Hi Arun,
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 07:11:19 +, Arun K. Varghese
avarg...@ikanos.com wrote:
Hi,
Issue.
---
1) Downloaded u-boot-2010.09 source code.
(u-boot-2010.09.tar.bz2http://ftp.denx.de/pub/u-boot/u-boot-2010.09.tar.bz2)
2) Some files, have version header information along with
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 15:11 +0400, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
With this change driver will benefit from existing phylib and thus
custom phy functionality implemented in the driver will go away:
* Instantiation of the driver is now much shorter - 2 parameters
instead of 4.
* Simplified phy
On 01/17/2014 07:43 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Michal,
Am 13.01.2014 09:23, schrieb Michal Simek:
On 01/13/2014 09:10 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Michael,
Am 13.01.2014 08:53, schrieb Michal Simek:
On 01/13/2014 08:32 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Michel,
Am 03.01.2014
Hi Tom,
look below.
On 01/18/2014 08:28 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Tom,
please pull some small fixes from u-boot-i2c.git
Thanks!
The following changes since commit 7f673c99c2d8d1aa21996c5b914f06d784b080ca:
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm (2014-01-10
In case of secure boot, boot from NAND is ramboot.
It was removed by some other commit. So defining it again.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal aneesh.ban...@freescale.com
---
include/configs/P1010RDB.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/P1010RDB.h
The workaround for IFC errata A003399 was not enabled
in case of secure boot. So, secure boot from NOR was not
working.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal aneesh.ban...@freescale.com
---
include/configs/P1010RDB.h | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
ISBC creates a LAW 0 entry for non PBL platforms, which is not
disabled before transferring the control to uboot.
The LAW 0 entry has to be disabled.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal aneesh.ban...@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S | 58
1
Good day!
I'm here again with short report.
As you said i changed my bootcmd to
*bootcmd=movi read kernel 0 4080;bootm 408*
with default bootargs options
bootargs=console=ttySAC1,115200n8 vmalloc=512M androidboot.console=ttySAC
And i see same result
[YSE5250@omv]# boot
reading
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 10:24 +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Tom,
look below.
On 01/18/2014 08:28 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Tom,
please pull some small fixes from u-boot-i2c.git
Thanks!
The following changes since commit 7f673c99c2d8d1aa21996c5b914f06d784b080ca:
On 01/20/2014 10:34 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 10:24 +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Tom,
look below.
On 01/18/2014 08:28 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Tom,
please pull some small fixes from u-boot-i2c.git
Thanks!
The following changes since commit
Hello Michal,
Am 20.01.2014 10:22, schrieb Michal Simek:
On 01/17/2014 07:43 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Michal,
Am 13.01.2014 09:23, schrieb Michal Simek:
On 01/13/2014 09:10 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Michael,
Am 13.01.2014 08:53, schrieb Michal Simek:
On 01/13/2014 08:32 AM,
This is only required for PIC relocation and doesn't apply to modern
PIE relocation which does data relocation as well as code.
init_sequence_r is just an array that consists of compile-time
adresses of init functions. Since this is basically an array of integers
(pointers to void to be more
Dear Aneesh Bansal,
In message 1390202676-8167-1-git-send-email-aneesh.ban...@freescale.com you
wrote:
T4/B4 SoC's have a different version of ISBC. The secure boot
functionality is different with the new version of ISBC
compared to the earlier SoC's. So the version information is added
in
Hello Tom
Updated pull request for u-boot-i2c, as the zynq patches had problems,
see:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2014-January/171352.html
So, here the correct pull-request:
The following changes since commit 7f673c99c2d8d1aa21996c5b914f06d784b080ca:
Merge branch 'master' of
Dear Aneesh Bansal,
In message 1390203451-8561-1-git-send-email-aneesh.ban...@freescale.com you
wrote:
T4/B4 SoC's have a different version of ISBC. The secure boot
functionality is different with the new version of ISBC
compared to the earlier SoC's. So the version information is added
in
Dear Arun,
In message 82cf479d9040c547849e3005e77f780024b...@svfrwexch1.ikanos.com you
wrote:
1) Downloaded u-boot-2010.09 source code.
