actual u-boot top of tree builds with warnings/errors for
the following boards:
ads5121 cpci5200 mecp5200 v38b IAD210 MBX MBX860T NX823
RPXClassic debris PN62
following patch solves this.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de
---
changes since v1:
- eth_putenv_enetaddr() substituted by
On 00:14 Thu 26 Mar , kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote:
Adds support for the Embest SBC2440-II Board (see
http://www.embedinfo.com/english/product/sbc2440-II.asp) with u-boot
programmed in NOR flash.
Implementation is based on the existing u-boot support for s3C2410-based
The masks for various bit defines of LSDMR are common and thus we can
define them in one place rather than replicating them in each config.h
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
include/asm-ppc/fsl_lbc.h | 27 +++
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
board/freescale/mpc8541cds/mpc8541cds.c | 14
board/freescale/mpc8548cds/mpc8548cds.c | 10 +++---
board/freescale/mpc8555cds/mpc8555cds.c | 14
board/freescale/mpc8560ads/mpc8560ads.c |1 +
From: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de
Enabling the instruction cache significantly accelerates U-Boot
operations like CRC checking, image uncompression, etc.
Kudos to Andrea Scian for pointing out.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de
---
include/configs/ads5121.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD schreef:
No, thumb code is less efficient in terms of performance, but this
single file needs thumb code. See LPC2292.
what is the Difference?
until a real big gap please do not use thumb
IAP entries need thumb code. This is not a problem, they are only
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD schreef:
please clean up first before a full review
Hi,
This patch is outdated. After the part 1 patch is OK, I'll work on this
part. I'll include your comments then.
Kind regards,
Remco Poelstra
___
U-Boot
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD schreef:
I'm not an expert in assembly, but at first I had immap.h included in
start.S and it complained about invalid instructions, so if I combine
hardware.h and immap.h, then there must be some way of making sure that
the assembler ignores the C code in
Hi Wolfgang,
Dear Detlev Zundel,
In message 1237998478-18452-4-git-send-email-...@denx.de you wrote:
This pretty unintelligent interface is used on some RTC chips.
Signed-off-by: Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de
...
diff --git a/include/tws.h b/include/tws.h
new file mode 100644
index
On Wednesday 25 March 2009, thomas.lan...@infineon.com wrote:
I'm in the process of preparing some code for a new board and want to use
the generic cfi flash driver. The problem is EBU (External Bus Unit) of the
chip, which is internally 32bit.
Which SoC is this btw?
The access to 8/16bit
Remco Poelstra schreef:
Yes I do. They are straight from the LPC2292 code, so once they were
considered OK. I checked out the the write{s,l,b} functions in asm/io.h,
but although they look similar, for some reason they simply don't work.
Given the similarities between the write{s,l,b} and
Confirmation Reference Number: 78-45-2-12-47-66-4
reply to E-mail to:frank.daniels...@gmail.com
You have won #128;1.000.000.00. Euro (One million Euro) in the Euro Millions
Email
Sweepstakes Program Corporation, held on the 16th of March 2009. In London,
United Kingdom. Please contact the
Hi Scott,
I believe that typecasting a UL to an int, is OK.
Do let me know.
The compiler will implicitly cast unsigned long to int. The explicit cast
is unnecessary clutter which makes it harder to find casts that aren't OK.
Accepted and changed.
Thank You
Amul.
SlinceArm wrote:
Hi , Wolfgang Denk
Thank for your reply : )
U-Boot 1.1.4 is prehistoric, please use reacent code. And minicom is
officially unsupported (see the repective entry in the U-Boot manual).
Ok , i will try to install u-boot-2009-03 in my board
But , is any other setting
My networking hardware needs microcode loaded into it before it will
function. What's the best method to load this code? It's 70KB.
My current u-boot image is 170KB. I started working with the code in
examples and api_examples. But the hello world programs built using
those APIs are 65-72KB in
Jon Smirl wrote:
My networking hardware needs microcode loaded into it before it will
function. What's the best method to load this code? It's 70KB.
My current u-boot image is 170KB. I started working with the code in
examples and api_examples. But the hello world programs built using
those
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Jerry Van Baren gerald.vanba...@ge.com wrote:
Jon Smirl wrote:
My networking hardware needs microcode loaded into it before it will
function. What's the best method to load this code? It's 70KB.
