I mean the TCP stack itself. The bugs in first Trumpet and then MS Winsock
caused many problems throughout the years since Internet flourished. (AFAIK,
since 1993-4). All the coders chose to implement top-level protocols (like
you) and it was left to MS for doing the complex TCP job...
Regards,
S
invented a new TCP
> stack, but rather just different info being passed through TCP.
>
> Regards...
>
> Hoby
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Fastream Technologies
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 10:35
> ICS has codes for
> SMTP/POP/HTTP/FTP (all text) but not for TCP.
I'm not sure about what you mean.
ICS as TWSocket and TWSocketServer for TCP.
Contribute to the SSL Effort. Visit http://www.overbyte.be/eng/ssl.html
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The author of the freeware multi-tier middleware MidWare
CTED] On
Behalf Of Fastream Technologies
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 10:35 AM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!)
MP3 is not a protocol but a file format. You are right that TCP/UDP uses
binary headers but we are talking about a high level
s that can be interpreted into forms that humans can
> understand as needed, or can be handled by clients as necessary.
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Fastream Technologies
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 5:43 AM
From: "Dave Baxter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ICS support mailing"
Sent: Thursday, 07 February, 2008 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!)
>I suspect that's half the point. Only like equipped users can
> communicate.
nal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Fastream Technologies
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 5:43 AM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!)
I wonder why he chose a binary format instead of text as no popul
se, the powers that be, like to
> watch what goes on Silly me...
>
> Cheers.. I'll crawl back under my rock, it's a bit too bright out
> here...
>
> Dave B.
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: DZ-Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent
t: Thursday, February 07, 2008 11:56 AM
> To: ICS support mailing
> Subject: Re: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and more!)
>
> Hello:
> Also, if it is "not compatible with SMTP", how does
> anybody outside your own mail server network get it? And if
Hello:
Also, if it is "not compatible with SMTP", how does anybody outside
your own mail server network get it? And if it does communicate with
external SMTP servers in order to inter-operate with other networks
(otherwise, what's the point in sending yourself e-mail?) then it *is*
sus
That's what I love about standards, everybody has one :)
BTW, where's the RFC for this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David A. G.
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:51 PM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail proto
So you lock out 99.9% of the email - no wonder it blocks spam.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of David A. G.
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 6:51 PM
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: [twsocket] AN: New e-mail protocol (spam free and mor
I wonder why he chose a binary format instead of text as no popular/common
protocol is designed that way (i.e. HTTP, FTP, IMAP--all telnet based)!
Regards,
SZ
On 2/7/08, DZ-Jay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, rather than a new "protocol", you have created a new e-mail server
> and client sys
So, rather than a new "protocol", you have created a new e-mail server
and client system which communicates in its own proprietary binary
format?
dZ.
On Feb 6, 2008, at 18:50, David A. G. wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> I have developed a complete and very improved e-mail protocol, highly
14 matches
Mail list logo