(u-boot-2010.09.tar.bz2http://ftp.denx.de/pub/u-boot/u-boot-2010.09.tar.bz2)
2) Some files, have version header information along with the source code.
Dear Alexander Khryukin,
In message cabtoafz3e-ee3v73th6u4bjsqixu6sy3h1tdng2fx-phdf0...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
As you said i changed my bootcmd to
*bootcmd=movi read kernel 0 4080;bootm 408*
I really wonder which sort of U-Boot you are running. movi is not a
command present in
Hello Alexey,
diff --git a/common/board_r.c b/common/board_r.c
index 86ca1cb..3462590 100644
--- a/common/board_r.c
+++ b/common/board_r.c
@@ -903,9 +903,16 @@ init_fnc_t init_sequence_r[] = {
void board_init_r(gd_t *new_gd, ulong dest_addr)
{
+ int i;
This emits a warning if
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:36:03 -0700
Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 01/15/2014 07:55 AM, Alban Bedel wrote:
It seems two entries were merged in one when this file has been
created. The GPSLXAU entries is obviously a mix of GPU and SLXA which
are next to each other according
This is only required for PIC relocation and doesn't apply to modern
PIE relocation which does data relocation as well as code.
init_sequence_r is just an array that consists of compile-time
adresses of init functions. Since this is basically an array of integers
(pointers to void to be more
link to my u-boot https://github.com/fedya/u-boot-yse5250
Please change the boot command and include the commands
Changed to this
bootcmd=md 4080 10;imi 4080;bootm 4080
[YSE5250@omv]# boot
4080: 56190527 ba6b0d61 9850d952 08484800'..Va.k.R.P..HH.
40800010: 00800040 00800040
Hi, Scott:
After changing to u-boot.elf, it could be run in FVP model.
If I run ./Foundation_v8 --image ./u-boot.elf --cores=4
--no-secure-memory, Uboot could be run with FVP model.
But no ARM trusted firmware boot info appeared.
Such as:
Booting trusted firmware boot loader stage 1
..
If I
Hi Jagan and Marek,
On Friday, January 17, 2014 at 03:41:47 PM, Jagannadha Sutradharudu
Teki wrote:
- SPI_FLASH - SF
- ARRAY_SLOW - AS
- ARRAY_FAST - AF
- DUAL_OUTPUT_FAST - DOF
- DUAL_IO_FAST - DIOF
- QUAD_OUTPUT_FAST - QOF
- QUAD_IO_FAST - QIOF
Now this really makes the code
Hi Jagan,
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 at 09:06:31 PM, Jagannadha
Sutradharudu Teki
wrote:
- Used readable names for read/write command macros
- Added comments for the same
Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki
Hi Alexander,
link to my u-boot https://github.com/fedya/u-boot-yse5250
Please change the boot command and include the commands
Changed to this
bootcmd=md 4080 10;imi 4080;bootm 4080
[YSE5250@omv]# boot
4080: 56190527 ba6b0d61 9850d952 08484800'..Va.k.R.P..HH.
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote:
Hi Jagan and Marek,
On Friday, January 17, 2014 at 03:41:47 PM, Jagannadha Sutradharudu
Teki wrote:
- SPI_FLASH - SF
- ARRAY_SLOW - AS
- ARRAY_FAST - AF
- DUAL_OUTPUT_FAST - DOF
- DUAL_IO_FAST - DIOF
- QUAD_OUTPUT_FAST -
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote:
Hi Jagan,
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 at 09:06:31 PM, Jagannadha
Sutradharudu Teki
wrote:
- Used readable names for read/write command macros
- Added
-Original Message-
From: tiger...@viatech.com.cn [mailto:tiger...@viatech.com.cn]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 4:24 PM
To: Wood Scott-B07421; Sharma Bhupesh-B45370
Cc: feng...@phytium.com.cn; tr...@ti.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: Re: [U-Boot] how to get u-boot code with
methinks that the problem in kernel.