My current u-boot image is 170KB. I started working with the
In message 200903261103.28452...@denx.de you wrote:
#define FLASH_FIXUP_ADDR_8(addr) ((void*)((ulong)(addr)^2))
#define FLASH_FIXUP_ADDR_16(addr) ((void*)((ulong)(addr)^2))
...
Yes, I think this could be accepted. The overall impact on
the driver is not
too big. Let's see if
Can some one tell how to build u-boot and ubl for DM355 to be located on its
NandFlash?
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On 2009-03-26, at 15:21, Jon Smirl wrote:
Libraries appear to be the problem. A program that just returns is 100
bytes, add a puts(hello world) and it is 65KB.
I had expected the u-boot app examples to be smart and use the copy of
those libraries in the u-boot image. For example the demo
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Rafal Jaworowski r...@semihalf.com wrote:
On 2009-03-26, at 15:21, Jon Smirl wrote:
Libraries appear to be the problem. A program that just returns is 100
bytes, add a puts(hello world) and it is 65KB.
I had expected the u-boot app examples to be smart and
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Rafal Jaworowski r...@semihalf.com wrote:
On 2009-03-26, at 15:21, Jon Smirl wrote:
Libraries appear to be the problem. A program that just returns is 100
bytes, add a puts(hello world)
The function is called eth_setenv_enetaddr, not eth_putenv_enetaddr.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
CC: Ben Warren biggerbadder...@gmail.com
---
board/sandburst/karef/karef.c |8
board/sandburst/metrobox/metrobox.c |8
board/xpedite1k/xpedite1k.c
On Thursday 26 March 2009 09:47:08 Jon Smirl wrote:
My networking hardware needs microcode loaded into it before it will
function. What's the best method to load this code? It's 70KB.
can the microcode access external memory (i.e. where u-boot lives) ? iirc,
the external functions are not
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 19:57 +0200, Michael Zaidman wrote:
drivers/net/tsec.c - mii_parse_sr does not wait for auto-negotiation
completion bug fix
In the case when the MIIM_STATUS_LINK is 0 i.e. link is down
This patch fixes a bug in the Sequoia TLB init code to reconfigure
the correct TLB (boot space) after running from RAM. This bug was
introduced with patch 4d332dbeb08f5863d1ea69d91a00c5499d3a87ed
[ppc4xx: Make Sequoia boot vxWorks] which changed the order of the
TLB in the Sequoia init.S file.
Hi Wolfgang,
In message 1237998478-18452-4-git-send-email-...@denx.de you wrote:
This pretty unintelligent interface is used on some RTC chips.
Signed-off-by: Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de
...
diff --git a/include/tws.h b/include/tws.h
new file mode 100644
index 000..bfa8d58
---
Hi Michael,
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the reference. I found this thread very interesting.
Before I submitted the patch I also wondered if it is possible for
the link status to be OK while auto-negotiation has not been completed
yet.
So I dived into the IEEE-802.3 spec (Clause
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Rafal Jaworowski r...@semihalf.com wrote:
On 2009-03-26, at 15:21, Jon Smirl wrote:
Libraries appear to be the
Hi,
I am wondering what the ramifications of not using the MMU in U-Boot are?
I have an MPC8360 (e300 core) where it is capable of disabling the MMU via
the MSR[IR] and MSR[DR] bits.
Before disabling the MMU, I'm just wondering why U-Boot bothers to set up
the MMU on CPU's that providing
cmfai...@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering what the ramifications of not using the MMU in U-Boot are?
I have an MPC8360 (e300 core) where it is capable of disabling the MMU via
the MSR[IR] and MSR[DR] bits.
Before disabling the MMU, I'm just wondering why U-Boot bothers to set
The following changes since commit 33e88c557b29c84c52039ba05993fa70fe62afe3:
Jon Smirl (1):
mpc5200: suppress printf until console initialized
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git master
Stefan Roese (1):
ppc4xx: Sequoia: Fix TLB
Hi
I am working on a port of 1.3.4 to the LPC313x and I am having some trouble
with the ext2fs. U-Boot reads blocks 0x00, 0x02, 0x08, 0x200. I modified the
code to dump the block data as it is read verified that the data is
correct.
