Just a non-well-informed thought:
Are you not able to cache the results and combine multiple requests that would
return the same results into a single first call and subsequent requests would
read from the cache? That is to say comparing 50 calls to 300 calls, the
likelihood of more of the requests actually asking the same thing and getting
the same results is higher, so calling the DNSLookup only once for all the
unique requests should result in a speed improvement.
Stephen Dickason
Senior Developer - Managed Services
Email: sdicka...@elcb.co.za
ELCB Information Services (Pty) Ltd
Customer Service Email e...@elcb.co.za * www.elcb.co.za
E A S T L O N D O N
Tel: +27(43) 704 0700
Fax: +27(43) 704 0701
J O H A N N E S B U R G
Tel: +27(11) 879 6179
Fax: +27(11) 454 0384
P O R T E L I Z A B E T H
Tel: +27(41) 373 0529
Fax: +27(86) 650 0135
Disclaimer
-Original Message-
From: TWSocket [mailto:twsocket-boun...@lists.elists.org] On Behalf Of Max
Terentiev
Sent: 18 September 2015 02:07
To: ICS support mailing
Subject: [twsocket] TWSocket.Connet/GetHostByName bottleneck
Hi,
I develop smtp relay server using ICS. And I notice very big performance hit if
many TSmtpCli's connects to remote MX server in parallel !
I use TDnsQuery to resolve domain's MX server then supply result to TSmtpCli.
If I use 100+ TSmtpCli instances most of them waits for OnRequestDone after
TSmtpCli.Connect call.
Looks like problem in TWSocket.DnsLookup because they call
WSocket_Synchronized_WSAAsyncGetHostByName but MSDN say:
"The WSAAsyncGetHostByName function is not designed to provide parallel
resolution of several names."
So, if 100 TSmtpCli's perform Connect they can't do it in parallel because
WSAAsyncGetHostByName works sequentially. So 300+ TSmtpCli's works slower than
50 TSmtpCli's because waits for WSAAsyncGetHostByName queue.
Can you suggest some workaround to avoid this problem ?
At this time I see this way:
1. Use TDNSQuery.MXLookup to resolve MX, then TDNSQuery.ALookup to resolve MX's
IP. Then supply resolved MX IP to TSmtpCli to avoid GetHostByName.
2. Cache both MX and A results in my own DNS cache.
But maybe you can suggest more efficient way ? Maybe some tuning or secret
option in ICS ?
Thanks for help !
---
With best regards, Max Terentiev.
Business Software Products.
AMS Development Team.
supp...@bspdev.com
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto
http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be