Re: [TXWWFF] Flow Rates for Fishability

2004-06-05 Thread Graham Jones
Gary,

A good indicator when you view the sites that have data on stream flow rate is a
comparison to the historical flow. That is, if the 'normal' rate is 100 cf/m and
the present rate is 400 cf/m, you know the waterway is apt to be challenging.
When you know a river and it characteristics, the flow rate becomes much more
meaningful since you have a point of comparison to what you've experienced
before.


Graham

- Original Message - 
From: "Gary Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: [TXWWFF] Flow Rates for Fishability


> Makes all the sense in the world, Jack.  So I'm thinking the velocity, not
> the volume of water is what we're looking for as wading anglers.  I guess
> calling ahead to check out the river conditions is the way to go rather
> than relying on a cfs chart.
>
> - Gary
>
> At 10:50 PM 6/3/04, you wrote:
>
> >Gary
> >
> >I hope I'm not insulting your intelligence here, but cfs means cubic feet
> >per second.  That's the (number of) cubic feet of water that passes a
> >given point in the river in One second.  As a fur instance, suppose you
> >have a riverbed with a cross section of 100 square feet, ie 1 foot deep
> >and a hundred across, or 2 and 50, etc.  A flow rate of 100 cfs means that
> >100 cubic feet of water goes past in one second, or the river is flowing
> >at 1 foot per second.  Pretty easy fishing.  At 500 cfs this same section
> >of riverbed would have a speed of 5 feet per second.  Just try and stand
> >up in that!  Going the other way, a 100 cfs flow on a streambed with a
> >cross section of only 20 sq ft would have the 5 foot per second
> >speed.  Back in undergraduate studies, we had to measure just this -
> >guesstimate the cross section of the river by taking depth measurements
> >and width measurements, then measuring the flow by letting something drift
> >in the current for a set period of time and tape measuring it.
> >
> >What I'm trying to say here is that cfs by itself doesn't tell me anything
> >significant.  You need to know the shape of the river at the point you are
> >fishing.  I know that the Guadalupe is pretty easy wading at 200 cfs, and
> >very tricky to dangerous at 500.  Actually, thinking about it, the Guad
> >would be pretty close to your hypothetical 100 sq ft cross section most
> >places I wade.  Some are wide and shallow, others up to hip deep and
> >narrow.  The really big holes (very large cross section) would have a
> >greatly reduced flow speed, but the cfs rate would still be the same.  And
> >as the cfs goes up, the depth, hence the cross section goes up.  When the
> >Guad was running at 135,000 cfs a couple of years ago, the depth was
> >probably up around 50 feet in places, and width a quarter mile.
> >
> >Clear as mud yet, or want me to confuse you some more?
> >
> >Jack
> >Austin
> >Gary Miller wrote:
> >
> >>For those of you who are savvy about such things, what is an acceptable
> >>flow rate for wade fishing in rivers and streams?  I want to know such
> >>things as maximum flow rate for safe wading, drifting, etc.
> >>
> >>Thanks.
> >>
> >>- Gary
> >>
> >>.
> >>.
> >>.
> >>For "unsubcribe" instructions, send an e-mail to
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >.
> >.
> >.
> >For "unsubcribe" instructions, send an e-mail to
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >---
> >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> >Version: 6.0.688 / Virus Database: 449 - Release Date: 5/18/04
>

.
.
.
For "unsubcribe" instructions, send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [TXWWFF] Flow Rates for Fishability

2004-06-04 Thread Gary Miller
Makes all the sense in the world, Jack.  So I'm thinking the velocity, not 
the volume of water is what we're looking for as wading anglers.  I guess 
calling ahead to check out the river conditions is the way to go rather 
than relying on a cfs chart.