The ext2ls command returns nothing, I guess thats because
Richard,
I used 6 for most platforms. 1 is lowest priority - 7 - is the highest.
Regards,
TsiChung
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Richard Retanubun
richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com wrote:
Richard Retanubun wrote:
Hi TC,
TC Liew wrote:
Richard,
Is there a purpose that you used DTIMER 3
From abd87852f80b84e77ab264acdb36e7814302b097 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Retanubun richardretanu...@ruggedcom.com
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:26:01 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Coldfire M5271: Activate u-boot system timer interrupt.
This patch assigns the u-boot system timer interrupt to
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910903260647w549a97acv7101ea9347a76...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
My networking hardware needs microcode loaded into it before it will
function. What's the best method to load this code? It's 70KB.
My current u-boot image is 170KB. I started working with the
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910903260647w549a97acv7101ea9347a76...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
My networking hardware needs microcode loaded into it before it will
function. What's the best method to load this code? It's
For the silicon which doesn't have ROM support in QE, it always needs to load
a pre-built ucode binary to IRAM so that QE can work.
Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Hillel Avni hillel.a...@freescale.com
---
drivers/qe/qe.c |9 +
drivers/qe/qe.h |
There is a workaround for MPC8569 CPU Errata, which needs to set Bit 13 of LBCR
in 4K bootpage. We setup a temp TLB for eLBC controller in bootpage, then
invalidate it after LBCR bit 13 is set.
Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com
---
cpu/mpc85xx/Makefile |1 +
This patch adds MPC8569MDS board support. The UART, QE UEC1 and UEC2, BRD
EEPROM on I2C2 bus, PCI express and DDR3 SPD are supported in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Hillel Avni hillel.a...@freescale.com
---
MAKEALL
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910903261350v21bf16c5l5729927048e0d...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
I'm not sure how you calculate sizes, or how you link your
applications. Note that classical standalone application do not link
against any libraries, so they are really small:
The *.bin
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message 20090325213454.gb18...@game.jcrosoft.org you wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
Please pull The following changes since commit
ee1702d75a30d076139d1841383a1fa7220a0e11:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'next' of ../next
are available in the
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message 200903261839.54706...@denx.de you wrote:
The following changes since commit 33e88c557b29c84c52039ba05993fa70fe62afe3:
Jon Smirl (1):
mpc5200: suppress printf until console initialized
are available in the git repository at:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910903261350v21bf16c5l5729927048e0d...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
I'm not sure how you calculate sizes, or how you link your
applications. Note that classical standalone application do not
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:34:39 -0500
Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
include/configs/MPC8323ERDB.h | 26 -
include/configs/MPC832XEMDS.h | 26 -
include/configs/MPC8349EMDS.h | 62
Hi Peter,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the reference. I found this thread very interesting.
Before I submitted the patch I also wondered if it is possible for
the link status to be OK while auto-negotiation
Minkyu Kang wrote:
There are 3 MMC/SD/SDIO host controllers inside the device.
This patch will support mmc2 and mmc3.
By this patch, the MMC controller actually used is configured by
CONFIG_MMC_INDEX at compile time? I.e. setting CONFIG_MMC_INDEX to 1
will use mmc1, 2 will switch to mmc2 and
Minkyu Kang wrote:
Hi,
I have question or request about omap3 mmc.
I want to write the image to mmc.
But, omap3_mmc has no function for it.
You want to say that OMAP3 MMC driver lacks MMC write support? Yes,
looks so ;)
Do you have some patches for omap3_mmc?
or..
How about
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910903261435x598055f8m74c5ac03ad16b...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
The *.bin format is not smart enough to encode gaps. It just puts in
60KB of zeros.
Yes, of course. A binary image cannot have holes in it.
My ELF files are 73KB.
-rwxr-xr-x 1 jonsmirl
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910903261435x598055f8m74c5ac03ad16b...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
The *.bin format is not smart enough to encode gaps. It just puts in
60KB of zeros.
Yes, of course. A binary image cannot
50 matches
Mail list logo