I can boot original android kernel from any place: emmc, SD, fat
partition, USB-device, etc.
2014/1/20 Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de
Hi Alexander,
link to my u-boot https://github.com/fedya/u-boot-yse5250
Please change the boot command and include the
Dear Alexander Khryukin,
On 01/20/2014 01:08 PM, Alexander Khryukin wrote:
methinks that the problem in kernel.
I can boot original android kernel from any place: emmc, SD, fat
partition, USB-device, etc.
well, maybe has your special u-boot special handling for your special
android kernel?
Hi,
I have a beagle board and want to create a u-boot that verifies the kernel
and rootfs before booting it. Any pointers on how it can be achieved will
be appreciated.
Rakesh
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
On Monday, January 20, 2014 at 12:46:07 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote:
Hi Jagan,
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 at 09:06:31 PM, Jagannadha
Sutradharudu Teki
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Monday, January 20, 2014 at 12:46:07 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote:
Hi Jagan,
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Saturday,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Monday, January 20, 2014 at 12:46:07 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote:
Hi Jagan,
On Sun,
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 at 09:49:11 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:07 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 at 09:06:30 PM, Jagannadha Sutradharudu
Teki
wrote:
- Used small names for dual_flash macros
- Updated
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 at 09:51:56 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 at 09:06:29 PM, Jagannadha Sutradharudu
Teki
wrote:
- Shrink spi_slave {}
- Shrink spi_flash_params {}
- Documentation for
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 at 09:51:56 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 at 09:06:29 PM, Jagannadha Sutradharudu
Teki
wrote:
- Shrink
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 at 09:49:11 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:07 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 at 09:06:30 PM, Jagannadha Sutradharudu
Teki
wrote:
- Used
Upon further inspection of relevant parts of the architecture, the
maximum SPL binary size is 220KiB.
Cc: Lokesh Vutla lokeshvu...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini tr...@ti.com
---
include/configs/am43xx_evm.h |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Hello Tom,
On 01/14/2014 09:19 AM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
Hi,
On 01/14/2014 08:15 AM, Piotr Wilczek wrote:
Universal uses only one adapter I2C_0.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Wilczek p.wilc...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
---
Updated bank configuration code to more readable.
Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki jaga...@xilinx.com
---
drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c | 22 --
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c
Updated the dual_flash documentation as it uses
mode_bits from spi drivers to inform the sf framework.
Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki jaga...@xilinx.com
Cc: Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de
---
doc/SPI/README.dual-flash | 5 +++--
doc/SPI/README.sf-features | 3 +++
2 files changed, 6
Shrinked spi_slave and spi_flash code with respect to added
flash features.
Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki (5):
sf: ops: Squash the malloc+memset combo
sf: Optimize flash features code
sf: Use mode_bits for dual_flash connection
doc: SPI: Update the dual_flash info
sf: Update bank
SF uses mode_bits from driver side for informing whether
flash can operated in single or dual connections.
Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki jaga...@xilinx.com
Cc: Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de
---
drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
From: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki jagannadha.sutradharudu-t...@xilinx.com
- Shrink spi_slave {}
- Shrink spi_flash_params {}
- Documentation for sf features
Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki jaga...@xilinx.com
Cc: Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de
---
doc/SPI/README.sf-features| 122
Squash the malloc()+memset() combo in favor of calloc().
Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki jaga...@xilinx.com
Cc: Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de
---
drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c | 7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c
Hi Jagan,
[...]
I don't think nothing much gone the readability with these updated:
CMD_READ_ARRAY_FAST has updated CMD_RD_FAST and it seems like easy to
understand. and anyway I have added comments for full name as well.
Comments in a far away place cannot compensate for self-explaining
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki
jagannadha.sutradharudu-t...@xilinx.com wrote:
Squash the malloc()+memset() combo in favor of calloc().
Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki jaga...@xilinx.com
Cc: Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de
---
drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c |
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki
jagannadha.sutradharudu-t...@xilinx.com wrote:
Squash the malloc()+memset() combo in favor of calloc().
Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Shouldn't you return -ENOMEM instead?
Yes - we can but anyway ret is -1 by default.
and sf code doesn't use -ve macros' as of now.
-1 is not an propriate return error value in this case.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Jagan Teki jagannadh.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Shouldn't you return -ENOMEM instead?
Yes - we can but anyway ret is -1 by default.
and sf code doesn't use -ve macros' as of now.
-1 is not
Hi Rakesh,
I have a beagle board and want to create a u-boot that verifies the kernel
and rootfs before booting it. Any pointers on how it can be achieved will
be appreciated.
You can start here by reading the provided documentation:
Signed-off-by: Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de
---
README | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/README b/README
index aea82be..edf5fe4 100644
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -2832,7 +2832,7 @@ CBFS (Coreboot Filesystem) support
CONFIG_RSA
Squash the malloc()+memset() combo in favor of calloc().
Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki jaga...@xilinx.com
---
Changes for v3:
- Use errno.h
Changes for v2:
- used debug()
drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c | 8 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
Updated bank configuration code to more readable.
Signed-off-by: Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki jaga...@xilinx.com
---
Changes for v3:
- remove bank_curr = 0 for non bank case
Changes for v2:
- none
drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c | 21 +++--
1 file changed, 11
This reverts commit f77a606a0602be5d1fe23e8dcdfa5defde51dfd7 as it
breaks 32bit initrd use as it uses #address-cells as '2'.
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br
---
common/fdt_support.c | 66 +---
1 file changed, 32
Hi Tom,
SF code optimized stuff and few fixes.
--
Thanks,
Jagan.
The following changes since commit 5c9038b6af1a93410af966999638eabb81efcd0f:
omap3_beagle: use omap3-beagle.dtb for the C4 revision (2014-01-17 11:03:04
-0500)
are available in the git repository at:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote:
Hi Rakesh,
I have a beagle board and want to create a u-boot that verifies the kernel
and rootfs before booting it. Any pointers on how it can be achieved will
be appreciated.
You can start here by reading the provided
On Monday, January 20, 2014 at 01:40:52 PM, rakesh ranjan wrote:
Hi,
I have a beagle board and want to create a u-boot that verifies the kernel
and rootfs before booting it. Any pointers on how it can be achieved will
be appreciated.
Rakesh
See doc/uImage.FIT/verified-boot.txt and
Dear Alexander,
In message CABtOAfzG3B-eis0nDOiYtdq2rig_wP6SF2_jz=nlww7gp+p...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
link to my u-boot https://github.com/fedya/u-boot-yse5250
Sorry, but I do not really care about out of tree code.
Changed to this
bootcmd=md 4080 10;imi 4080;bootm 4080
OK,
On Monday, January 20, 2014 at 06:53:58 PM, Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki wrote:
Hi Tom,
SF code optimized stuff and few fixes.
--
Thanks,
Jagan.
The following changes since commit
5c9038b6af1a93410af966999638eabb81efcd0f:
omap3_beagle: use omap3-beagle.dtb for the C4 revision
Hi Marek,
Waited your response since last couple of hours.!
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Monday, January 20, 2014 at 06:53:58 PM, Jagannadha Sutradharudu Teki
wrote:
Hi Tom,
SF code optimized stuff and few fixes.
--
Thanks,
Jagan.
The following
On 01/13/2014 07:50 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
Send RPC commands to the VideoCore to turn on the SDHCI and USB modules.
For SDHCI this isn't needed in practice, since the firmware already
turned on the power in order to load U-Boot. However, it's best to be
explicit. For USB, this is necessary,
Hello Sir,
I have a development board smdk6400.When i switch on my
power my lcd shows only white colour.and nothing boot please help me.
Hello Raheel,
On 01/20/2014 09:37 PM, Moon Moon wrote:
Hello Sir,
I have a development board smdk6400.When i switch on my
power my lcd shows only white colour.and nothing boot please help me.
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 14:55 +0530, Aneesh Bansal wrote:
In case of secure boot, boot from NAND is ramboot.