- Gary
At 10:50 PM 6/3/04, you wrote:
Gary
I hope I'm not insulting your intelligence here, but cfs means cubic feet 
per second.  That's the (number of) cubic feet of water that passes a 
given point in the river in One second.  As a fur instance, suppose you 
have a riverbed with a cross section of 100 square feet, ie 1 foot deep 
and a hundred across, or 2 and 50, etc.  A flow rate of 100 cfs means that 
100 cubic feet of water goes past in one second, or the river is flowing 
at 1 foot per second.  Pretty easy fishing.  At 500 cfs this same section 
of riverbed would have a speed of 5 feet per second.  Just try and stand 
up in that!  Going the other way, a 100 cfs flow on a streambed with a 
cross section of only 20 sq ft would have the 5 foot per second 
speed.  Back in undergraduate studies, we had to measure just this - 
guesstimate the cross section of the river by taking depth measurements 
and width measurements, then measuring the flow by letting something drift 
in the current for a set period of time and tape measuring it.

What I'm trying to say here is that cfs by itself doesn't tell me anything 
significant.  You need to know the shape of the river at the point you are 
fishing.  I know that the Guadalupe is pretty easy wading at 200 cfs, and 
very tricky to dangerous at 500.  Actually, thinking about it, the Guad 
would be pretty close to your hypothetical 100 sq ft cross section most 
places I wade.  Some are wide and shallow, others up to hip deep and 
narrow.  The really big holes (very large cross section) would have a 
greatly reduced flow speed, but the cfs rate would still be the same.  And 
as the cfs goes up, the depth, hence the cross section goes up.  When the 
Guad was running at 135,000 cfs a couple of years ago, the depth was 
probably up around 50 feet in places, and width a quarter mile.

Clear as mud yet, or want me to confuse you some more?
Jack
Austin
Gary Miller wrote:
For those of you who are savvy about such things, what is an acceptable 
flow rate for wade fishing in rivers and streams?  I want to know such 
things as maximum flow rate for safe wading, drifting, etc.

Thanks.
- Gary
.
.
.
For "unsubcribe" instructions, send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
.
.
For "unsubcribe" instructions, send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.688 / Virus Database: 449 - Release Date: 5/18/04


Re: [TXWWFF] Flow Rates for Fishability

2004-06-03 Thread Jack Lehman
Gary
I hope I'm not insulting your intelligence here, but cfs means cubic 
feet per second.  That's the (number of) cubic feet of water that passes 
a given point in the river in One second.  As a fur instance, suppose 
you have a riverbed with a cross section of 100 square feet, ie 1 foot 
deep and a hundred across, or 2 and 50, etc.  A flow rate of 100 cfs 
means that 100 cubic feet of water goes past in one second, or the river 
is flowing at 1 foot per second.  Pretty easy fishing.  At 500 cfs this 
same section of riverbed would have a speed of 5 feet per second.  Just 
try and stand up in that!  Going the other way, a 100 cfs flow on a 
streambed with a cross section of only 20 sq ft would have the 5 foot 
per second speed.  Back in undergraduate studies, we had to measure just 
this - guesstimate the cross section of the river by taking depth 
measurements and width measurements, then measuring the flow by letting 
something drift in the current for a set period of time and tape 
measuring it.

What I'm trying to say here is that cfs by itself doesn't tell me 
anything significant.  You need to know the shape of the river at the 
point you are fishing.  I know that the Guadalupe is pretty easy wading 
at 200 cfs, and very tricky to dangerous at 500.  Actually, thinking 
about it, the Guad would be pretty close to your hypothetical 100 sq ft 
cross section most places I wade.  Some are wide and shallow, others up 
to hip deep and narrow.  The really big holes (very large cross section) 
would have a greatly reduced flow speed, but the cfs rate would still be 
the same.  And as the cfs goes up, the depth, hence the cross section 
goes up.  When the Guad was running at 135,000 cfs a couple of years 
ago, the depth was probably up around 50 feet in places, and width a 
quarter mile.

Clear as mud yet, or want me to confuse you some more?
Jack
Austin
Gary Miller wrote:
For those of you who are savvy about such things, what is an 
acceptable flow rate for wade fishing in rivers and streams?  I want 
to know such things as maximum flow rate for safe wading, drifting, etc.

Thanks.
- Gary
.
.
.
For "unsubcribe" instructions, send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
.
.
For "unsubcribe" instructions, send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: [TXWWFF] Flow Rates for Fishability

2004-06-03 Thread L. C. Clower
Gary, the best bet is to check the canoe and kayak websites, they link to a
variety of other websites that rate the stream flow in terms of paddling.
If it ain't got enough water to float, access will be laborious and the
fishing will most probably be poor.


