Re: [U-Boot] i.MX6Q USB OTG Gadget and Fastboot?

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Adam Ford wrote: > I am trying to add in Android Fastboot to my i.MX6Q. > > I am using DM_USB to enable the USB through the device tree. This > device tree works in Linux, so I am assumming I've missed some > configuration somewhere: > > I've

[U-Boot] i.MX6Q USB OTG Gadget and Fastboot?

I am trying to add in Android Fastboot to my i.MX6Q. I am using DM_USB to enable the USB through the device tree. This device tree works in Linux, so I am assumming I've missed some configuration somewhere: I've added the following the defconfig file: +CONFIG_CMD_USB=y +CONFIG_DM_USB=y

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] powerpc: Partialy restore core of mpc8xx

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 09:20:19PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Christophe, > > In message <20170630190420.horde.wz1ezqqb1mporrqdyjko...@messagerie.c-s.fr> > you wrote: > > > > I did rebase it to the mainline a few minutes before sending it. > > Did you apply 4xx removal patch first ? I

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] powerpc: Partialy restore core of mpc8xx

Dear Christophe, In message <20170630190420.horde.wz1ezqqb1mporrqdyjko...@messagerie.c-s.fr> you wrote: > > I did rebase it to the mainline a few minutes before sending it. > Did you apply 4xx removal patch first ? I wrote it in the patch after > the ---, it is the way we do it in Linux,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] powerpc: Partialy restore core of mpc8xx

Wolfgang Denk a écrit : Dear Christophe, In message <20170629165215.9672c67...@pc13941vm.idsi0.si.c-s.fr> you wrote: This commit partially restores support for the 8xx, with the following limitations: Hmm... may I ask what you use as reference for this patch? It appears I

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] test: overlay: Add unit test for stacked overlay

Verify that stacked overlays work. Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou --- test/overlay/Makefile | 1 + test/overlay/cmd_ut_overlay.c | 34 ++- test/overlay/test-fdt-overlay-stacked.dts | 21

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] fdt: Allow stacked overlays phandle references

This patch enables an overlay to refer to a previous overlay's labels by performing a merge of symbol information at application time. In a nutshell it allows an overlay to refer to a symbol that a previous overlay has defined. It requires both the base and all the overlays to be compiled with

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] fit: Introduce methods for applying overlays on fit-load

Introduce an overlay based method for constructing a base DT blob to pass to the kernel. Both canned and runtime feature selection is supported. Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou --- common/image-fdt.c | 7 +- common/image-fit.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] libfdt.h: Introduce FDT_PATH_MAX

Introduce FDT_PATH_MAX Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou --- lib/libfdt/libfdt.h | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/libfdt/libfdt.h b/lib/libfdt/libfdt.h index 2f7ebf8..c369015 100644 --- a/lib/libfdt/libfdt.h +++ b/lib/libfdt/libfdt.h @@

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] libfdt_env.h: Add in libfdt environment

Overlays require malloc so add it in the libfdt environment. Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou --- include/libfdt_env.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/include/libfdt_env.h b/include/libfdt_env.h index 6c6845f..59463c0 100644 ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5] uboot overlays and FIT image

This patch allows uboot to handle overlays in a manner that uses a base DT blob and an arbitrary number of DT overlays blobs. It is intended to be used with FIT images since handling a multitude of device tree blobs manually is a chore. The first 3 patches have already been submitted to DTC for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] powerpc: remove 4xx support

Hi On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > I also recall this. Ricardo? Do you still have interest here? > Otherwise I'm going to remove these soon, thanks! This also makes me quite sad. It has been my first big contribution to OS. I personally do not have

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] powerpc: remove 4xx support

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 03:50:28PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > I also recall this. Ricardo? Do you still have interest here? > > Otherwise I'm going to remove these soon, thanks! > > This also

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] km/common: remove unused code

Hello Holger, Am 30.06.2017 um 15:33 schrieb Holger Brunck: The 82xx board mgcoge3ne was removed from the codebase, so this is dead code. Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck Cc: Heiko Schocher --- board/keymile/common/common.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3

[U-Boot] [PATCH] km/common: remove unused code

The 82xx board mgcoge3ne was removed from the codebase, so this is dead code. Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck Cc: Heiko Schocher --- board/keymile/common/common.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/keymile/common/common.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] powerpc, 8xx: Implement GLL2 ERRATA

Dear Christophe Leroy, In message <8947f895b86efe0396b1825998a64a3340fff597.1498751837.git.christophe.le...@c-s.fr> you wrote: > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy > --- > arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc8xx/cpu_init.c | 10 ++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] powerpc: Partialy restore core of mpc8xx

Dear Christophe, In message <20170629165215.9672c67...@pc13941vm.idsi0.si.c-s.fr> you wrote: > > This commit partially restores support for the 8xx, with the > following limitations: checkpatch complains about this patch like this: total: 97 errors, 714 warnings, 87 checks, 6380 lines

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] powerpc: Partialy restore core of mpc8xx

Dear Christophe, In message <20170629165215.9672c67...@pc13941vm.idsi0.si.c-s.fr> you wrote: > > This commit partially restores support for the 8xx, with the > following limitations: Hmm... may I ask what you use as reference for this patch? It appears I cannot apply it to curent mainline: ->