It was removed by some other commit. So defining it again.
In case of not-secure-boot, it's not ramboot.
What user of CONFIG_SYS_RAMBOOT are you concerned about? Many of them
look like
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 14:57 +0530, Aneesh Bansal wrote:
The workaround for IFC errata A003399 was not enabled
in case of secure boot. So, secure boot from NOR was not
working.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal aneesh.ban...@freescale.com
---
include/configs/P1010RDB.h | 3 +--
1 file changed,
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 14:57 +0530, Aneesh Bansal wrote:
ISBC creates a LAW 0 entry for non PBL platforms, which is not
disabled before transferring the control to uboot.
The LAW 0 entry has to be disabled.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Bansal aneesh.ban...@freescale.com
---
On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 13:08 +0530, Aneesh Bansal wrote:
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_secure_boot.h
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_secure_boot.h
index 4c7f0b1..db124df 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_secure_boot.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_secure_boot.h
@@
Fix the following checkpatch warning:-
WARNING: externs should be avoided in .c files
Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri m-kariche...@ti.com
---
common/cmd_ubifs.c |9 -
fs/ubifs/ubifs.h |7 +++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/cmd_ubifs.c
This patch add basic support for the architecture timer found on recent
ARMv7 based SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov vita...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri m-kariche...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/lib/Makefile |1 +
arch/arm/lib/arch_timer.c | 69
This patch introduces a configurable mechanism to disable subpage writes
in the DaVinci NAND driver.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov vita...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri m-kariche...@ti.com
---
drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c |3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git
The Texas Instruments Keystone SOC u-boot support requires some
common code modifications to be done before introducing the
support itself.
This series of patches makes these modifications.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov vita...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri m-kariche...@ti.com
Murali
This patch add support for gpimage format as a preparatory
patch for porting u-boot for keystone2 devices and is
based on omapimage format. It re-uses gph header to store the
size and loadaddr as done in omapimage.c
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov vita...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri
This patch extends the ubifs load implementation to return the size of
the file loaded from the filesystem. The ubifs command implementation
has also been modified to set the filesize environment variable
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov vita...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri
Dear Murali Karicheri,
In message 1390255810-19486-2-git-send-email-m-kariche...@ti.com you wrote:
This patch add support for gpimage format as a preparatory
patch for porting u-boot for keystone2 devices and is
based on omapimage format. It re-uses gph header to store the
size and loadaddr
The change to add 64bit initrd support broke 32bit initrd support as it
always set 64bits worth of data into the properties, even on 32bit
systems. The fix is to use addr_cell_len (which already says how much
data is in 'tmp') to set the property, rather than always setting 8.
Thanks to Stephen
Dear Murali Karicheri,
In message 1390255810-19486-5-git-send-email-m-kariche...@ti.com you wrote:
This patch add basic support for the architecture timer found on recent
ARMv7 based SoCs.
Are we adding dead code here? Or where exactly is this code being
used?
--- /dev/null
+++
Dear Murali Karicheri,
In message 1390255810-19486-6-git-send-email-m-kariche...@ti.com you wrote:
This patch introduces a configurable mechanism to disable subpage writes
in the DaVinci NAND driver.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov vita...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 09:24 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Prabhakar Kushwaha,
In message 1390028310-30861-1-git-send-email-prabha...@freescale.com you
wrote:
IFC registers can be of type Little Endian or big Endian depending upon
Freescale SoC. Here SoC defines the register type of
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:46:49PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Murali Karicheri,
In message 1390255810-19486-2-git-send-email-m-kariche...@ti.com you wrote:
This patch add support for gpimage format as a preparatory
patch for porting u-boot for keystone2 devices and is
based on
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 07:50:12PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
My original intention was to have a 100ms timeout. However, the timer
operations used return values in ms not us, so we ended up with a 100s
timeout instead. Fixing this exposes that some operations need longer
to operate than
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:26:24AM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote:
Hi Albert,
Commit 022298278 (mx6: soc: Disable VDDPU regulator) does not let boot
kernel with enabled GPU (i.MX6). It is unclear at the moment if the fix
should be done in U-Boot or in kernel, so it is better to revert it for
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 07:50:11PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
Send RPC commands to the VideoCore to turn on the SDHCI and USB modules.
