Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/5] ehci-hcd: Boost transfer speed

2012-08-04 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Benoît Thébaudeau, Dear Marek Vasut, On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 03:06:00 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: Marek, what do you think? Had a good evening with the EHCI r10 spec, hope I answered most of your questions. Yes, thanks. Sorry again for the delay. I still have a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/7] dfu: DFU backend implementation

2012-08-04 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Mike Frysinger, On Thursday 02 August 2012 09:55:24 Lukasz Majewski wrote: Dear Mike Frysinger, On Tuesday 31 July 2012 02:36:59 Lukasz Majewski wrote: +{ + int i = 0; + + for (; *s; s++) + if (*s == ';') + i++;

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] integrator: break out common config

2012-08-04 Thread Linus Walleij
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote: On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 11:14:34 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote: Hi Linus, On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:35:05 +0200, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:37

Re: [U-Boot] The way the list manages patch submission

2012-08-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Karl, In message 1344041771.12337.2@mofo you wrote: The trouble is getting a patch message back from the list when you send a patch in. For example I sent Why would you want to get your own messages back? You already know what you sent, don't you?

Re: [U-Boot] The way the list manages patch submission

2012-08-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Karl, I wrote: It is the configuration you selected. If you don't like it, then go to the list page, click on edit options, and change your settings. Most people prefer it tis way, though. While you are at it, check if you want to enable the Receive your own posts to the list? as

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] integrator: break out common config

2012-08-04 Thread Linus Walleij
The configuration that is common for all Integrator boards may just as well be stored in a common include file as per pattern from other boards. This eases maintenance quite a bit. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org --- ChangeLog v1-v2: - Rebase to latest U-Boot master as

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/7] dfu: DFU backend implementation

2012-08-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 04 August 2012 03:47:34 Marek Vasut wrote: Dear Mike Frysinger, On Thursday 02 August 2012 09:55:24 Lukasz Majewski wrote: Dear Mike Frysinger, On Tuesday 31 July 2012 02:36:59 Lukasz Majewski wrote: +int dfu_config_entities(char *env, char *interface, int num) +{

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] env_onenand: set ONENAND_MAX_ENV_SIZE to CONFIG_ENV_SIZE

2012-08-04 Thread David du Colombier
This fix prevents env_import() CRC to fail when CONFIG_ENV_SIZE is not equal to 4096 bytes It also prevents mtd-read and mtd-write to be incomplete when the environment is larger than 4096 bytes. Signed-off-by: David du Colombier 0in...@gmail.com --- common/env_onenand.c |2 +- 1

Re: [U-Boot] The way the list manages patch submission

2012-08-04 Thread Karl O. Pinc
Dear Wolfgang, On 08/04/2012 08:35:49 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: In message 1344041771.12337.2@mofo you wrote: The trouble is getting a patch message back from the list when you send a patch in. For example I sent Why would you want to get your own messages back? You already know what

Re: [U-Boot] The way the list manages patch submission

2012-08-04 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 08/04/2012 08:35:49 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Your registration in the mailing list has the nodupes flag set, which is documented as: Avoid duplicate copies of messages? When you are listed explicitly in the To: or Cc: headers of a list message, you can opt to not

Re: [U-Boot] The way the list manages patch submission

2012-08-04 Thread Karl O. Pinc
On 08/04/2012 11:58:23 AM, Karl O. Pinc wrote: FYI. I got the above message twice. Probably because you sent the message To: me and Cc:-ed the list instead of sending the message To: the list and cc:-ing me. No. I am wrong. I was confused. :-P Sorry. Karl k...@meme.com Free

Re: [U-Boot] Testing report for i.MX51 using Linaro/Ubuntu gcc 4.6.3 (from Precise repositories), libgcc, etc.

2012-08-04 Thread Rob Herring
On 08/02/2012 12:49 PM, Matt Sealey wrote: Marek Vasut insists I report this to the list, so here goes; Compiling a U-Boot for i.MX51 here (for the Efika MX) basically doesn't operate well. Among other things, we got data aborts in several places, most annoyingly sometime after

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] config: Always use GNU ld

2012-08-04 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thursday 02 August 2012 12:19:34 Otavio Salvador wrote: This patch makes sure that we always use the GNU ld. U-Boot uses certain construct e.g. OVERLAY which are not implemented in gold therefore it always needs GNU ld

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/5] mxs: reorganize source directory for easy sharing of code in i.MXS SoCs

2012-08-04 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: Most code can be shared between i.MX23 and i.MX28 as both are from i.MXS family; this source directory structure makes easy to share code among them. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br ping?

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/5] mxs: prefix register structs with 'mxs' prefix

2012-08-04 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br Ping? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 4/5] mxs: Reowork SPL to use 'mxs' prefix for methods

2012-08-04 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br Ping? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] MX28: use a clear name for DDR2 initialization

2012-08-04 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: The mx28 prefix has been added to the initialization data and function so it is clear by which SoC it is used as i.MX233 will have a specific one. While on that, we also change it to static. Signed-off-by: Otavio

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/5] mxs: prefix register structs with 'mxs' prefix

2012-08-04 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Otavio Salvador, Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/clock.c | 36 arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/mx28.c| 28 +++--- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/spl_lradc_init.c |4 +-

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/5] mxs: reorganize source directory for easy sharing of code in i.MXS SoCs

2012-08-04 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Otavio Salvador, Most code can be shared between i.MX23 and i.MX28 as both are from i.MXS family; this source directory structure makes easy to share code among them. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br Acked-by: Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de Best regards, Marek Vasut

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] MX28: use a clear name for DDR2 initialization

2012-08-04 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Otavio Salvador, The mx28 prefix has been added to the initialization data and function so it is clear by which SoC it is used as i.MX233 will have a specific one. While on that, we also change it to static. Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- Changes in v2: -

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] MX28: Check if we are using a valid VBUS for power initialization

2012-08-04 Thread Otavio Salvador
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- Changes in v2: - add comments - fix when we have vbus OR vdd5v - improve patch short description Changes in v3: - change short-description prefix arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/spl_power_init.c | 26 +++--- 1 file

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/5] mxs: prefix register structs with 'mxs' prefix

2012-08-04 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/clock.c | 36 arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/mx28.c| 28 +++--- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/spl_lradc_init.c |

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/5] mxs: prefix register structs with 'mxs' prefix

2012-08-04 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Otavio Salvador, On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/clock.c | 36 arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mxs/mx28.c| 28 +++---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] MX28: Check if we are using a valid VBUS for power initialization

2012-08-04 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Otavio Salvador, Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- Changes in v2: - add comments - fix when we have vbus OR vdd5v - improve patch short description Changes in v3: - change short-description prefix arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/mx28/spl_power_init.c | 26

Re: [U-Boot] The way the list manages patch submission

2012-08-04 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Karl, In message 1344099312.12337.4@mofo you wrote: the patch was not.) No getting around the moderation delay, just thought I'd mention it. Perhaps you could alter the list welcome message to note that the list is moderated. This won't help; nobody reads the instructions. :/ But

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] MX28: Check if we are using a valid VBUS for power initialization

2012-08-04 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Dear Otavio Salvador, Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- Changes in v2: - add comments - fix when we have vbus OR vdd5v - improve patch short description Changes in v3: - change short-description

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] MX28: Check if we are using a valid VBUS for power initialization

2012-08-04 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Otavio Salvador, On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Dear Otavio Salvador, Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br --- [...] - /* - * NOTE: In original IMX-Bootlets, this also checks for VBUSVALID, - * but their