Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] drivers/i2c/fsl_i2c: modify i2c_read to handle multi-byte write

2014-04-21 Thread Shaveta
Heiko Schocher hs at denx.de writes: Hmm? Is this v2 of the following patch?: [U-Boot] 2c: modify i2c_read API to handle multi-bytes writes http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/336911/ If so, please stick to the follow rules, for sending updated patches:

Re: [U-Boot] [GIT PULL] u-boot-mips/master

2014-04-21 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi Tom, On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 13:28:53 +0200 Daniel Schwierzeck daniel.schwierz...@gmail.com wrote: The following changes since commit b149c4c399b111cec1ff7505ca9fabbeeb4fe394: ARM:tegra20: Remove aes debug prints (2014-04-18 16:14:17 -0400) are available in the git repository at:

Re: [U-Boot] [GIT PULL] u-boot-mips/master

2014-04-21 Thread Daniel Schwierzeck
2014-04-21 10:37 GMT+02:00 Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com: diff --git a/doc/README.scrapyard b/doc/README.scrapyard index 7d67033..32c85ad 100644 --- a/doc/README.scrapyard +++ b/doc/README.scrapyard @@ -114,3 +114,4 @@ PCIPPC2 powerpc MPC740/MPC750 7c9e89b

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/5] MAINTAINERS.boards: add initial version

2014-04-21 Thread Daniel Schwierzeck
2014-04-21 6:03 GMT+02:00 Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com: Weird. - board/xilinx/zynq_microzed/ - board/xilinx/zynq_zc70x/ - board/xilinx/zynq_zc770/ - board/xilinx/zynq_zed/ do not exist. The board directory for Zynq series is board/xilinx/zynq/ I guess there's got to

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sandbox: move source files from board/ to arch/sandbox/

2014-04-21 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Prior to commit 33a02da0, all boards must have board/${BOARD}/ or board/${VENDOR}/${BOARD}/ directory. Now this rule is obsolete. It looks weird that sandbox defines vendor and board just for meeting the old U-Boot directory structure. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com Cc:

Re: [U-Boot] [GIT PULL] u-boot-mips/master

2014-04-21 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi Daniel, Tom, a conflict will happen anyway when pulling u-boot-mips/master. why? The branch is rebased to current master so it would be a fast-forward merge. Sorry, my misunderstanding. I was seeing your patch file: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2014-April/177675.html You had

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sandbox: ignore sandbox.dtb

2014-04-21 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com Cc: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org --- arch/sandbox/dts/.gitignore | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) create mode 100644 arch/sandbox/dts/.gitignore diff --git a/arch/sandbox/dts/.gitignore b/arch/sandbox/dts/.gitignore new file mode

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/5] MAINTAINERS.boards: add initial version

2014-04-21 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi Daniel, ok. I can think of two options: - keep the alphabetical order and use S: Orphan (since September, 2013) - move the orphan boards to the bottom and add those separator comments Which one do you prefer? I prefer - keep the alphabetical order and use S: Orphan (since September,

[U-Boot] [PATCH v9 0/2] S5P: Exynos: Add GPIO numbering feature

2014-04-21 Thread Akshay Saraswat
Used a script to recheck/verify pin mapping and existing mapping appears to be fine, returning correct bank and pin values. Did ./MAKEALL -a arm and found all Exynos/S5P related boards compiled successfully. Couldn't test booting over all of them. Tested U-Boot bootup over SMDK5420, SMDK5250,

[U-Boot] [PATCH v9 2/2] S5P: Exynos: Config: Enable Generic GPIO and CMD configs

2014-04-21 Thread Akshay Saraswat
Enabling configs for GPIO CMD and Generic GPIO in case of S5P and Exynos target boards. Also, doing modifications in the config definitions wherever required due to change in gpio macros pin numbering enums. Signed-off-by: Rajeshwari Shinde rajeshwar...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Revert build: Use filechk rules to create and update u-boot.lds