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] powerpc: Restore core of mpc8xx

Dear Christophe, In message <7335469c-1e12-c59c-4ac4-3fda0f665...@c-s.fr> you wrote: > > > 8xx is gone. Please get used to that fact. > > Yes he is gone by accident, lets get it back as some orphan boards need it. This discussionis useless, but please understand that this was in no way an

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH next 1/3] mx6: soc: Move mxs_dma_init() into the mxs nand driver

Hi Stefano, On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > I agree with you, the rest requires more cleanup and should be done in > separate patches. Great, so I will submit the Kconfig cleanups separately as suggested. Thanks

Re: [U-Boot] [GIT PULL] Please pull u-boot-mmc master

Hi Tom, On 06/30/2017 07:48 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:48:20PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > >> Dear Tom, >> >> Could you pull these patches into u-boot/master? >> If there is a problem, let me know, plz. >> >> The following changes since commit

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH next 1/3] mx6: soc: Move mxs_dma_init() into the mxs nand driver

Hi Fabio, On 30/06/2017 13:21, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 5:51 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > >> But if this is the case, should we not also add a dependency in Kconfig >> for NAND_MXS, selecting automatically APBH_DMA ? >> >> config NAND_MXS >>

[U-Boot] Does U-boot allow snapshot restoration?

Hi all, This is Shiwen, good morning! :) I wan to do fast boot for arm , but I am not familiar with U-boot, as title says, I'm curious that U-boot for smdk2410 allow snapshot restoration? If allowed, can you tell me witch function do this work? Any advice will be appreciated, thanks. Have a

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] mkimage: fix display of image types list

Since commit 5b9d44df2307f (mkimage: Display a better list of available image types) mkimage usage text suggest to "use -T to see a list of available image types". Unfortunately, commit 02221f29deb8 (mkimage: Convert to use getopt()) broke that feature, because getopt() fails when -T has no option

Re: [U-Boot] mkimage: fix display of image types list

Hi Tom, On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:00:55AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 09:19:43PM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote: > > Since commit 5b9d44df2307f (mkimage: Display a better list of available > > image > > types) mkimage usage text suggest to "use -T to see a list of available > >

Re: [U-Boot] [GIT PULL] Please pull u-boot-mmc master

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 12:48:20PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > Dear Tom, > > Could you pull these patches into u-boot/master? > If there is a problem, let me know, plz. > > The following changes since commit 08546df976b79b1694af3ff12b26baf2931f371a: > > Merge git://git.denx.de/u-boot-x86

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH next 3/3] mx6sabreauto: Update to SPL only mode

On 29/06/2017 14:33, Vanessa Maegima wrote: > As mx6sabreauto supports SPL now, all variants can boot using the same > defconfig. > > This patch: > - Removes non-SPL targets. > - Renames target to mx6sabreauto_defconfig. > - Renames folder and board files to mx6sabreauto. > - Updates MAINTAINERS,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH next 2/3] mx6qsabreauto: Add SPL support

On 29/06/2017 14:33, Vanessa Maegima wrote: > Add support for mx6q, mx6dl and mx6qp sabreauto boards in SPL. > > Retrieved the mx6q DCD table from: > board/freescale/mx6qsabreauto/imximage.cfg > > Retrieved the mx6dl DCD table from: > board/freescale/mx6qsabreauto/mx6dl.cfg > > Retrieved the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH next 1/3] mx6: soc: Move mxs_dma_init() into the mxs nand driver

Hi Vanessa, hi Fabio, On 29/06/2017 14:33, Vanessa Maegima wrote: > From: Fabio Estevam > > Currently the following build error is seen when a board using MMC SPL > is built and the MXS nand driver is also selected: > > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/built-in.o: In function

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V7 4/4] rockchip: rk3288: enable rockusb support on rk3288 based device

Hi Eddie, > 2017-06-29 18:49 GMT+08:00 Lukasz Majewski : > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 08:44:47 +0800 > > Eddie Cai wrote: > > > >> > > >> > The issue is not with this one particular board. > >> > > >> > I'm concerned, since your patch set causes build errors

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] powerpc: Restore core of mpc8xx

Hello Heiko, Le 30/06/2017 à 06:15, Heiko Schocher a écrit : Hello Christophe, Am 29.06.2017 um 18:51 schrieb Christophe LEROY: Dear Wolfgang, Le 23/06/2017 à 14:11, Wolfgang Denk a écrit : Dear Christophe, In message <71d351cb-2c42-99a0-0b4b-64cfa74ec...@c-s.fr> you wrote: Ok, noted.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/16] usb: Remove unnecessary work in usb_setup_descriptor()

Hi Lothar, On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Lothar Waßmann wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 11:49:56 +0800 Bin Meng wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Bin Meng wrote: >> > The only work we need do in usb_setup_descriptor() is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/16] usb: Remove unnecessary work in usb_setup_descriptor()

Hi, On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 11:49:56 +0800 Bin Meng wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Bin Meng wrote: > > The only work we need do in usb_setup_descriptor() is to initialize > > dev->descriptor.bMaxPacketSize0, when do_read is false. Other steps > > are the same