[PULL next] u-boot-at91-2023.04-a

Hello Tom, Please pull tag u-boot-at91-2023.04-a , the first set of at91 features for the next cycle 2023.04. This feature set includes the new DM-based NAND flash driver (old non-DM driver is still kept for backwards compatibility), and the move to DM NAND flash driver for sam9x60ek board.

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add basic reset driver for assert/deassert operations

On 1/4/23 16:03, Sergiu Moga wrote: > This patch series originates from: > https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2022-December/502865.html > > Implement a basic driver to enable assert/deassert operations. > > v1 -> v2: > - rebase on u-boot next > > Cristian Birsan (1): >ARM: at91: add

Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Add DT USB definitions for SAM9X60, SAMA5D2 and SAMA7

On 1/4/23 16:04, Sergiu Moga wrote: > This patch series originates from the bigger patch series: > https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2022-December/502865.html > > Add the basic DT USB definitions for SAM9X60, SAMA5D2 and SAMA7. The > required pinctrl definitions have been added as well as

Re: [PATCH 1/6] ARM: dts: sam9x60: Add OHCI and EHCI DT nodes

On 1/4/23 11:38, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 1/4/23 08:30, eugen.hris...@microchip.com wrote: >> On 1/3/23 01:12, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> On 12/23/22 13:33, Sergiu Moga wrote: Add the OHCI and EHCI DT nodes for the sam9x60 boards. Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga ---   

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Add DT USB definitions for SAM9X60, SAMA5D2 and SAMA7

On 1/3/23 17:35, Sergiu Moga wrote: > This patch series originates from the bigger patch series: > https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2022-December/502865.html > > Add the basic DT USB definitions for SAM9X60, SAMA5D2 and SAMA7. The > required pinctrl definitions have been added as well as

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: at91: sam9x60: add sdhci1 node and pinctrl

On 12/23/22 08:47, Mihai Sain wrote: > Add node for sdhci1 controller and its pinctrl. > > Signed-off-by: Mihai Sain > --- Applied to u-boot-at91/next, thanks !

Re: [PATCH] configs: sam9x60: add mmc config for sdmmc1

On 12/23/22 08:43, Mihai Sain wrote: > Add new config for storing environment from SDMMC1. > > Signed-off-by: Mihai Sain > --- Applied to u-boot-at91/next, thanks !

Re: [[PATCH] board: at91: sam9x60: set blue led on at boot time

On 12/23/22 08:39, Mihai Sain wrote: > Set blue led on at boot time in order to highlight that u-boot is loaded. > This is done for all sam9x60 based boards which contain an RGB led. > > Signed-off-by: Mihai Sain > --- Applied to u-boot-at91/next, thanks !

Re: [PATCH 1/6] ARM: dts: sam9x60: Add OHCI and EHCI DT nodes

On 1/3/23 01:12, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 12/23/22 13:33, Sergiu Moga wrote: >> Add the OHCI and EHCI DT nodes for the sam9x60 boards. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga >> --- >>   arch/arm/dts/at91-sam9x60_curiosity.dts | 21 + >>   arch/arm/dts/sam9x60.dtsi   | 18

Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] ARM: dts: sam9x60: Add OHCI and EHCI DT nodes

On 1/3/23 18:00, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 1/3/23 16:56, sergiu.m...@microchip.com wrote: >> On 03.01.2023 17:47, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> On 1/3/23 16:35, Sergiu Moga wrote: Add the OHCI and EHCI DT nodes for the sam9x60 SoC's. Signed-off-by: Sergiu Moga --- v1 -> v2:

Re: [PATCH v5 00/19] Add USB on SAM9X60, SAMA7G5 and SAMA5D2 boards

On 12/22/22 18:11, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 12/22/22 16:54, sergiu.m...@microchip.com wrote: >> On 22.12.2022 15:36, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> On 12/22/22 11:53, Sergiu Moga wrote: This series of patches is meant to add support for USB Mass Storage on SAM9X60, SAMA7G5 and SAMA5D2 boards and

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: add at91-usart.h from Linux

On 11/25/22 10:29, Claudiu Beznea - M18063 wrote: > On 25.11.2022 09:54, Eugen Hristev wrote: >> Copy include file dt-bindings/mfd/at91-usart.h from Linux >> >> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev > > Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea > Applied series to u-boot-at91/next , thanks !

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2: fix wrong interrupt-cells property

On 12/12/22 12:07, Claudiu Beznea - M18063 wrote: > On 12.12.2022 11:59, Eugen Hristev wrote: >> The PMC node is not an interrupt provider, so it must not have >> interrupt-cells. >> >> This fixes the warning (on newer DTC): >> arch/arm/dts/sama5d2.dtsi:82.22-602.6: Warning (interrupt_provider):

Re: [PATCH] ARM: mach-at91: add support for sama7g5 chip id and extended id definition

On 12/2/22 09:47, Mihai Sain wrote: > Add SAMA7G5 series chip id definitions to align with linux SoC driver. > Add support for SAMA7G5 System-In-Package (SIP): > SAMA7G54D1G, SAMA7G54D2G, SAMA7G54D4G. > > Signed-off-by: Mihai Sain > --- Applied to u-boot-at91/next , thanks !