For SDHCI this isn't needed in practice, since the firmware already
turned on the power in order to load U-Boot. However, it's best to be
explicit. For USB,
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:45:58AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Tom
Updated pull request for u-boot-i2c, as the zynq patches had problems,
see:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2014-January/171352.html
So, here the correct pull-request:
The following changes since commit
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 08:15:33AM +0800, Ma Haijun wrote:
Curently, we are using 32 bit multiplication to calculate the offset,
so the result will always be 32 bit.
This can silently cause file system corruption when performing a write
operation on partition larger than 4 GiB.
This patch
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 06:49:43AM +0800, Ma Haijun wrote:
It may cause file system corruption when do a write operation.
This issue only affects boards that use 32 bit lbaint_t.
Signed-off-by: Ma Haijun mahaij...@gmail.com
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signature.asc
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:00:08PM +0100, Ionut Nicu wrote:
For files where we actually have extent indexes following
an extent header (ext_block-eh_depth != 0), the do/while
loop from ext4fs_get_extent_block() does not select the
proper extent index structure.
For example, if we have:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:59:24AM +0100, Ionut Nicu wrote:
Using fs-blksz in ext4fs_get_extent_block() is not
correct since fs-blksz is not initialized on the
read path. Use EXT2_BLOCK_SIZE() instead which will
produce the desired output.
Signed-off-by: Ionut Nicu ioan.nicu@nsn.com
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:39:34AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:23:28AM -0600, Dan Murphy wrote:
The spl directory is ignored by git as these objects are created
during spl creation. The only file not created is the Makefile.
This file can be modified and checked in via git.
Due to the order of rule precedence having the
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 03:51:59PM +1300, Charles Manning wrote:
The summary already has other verification. This one is not needed.
The check caused summaries to be ignored if they were not on the
numbered block. This caused problems when a summary was embedded in an
image and the image is
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 08:15:07AM +0100, Piotr Wilczek wrote:
Universal uses only one adapter I2C_0.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Wilczek p.wilc...@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
Acked-by: Przemyslaw Marczak p.marc...@samsung.com
Applied to u-boot/master,
On Monday, January 20, 2014 at 02:32:27 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 at 09:51:56 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:09 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
On Saturday, January 18, 2014 at
Hey all,
I've pushed v2014.01 out to the repository and tarballs should exist
soon.
As always, lots of nice little fixes here and there and everywhere. One
big change of note this release is initial arm64 (aka aarch64) support.
It's a little rough around the edges with respect to passing data
Hi, Bhupesh:
U-boot doesn't have ARM trusted firmware support as of now. U-boot for
ARMv8 starts in EL3,
whereas UEFI starts in EL2 as trusted firmware itself is working in
EL3.
Do you mean: when FVP run, the first instruction would be fetched from
u-boot.elf?
Best wishes,
On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 16:19 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
For KVM we have a special PV machine type called ppce500. This machine
is inspired by the MPC8544DS board, but implements a lot less features
than that one.
It also provides more PCI slots and is supposed to be enumerated by
device
On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 16:19 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
With the qemu-ppce500 machine type we can run the same board with
either an e500v2 or an e500mc core plugged in.
This means that the IVOR setup can't be based on compile time decisions,
so instead we have to do a runtime check which
Dear Scott,
In message 1390258263.24905.337.ca...@snotra.buserror.net you wrote:
As is, you are only adding dead code, as there is no place anywhere in
the mainline code that defines CONFIG_SYS_FSL_IFC_LE
Yes, consider it RFC until we have patches for a target that needs LE.
This
Dear Scott,
In message 20140121054228.de994382...@gemini.denx.de I wrote:
I fear that more IP blocks will follow that have similar requirements,
and if we implemnt similar wrappers for each of them separately, we
will have a mess of hard to maintain code. For example, it will then
be
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