2014-04-21 Thread Jon Loeliger
On 04/20/2014 09:33 PM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: This reverts commit a8b993eb81c142a439c24b871a2317f765fe5397. Commit a8b993eb claims it fixes u-boot.lds rule by replacing $(call if_changed) with $(call filechk). But the problem had already been fixed by commit 395e60cd a few days before commit

Re: [U-Boot] config: enable CONFIG_API in distro config

2014-04-21 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 09:55:53 -0700 Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Dennis, On 19 April 2014 08:42, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 19 Apr 2014 15:01:40 +0100 Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk wrote: On Fri,

[U-Boot] patchwork down again?

2014-04-21 Thread York Sun
Does anyone have a problem accessing patchwork? York ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ti/master

2014-04-21 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
-Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Rini, Tom Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 9:25 AM To: Albert Aribaud; u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ti/master Hey, The following changes since commit

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/14] Split out code from the enormous main.c

2014-04-21 Thread Simon Glass
Hi, On 10 April 2014 20:01, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: A previous series created a way of using if () instead of #ifdef for controlling feature inclusion in U-Boot. The primary target of that series was common/main.c which is full of #ifdefs. That work was put on hold while the

Re: [U-Boot] config: enable CONFIG_API in distro config

2014-04-21 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Dennis, On 21 April 2014 08:49, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote: On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 09:55:53 -0700 Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: [snip] Can you suggest a starting point for trying this out on am ARM platform? (e.g. OMAP, Tegra, Exynos) I'd like to see how it works. as

Re: [U-Boot] config: enable CONFIG_API in distro config

2014-04-21 Thread Stephen Warren
On 04/21/2014 11:57 AM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Dennis, On 21 April 2014 08:49, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us mailto:den...@ausil.us wrote: On Sun, 20 Apr 2014 09:55:53 -0700 Simon Glass s...@chromium.org mailto:s...@chromium.org wrote: [snip] Can you suggest a starting

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/11] MX6: add struct for sharing data between SPL and uboot

2014-04-21 Thread Tim Harvey
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Igor Grinberg grinb...@compulab.co.il wrote: On 04/18/14 09:35, Tim Harvey wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote: Hi Igor, hi Tim On 17/04/2014 13:22, Igor Grinberg wrote: get_ram_size() works on cm-fx6 all DRAM

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/5] MAINTAINERS.boards: add initial version

2014-04-21 Thread Daniel Schwierzeck
Dear Wolfgang, 2014-04-20 23:26 GMT+02:00 Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de: Dear Daniel Schwierzeck, In message 1398027454-20399-4-git-send-email-daniel.schwierz...@gmail.com you wrote: MAINTAINERS.boards is generated from boards.cfg at commit b149c4c. Signed-off-by: Daniel Schwierzeck

Re: [U-Boot] pull request for u-boot-tegra/master into ARM/master

2014-04-21 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Tom, On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 09:08:50 -0700, Tom Warren twarren.nvi...@gmail.com wrote: Albert, Please pull u-boot-tegra/master into ARM/master. Thanks! ./MAKEALL -s tegra AOK, checkpatch.pl is OK, and ./MAKEALL -a arm only shows failures that were already present in ARM/master. The

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ti/master

2014-04-21 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Tom, On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 09:24:36 -0400, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote: Hey, The following changes since commit 1b82491ee6ee1e986e5521b33692a00e1f38fe75: board:tricorder: fixup SPL OOB layout (2014-04-11 10:08:42 -0400) are available in the git repository at:

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: tegra: fix CPU VDD comment in Tegra30 CPU init code

2014-04-21 Thread Stephen Warren
From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com The register writes performed by arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra30/cpu.c enable_cpu_power_rail() set the voltage to 1.0V not 1.4V as the comment implies. Fix the comment. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com --- arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/tegra30/cpu.c |

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sandbox: move source files from board/ to arch/sandbox/