L. C. Clower
6925 Conestoga Dr.
Rowlett TX  75089
972-463-5126
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo!Messenger: lcclower2431
AOL IM:  Lcclower

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Miller
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 6:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TXWWFF] Flow Rates for Fishability


My reason for asking is for those times when you are thinking about
travelling to a river that you are unfamiliar with.  Checking the flow
chart might give an indication of whether you should bother to make the
trip or not.



At 05:16 PM 6/3/04, you wrote:

>I know if it's safe as soon as I see it.  If not then, when I get in it.  I
>know that's not the answer you're looking for but I think there are way to
>many variables to be able to say what's safe or not depending on the river.
>
>Roger
>- Original Message -
>From: "Gary Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: 
>Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 11:17 AM
>Subject: [TXWWFF] Flow Rates for Fishability
>
>
> > For those of you who are savvy about such things, what is an acceptable
> > flow rate for wade fishing in rivers and streams?  I want to know such
> > things as maximum flow rate for safe wading, drifting, etc.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > - Gary
> >
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > For "unsubcribe" instructions, send an e-mail to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>.
>.
>.
>For "unsubcribe" instructions, send an e-mail to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.688 / Virus Database: 449 - Release Date: 5/18/04

.
.
.
For "unsubcribe" instructions, send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [TXWWFF] Flow Rates for Fishability

2004-06-03 Thread Gary Miller
My reason for asking is for those times when you are thinking about 
travelling to a river that you are unfamiliar with.  Checking the flow 
chart might give an indication of whether you should bother to make the 
trip or not.


At 05:16 PM 6/3/04, you wrote:
I know if it's safe as soon as I see it.  If not then, when I get in it.  I
know that's not the answer you're looking for but I think there are way to
many variables to be able to say what's safe or not depending on the river.
Roger
- Original Message -
From: "Gary Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 11:17 AM
Subject: [TXWWFF] Flow Rates for Fishability
> For those of you who are savvy about such things, what is an acceptable
> flow rate for wade fishing in rivers and streams?  I want to know such
> things as maximum flow rate for safe wading, drifting, etc.
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Gary
>
> .
> .
> .
> For "unsubcribe" instructions, send an e-mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
.
.
.
For "unsubcribe" instructions, send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.688 / Virus Database: 449 - Release Date: 5/18/04


Re: [TXWWFF] Flow Rates for Fishability

2004-06-03 Thread Roger Simonsen
I know if it's safe as soon as I see it.  If not then, when I get in it.  I
know that's not the answer you're looking for but I think there are way to
many variables to be able to say what's safe or not depending on the river.

Roger
- Original Message - 
From: "Gary Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 11:17 AM
Subject: [TXWWFF] Flow Rates for Fishability


> For those of you who are savvy about such things, what is an acceptable
> flow rate for wade fishing in rivers and streams?  I want to know such
> things as maximum flow rate for safe wading, drifting, etc.
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Gary
>
> .
> .
> .
> For "unsubcribe" instructions, send an e-mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

.
.
.
For "unsubcribe" instructions, send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [TXWWFF] Flow Rates for Fishability

2004-06-03 Thread Scott McBain
Howdy,
 
My brother is in civil engineering and he said it depends on depth and width of the river to calculate a velocity.  However velocity is only half the issue, your ability to safely stand a particular current is directly effected by it's depth.  I.E.  if it's only a few inches deep you can safely stand a fairly high flow rate, but if it's up to your chest it doesn't take much to push you off your feet.  I tried to get a formula that reflected this, but he wouldn't be pinned down.
 
Gary Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For those of you who are savvy about such things, what is an acceptable flow rate for wade fishing in rivers and streams? I want to know such things as maximum flow rate for safe wading, drifting, etc.Thanks.- Gary...For "unsubcribe" instructions, send an e-mail to[EMAIL PROTECTED]YBIC,Scott><)))>
		Do you Yahoo!?Friends.  Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger