Hi,
a user is reporting, that setting "silent" and "baudrate" environment
variables on ARM have no effect on the console bahaviour. I didn't test
this but looking at the code it looks logical - the console is initialised
before environment variables are read. Question - is this a bug that has
Hi All,
I'm using a u-boot.1.2.0 code base, do we have a "scanf()" type of function
call where i can use.
Please help me in this regard.
Thanks,
Ajeesh Kumar
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the ad
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 17:40:34 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <200901141137.37144.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> > too bad watchdog documentation is non-existent to useless. ive asked on
> > the list in the past for more info on how it works with no response.
> > CONFIG_HW_WATCHDOG is d
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 06:34:34PM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> David has said before that ftdump is sort of a pointless debugging tool.
>> Or at least that is what the Debian bug report referrenced as the reason
>> from removing it from the Debian dtc package.
>
> As long as
Josh Boyer wrote:
> David has said before that ftdump is sort of a pointless debugging tool.
> Or at least that is what the Debian bug report referrenced as the reason
> from removing it from the Debian dtc package.
As long as you have the original device tree source code to hand. I tend
to find
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 02:19:05PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 02:11:22PM -0500, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > Matt Sealey wrote:
> >> Josh Boyer wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:57:42AM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
> I just noticed (was told by an affi
Dear Adam Graham,
In message <1231887261-30490-1-git-send-email-agra...@amcc.com> you wrote:
>
> --- a/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_ibm_ddr2_autocalib.c
> +++ b/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_ibm_ddr2_autocalib.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,12 @@
> #define NUMLOOPS 1 /* configure as you deem approporiate */
> #define NU
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <200901141137.37144.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> too bad watchdog documentation is non-existent to useless. ive asked on the
> list in the past for more info on how it works with no response.
> CONFIG_HW_WATCHDOG is documented nowhere and doesnt jive with
Dear "Vovk Konstantin",
In message <003801c97663$9c341a70$0201a...@main> you wrote:
>
> You can download patch that will add W90P710 ARM SoC from Nuvoton to =
> U-Boot-1.3.3 source tree.
U-Boot 1.3.3 is just too old.
Please rebase your patch against current code (top of tree in git
repository),
Hello again, I would like to add more infos on my problem:
When I try to register the device nand0, the call stack arrives to the
function in the file nand-imx.c in uboot v2.
static int __init imxnd_probe(struct device_d *dev)
{
struct nand_chip *this;
struct
Parallel builds would occasionally issue this build warning:
ln: creating symbolic link `cpu/mpc824x/bedbug_603e.c': File exists
Use "ln -sf" as quick work around for the issue.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
---
cpu/mpc824x/Makefile |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-
On 22:30 Wed 14 Jan , Paal Bakken wrote:
> I have testet a lot more and have found the following:
>
> 1. I tried an old USB 1.0 stick, but got the same bad result...
>
> 2. Then I took that USB 1.0 stick and deleted multiple partitions with linux
> fdisk and created a single bootable FAT32 p
I have testet a lot more and have found the following:
1. I tried an old USB 1.0 stick, but got the same bad result...
2. Then I took that USB 1.0 stick and deleted multiple partitions with linux
fdisk and created a single bootable FAT32 partition. This variant worked
without any problems in u-
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 15:45 -0500, Jonathan Barrow wrote:
> In many of the sources, such as "board.c", I notice calls to
> 'debug()'. The syntax looks similar to printf(), e.g.: debug
> ("Stack Pointer at: %08lx\n", addr_sp);
>
> Is this output sent to the BDM, such as bdi2000? or Ethernet?
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Jonathan Barrow wrote:
> In many of the sources, such as "board.c", I notice calls to
> 'debug()'. The syntax looks similar to printf(), e.g.: debug
> ("Stack Pointer at: %08lx\n", addr_sp);
>
> Is this output sent to the BDM, such as bdi2000? or Ethernet? p
In many of the sources, such as "board.c", I notice calls to
'debug()'. The syntax looks similar to printf(), e.g.: debug
("Stack Pointer at: %08lx\n", addr_sp);
Is this output sent to the BDM, such as bdi2000? or Ethernet? posted
to memory?
Also, is debug() related to the setting in 'conf
I'm looking for a way to get u-boot to ignore the environment variables in
flash
if there is an autoscript on the SD card. The easiest way I can find is to
simply
ignore the environment variables completely and boot u-boot itself off of the
SD
card.
I see there are some other CONFIG's that d
On 18:17 Wed 14 Jan , Vovk Konstantin wrote:
> You can download patch that will add W90P710 ARM SoC from Nuvoton to
> U-Boot-1.3.3 source tree.
please rebase your patch against current dev tree, and also please we will
have a release soon (17 Jan)
and post the patch as describe here http://ww
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 02:11:22PM -0500, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Matt Sealey wrote:
>> Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:57:42AM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
I just noticed (was told by an affiliate) that the DTC compiler
tools shares a tool name "ftdump" with
Hi Matt,
Matt Sealey wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:57:42AM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
>>> I just noticed (was told by an affiliate) that the DTC compiler tools
>>> shares a tool name "ftdump" with the Freetype project. I was doing a
>>> lazy packaging effort to get a
On Wednesday 14 January 2009, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 January 2009, vb wrote:
> > thank you for confirming my suspicions and for your suggestion, I will
> > compare notes with the Linux version (should have thought about this
> > earlier). But I also was under impression that Linux do
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:57:42AM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
>> I just noticed (was told by an affiliate) that the DTC compiler tools
>> shares a tool name "ftdump" with the Freetype project. I was doing a
>> lazy packaging effort to get a few tools around so we can all be r
Hello,
2009/1/14 Paal Bakken :
> I have problems with usb mass storage in u-boot.
> We have our own at91sam9263 board, but I experience exactly the same problems
> on the standard at91sam9263ek. And the usb-port AND memory stick works fine
> in linux. I have tried both FAT and FAT32. Below follo
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:57:42AM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote:
> I just noticed (was told by an affiliate) that the DTC compiler tools
> shares a tool name "ftdump" with the Freetype project. I was doing a
> lazy packaging effort to get a few tools around so we can all be running
> the same ver
I just noticed (was told by an affiliate) that the DTC compiler tools
shares a tool name "ftdump" with the Freetype project. I was doing a
lazy packaging effort to get a few tools around so we can all be running
the same version and build some custom kernel RPMs, and this came up.
Wouldn't a be
On Wednesday 14 January 2009, vb wrote:
> thank you for confirming my suspicions and for your suggestion, I will
> compare notes with the Linux version (should have thought about this
> earlier). But I also was under impression that Linux does not touch
> some parts of PCI configuration, as the mem
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:03 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 January 2009, vb wrote:
>
>> The CONFIG_SYS_PCIE0_XCFGBASE constant (and its counterparts for other
>> PCIe ports) is defined and used in the code, and gets a TLB entry
>> assigned, but I can't find a place where it is programmed
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 11:01:43 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <200901140639.44315.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
> > > It means I can't enable flags CONFIG_HW_WATCHDOG & CONFIG_WATCHDOG
> > > together.
> >
> > CONFIG_WATCHDOG -> software watchdog
> > CONFIG_HW_WATCHDOG -> hardware watchdog
You can download patch that will add W90P710 ARM SoC from Nuvoton to
U-Boot-1.3.3 source tree.
This patch add W90P1 board.
What included:
1.W90P710 ARM7
2.UART0 as standard input/output.
3.W90P710 MAC with KSZ8001 PHY initialization.
4.NOR Flash (tested with M29W320ET)
5.NAND Flash (memory mapped
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <200901140639.44315.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> > It means I can't enable flags CONFIG_HW_WATCHDOG & CONFIG_WATCHDOG
> > together.
>
> CONFIG_WATCHDOG -> software watchdog
> CONFIG_HW_WATCHDOG -> hardware watchdog
Wrong. There is no such thing as a "software
Dear Sachin,
In message <73fa539107892c4c8c7a5aca10c161c85be...@mx2.alphioncorp.local> you
wrote:
>
> In the file 'include/watchdog.h', it has been mentioned that:
> 8<--
> #if defined(CONFIG_HW_WATCHDOG) && defined(CONFIG_WATCHDOG)
> #erro
Hi
I've created a patch to port u-boot for the Embest SBC2440-II Board and I
wondered if anyone could advise me how to submit it for inclusion in the
next release, the one after the forthcoming v2009.01. I'm assuming there
isn't already a port for this board as it's not in the mainline u-boot
On 12/19/08, Jayakrishnan M wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am using u-boot 1.3.3 on a TQM885D board.
> Is u-boot able to write to JFFS2 file system?
U-boot isn't able to write jffs2 filesystem as I know.
Are there any plan for u-boot to add the support of jffs2 fs write?
> I was able to read a file fr
On Tuesday 13 January 2009, vb wrote:
> I am trying to troubleshoot a weird PCIe problem on a PPC460GT based
> target, and it is getting curiouser and curiouser.
>
> There is a tlb overlap I mentioned in an earlier email; on top of that
> there are some things happening in cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_pcie.c whi
On Jan 14, 2009, at 5:34 AM, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 3, 2008, at 11:04 PM, Becky Bruce wrote:
>>
>>> include/flash.h was commented to say that the address in
>>> flash_info->start was a physical address. However, from u-boot's
>>> point of view, and looking at
Giuseppe,
> I think to use:
> dd if=/dev/mtd4 of=/rootfs_jffs2.img
Yes, I think that should do it, but you'll end up with an image the size of
your partition.
If it's a small partition (say 16M) then I guess it's not an issue.
If you have access to an NFS rootfs, then you can boot using that an
Added flash_fixup_stm to fix geometry reversal on STMicro M29W320ET flash chip.
Modeled after flash_fixup_amd, this patch handles the geometry reversal
or erase sectors that exist for ST Micro (now Numonyx) M29W320ET flash.
Since I cannot test all STM's chips, the detection is implemented as
na
The code in fdt_resize() to extend the fdt size to end on a page boundary
is wrong for fdt's not located at an address aligned on a page boundary.
