demo in V7
> does a lot that TTcpDaemon does, but without using a separate class. So
> I'm
> wondering why something like TTcpDaemon isn't used anymore.
Just that no one took the time to make the slights changes to have that demo