2014-04-21 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Masahiro, On 21 April 2014 03:39, Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com wrote: Prior to commit 33a02da0, all boards must have board/${BOARD}/ or board/${VENDOR}/${BOARD}/ directory. Now this rule is obsolete. It looks weird that sandbox defines vendor and board just for meeting the

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/5] MAINTAINERS.boards: add initial version

2014-04-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Daniel, In message CACUy__UwW=4k0cwcvhhzb8ju-_fj1ca5tnyh8e-pf9e...@mail.gmail.com you wrote: I understand your intentions, but I have to admit that I seriously dislike this approach. It has been quite a long way to come up with boards.cfg, which would attempt to colect all

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/5] Android Fastboot support

2014-04-21 Thread Marek Vasut
On Friday, April 18, 2014 at 06:14:26 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Rob, In message 1397829272-22266-1-git-send-email-robherri...@gmail.com you wrote: I dropped the patch adding a loadsize env variable and added config uptions instead to set the fastboot buffer size. Thanks, but...

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] usb:gadget:f_thor: code cleanup in function download_tail()

2014-04-21 Thread Marek Vasut
On Friday, April 18, 2014 at 09:48:24 AM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote: In thor's download_tail() function, dfu_get_entity() is called before each dfu_write() call and the returned entity pointers are the same. So dfu_get_entity() can be called just once and this patch changes this.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] usb:gadget:f_thor: fix write to filesystem by add dfu_flush()

2014-04-21 Thread Marek Vasut
On Friday, April 18, 2014 at 09:48:25 AM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote: Since dfu read/write operations needs to be flushed manually, writing to filesystem on MMC by thor was broken. MMC raw write actually is working fine because current dfu_flush() function writes filesystem only. This commit

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sandbox: ignore sandbox.dtb

2014-04-21 Thread Simon Glass
On 21 April 2014 03:50, Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com wrote: Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com Cc: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org Thanks. Acked-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org ___ U-Boot mailing list

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mtd: denali: improve nand_read_oob and fix nand_write_oob

2014-04-21 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 20:30 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: [2] Make denali_read_oob() 10x faster. One of the fatal issues of v7 is nand bad command is extremely slow. This is the benchmark of v7 = time nand bad Device 0 bad blocks: time: 11.300 seconds, 11300 ticks It is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] config: enable CMD_BMP when API+LCD is enabled

2014-04-21 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Stephen, On 18 April 2014 11:15, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote: From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com When both CONFIG_API and CONFIG_LCD are enabled, the API code calls lcd_display_bitmap(). That isn't compiled unless either CONFIG_CMD_BMP or CONFIG_SPLASH_SCREEN is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sandbox: move source files from board/ to arch/sandbox/

2014-04-21 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi Simon, On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 15:02:20 -0600 Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Hi Masahiro, On 21 April 2014 03:39, Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com wrote: Prior to commit 33a02da0, all boards must have board/${BOARD}/ or board/${VENDOR}/${BOARD}/ directory. Now this rule

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mtd: denali: improve nand_read_oob and fix nand_write_oob

2014-04-21 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi Scott, It is really really painful to wait more than 10 seconds just for bad block scanning to boot Linux. Making bad block scans faster is a good thing, but why do you need to scan them just to boot Linux? Aren't you using an on-flash BBT? I did not know that. I thought all blocks

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Revert build: Use filechk rules to create and update u-boot.lds

2014-04-21 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi Jon, What is worse is $(call filechk) is too strong to fix the problem and looks weird. I'm sure I don't understand that critique at all. Looks weird? The linker script is processed by C-preprocessor. It means the dependency of included files should be tracked to decide if the

[U-Boot] Some PowerPC boards are broken

2014-04-21 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi. I found 6 PowerPC boards are broken: MPC8572DS MPC8572DS_36BIT dlvision-10g io iocon neo Section overlap error occurrs. powerpc-linux-ld.bfd: section .resetvec loaded at [fffc,] overlaps section .u_boot_list loaded at [faec,000102ef]