What's even worse, the code would make actualsize shrink rather than grow
if (blob & 0xfff) was bigger than the amount of padding added by ALIGN(),
caus
On Wednesday 14 January 2009, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2008, at 11:04 PM, Becky Bruce wrote:
> > include/flash.h was commented to say that the address in
> > flash_info->start was a physical address. However, from u-boot's
> > point of view, and looking at most flash code, it makes more
> > s
On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 January 2009 12:31:46 Richard Retanubun wrote:
> > Added flash_fixup_stm to fix geometry reversal on
> > STMicro M29W320ET flash chip.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Retanubun
> > ---
> >
> > Added flash_fixup_stm to fix geometry re
On Sunday 11 January 2009, vb wrote:
> The Canyonland board's init.s file (board/amcc/canyonlands/init.S)
> defines the contents of the TLB table for that target, it has these
> two records in the table among others:
>
>
>
> tlbentry(CFG_PCI_BASE, SZ_256
Kumar Gala wrote:
> As I look at this we really need to understand what Haavard was trying
> to get with:
>
> commit 12d30aa79779c2aa7a998bbae4c075f822a53004
> Author: Haavard Skinnemoen
> Date: Thu Dec 13 12:56:34 2007 +0100
>
> cfi_flash: Use map_physmem() and unmap_physmem()
>
>
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 01:40:29 Sachin Rane wrote:
> In the file 'include/watchdog.h', it has been mentioned that:
> 8<--
> #if defined(CONFIG_HW_WATCHDOG) && defined(CONFIG_WATCHDOG)
> #error "Configuration error: CONFIG_HW_WATCHDOG and
Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Dec 3, 2008, at 11:04 PM, Becky Bruce wrote:
>
> > include/flash.h was commented to say that the address in
> > flash_info->start was a physical address. However, from u-boot's
> > point of view, and looking at most flash code, it makes more
> > sense for this to be a vi
Dear all,
I have a board running U-Boot and Linux. The root filesystem for
Linux is in a NOR Flash memory and it is seen as /dev/mtd4 device by
MTD driver.
I want to create an image file of the root filesystem so I'll be able
to copy it into another board.
I think to use:
dd if=/dev/mtd4 of
I have problems with usb mass storage in u-boot.
We have our own at91sam9263 board, but I experience exactly the same problems
on the standard at91sam9263ek. And the usb-port AND memory stick works fine in
linux. I have tried both FAT and FAT32. Below follows an edited screendump of
some usb co
The following changes since commit 5f01ea63a6c263767f548b4f61880b08f7850ffc:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git master
Matthias Fuchs (4):
ppc4xx: Enable auto
On Friday 02 January 2009, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs
Added to u-boot/master.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Stefan
=
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, O
On Friday 02 January 2009, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> This patch adds esd's loadpci BSP command to CPCI4052 and
> CPCI405AB board. This requires CONFIG_CMD_BSP and CONFIG_PRAM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs
Added to u-boot/master.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Stefan
=
On Friday 02 January 2009, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> This patch cleans up CPCI405 board support:
> - wrap long lines
> - unification of spaces in function calls
> - remove dead code
>
> Use correct io accessors on peripherals.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs
Added to u-boot/master.
Thanks.
Best
On Friday 02 January 2009, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> 2nd version of this patch eliminates a whitespace issue :-(
Please put such statements below the "---" next time. They don't really should
be included in the commit text. And it's always helpful to have a patch
revision description (changes in v
Hello,
a month has passed since v6 OMAP3 patches were submitted to this ML
[1]. So far they have not been reviewed nor accepted. Are there any
estimates when that is going to happen? I.e. "when we have time",
"never" or "we don't like OMAP3" would be good answers.
Thanks,
Grazvydas
[1] http://li
Hello All,
We (Thomas Smits and I) have been working on CDC Ethernet support in U-boot.
We ported the Linux Gadget and CDC Ethernet driver to U-boot and added
support for the Atmel AT91SAM9261-EK kit. Support for other cores can
be added easily.
Although it is still work in progress, it is alread
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Remy Bohmer wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> Did anybdy is having idea abt usb console in u-boot i.e development of usb
>> serial emulation(CDC_ACM).I am using smdk2440 development board.
>
> There is a driver 'drivers/serial/usbtty.c' in the u-boot tree, in
> case you mean s
On Jan 14, 2009, at 2:38 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Stefan,
>
> Have you reviewed this. I'm not sure if remvoing the map_physmem() is
> the right answer because I'm assuming Haavard added them for a reason
> (AVR32?). Should we instead change info->start to be a phys_addr_t?
>
> - k
As I look at t
On Dec 3, 2008, at 11:04 PM, Becky Bruce wrote:
> include/flash.h was commented to say that the address in
> flash_info->start was a physical address. However, from u-boot's
> point of view, and looking at most flash code, it makes more
> sense for this to be a virtual address. So I corrected t
Hello,
> Did anybdy is having idea abt usb console in u-boot i.e development of usb
> serial emulation(CDC_ACM).I am using smdk2440 development board.
There is a driver 'drivers/serial/usbtty.c' in the u-boot tree, in
case you mean something like that.
And in case someone wants to port the linux
57 matches
Mail list logo