Re: [PATCH] lds: align u-boot-nodtb with 8 bytes boundary

On 12/18/22 01:59, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Saturday 17 December 2022 23:54:40 Pali Rohár wrote: >> On Saturday 17 December 2022 23:04:08 Pali Rohár wrote: >>> On Saturday 17 December 2022 14:40:44 Simon Glass wrote: Hi Pali, On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 16:13, Pali Rohár wrote: >

Re: [PATCH] lds: align u-boot-nodtb with 8 bytes boundary

On 12/15/22 16:24, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Eugen, > > On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 03:58, Eugen Hristev > wrote: >> >> Newer DTC require that the DTB start address is aligned at 8 bytes. >> In the u-boot.bin case, the u-boot-nodtb.bin is concatenated with the >> DTB, but there is no alignment/padding

Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Add DM support for atmel NAND driver

On 12/8/22 18:18, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 5:12 PM wrote: >> >> On 10/25/22 13:51, Balamanikandan Gunasundar wrote: >>> Change include: >>> >>> - Adapt GPIO descriptor apis for U-Boot. Use >>> gpio_request_by_name_nodev, dm_gpio_get_value etc. >>> -

Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] Add DM support for atmel NAND driver

On 10/25/22 13:51, Balamanikandan Gunasundar wrote: > Change include: > > - Adapt GPIO descriptor apis for U-Boot. Use >gpio_request_by_name_nodev, dm_gpio_get_value etc. > - Use U_BOOT_DRIVER instead of platform_driver. > - Replace struct platform_device with struct udevice > - Check the

[PULL] u-boot-at91-fixes-2023.01-b

Hello Tom, Please pull tag u-boot-at91-fixes-2023.01-b , the second set of at91 fixes for the 2023.01 cycle. This is a single tiny fix that allows the correct name for one pin on sama7g5 device. People with DT coming from Linux will have build errors without this if they add NAND device.

Re: [PATCH 00/18] Add USB on SAM9X60, SAMA7G5 and SAMA5D2 boards

On 12/7/22 15:14, Sergiu Moga wrote: > This series of patches is meant to add support for USB Mass Storage > on SAM9X60, SAMA7G5 and SAMA5D2 boards and register ohci-at91 driver into > Driver Model. In order for this to be achieved, the respective > DT nodes have been added, the USB clock has been

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: at91: sama7g5: fix signal name of pin PD8

On 11/14/22 17:10, Mihai Sain wrote: > The signal name of pin PD8 with function D is A22_NANDCLE > as it is defined in the datasheet. > > Fixes: 558378a4cd ("ARM: mach-at91: add support for new SoC sama7g5") > Signed-off-by: Mihai Sain > --- Applied to u-boot-at91/master, thanks !

[PULL] u-boot-at91-fixes-2023.01-a

Hello Tom, Please pull tag u-boot-at91-fixes-2023.01-a , the first set of at91 fixes for the 2023.01 cycle. This small fixes set includes an indentation fix for sam9x60 DT and one name for one pin for sama7g5. Thanks, Eugen The following changes since commit

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: at91: sama7g5: fix signal name of pin PB2

On 10/17/22 11:37 AM, Mihai Sain wrote: > The signal name of pin PB2 with function F is FLEXCOM11_IO1 > as it is defined in the datasheet. > > Fixes: 558378a4cd ("ARM: mach-at91: add support for new SoC sama7g5") > Signed-off-by: Mihai Sain > --- Applied to u-boot-at91/master , thanks !

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: at91: sam9x60ek: fix indentation for pinctrl sub-nodes

On 9/20/22 11:43 AM, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 10:33 AM Dario Binacchi > wrote: >> >> The indentation went far on the right due to an extra tab for >> each pinctrl sub-nodes. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi >> --- >> >> arch/arm/dts/sam9x60ek.dts

[PULL next] u-boot-at91-2023.01-a

Hello Tom, Please pull tag u-boot-2023.01-a , the first set of new at91 features for the next cycle 2023.01 . This feature set includes the important update on PIO4 pinctrl driver that solves a long time mismatch between Linux and U-boot, related on the unification of pinctrl and gpio driver

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Align sama5 and sama7 DT's with Linux

On 9/1/22 5:22 PM, Sergiu Moga wrote: > This has been done in order to align the DT of U-Boot with the DT > of Linux. In Linux, a phandle from a '-gpio' DT property is linked > to the pinctrl driver, a single driver that handles both pinctrl > settings and offers GPIO API to callers. On the other

Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: sam9x60: change parent clock from mck_pres to mck_div

On 8/18/22 12:07 PM, Claudiu Beznea - M18063 wrote: > On 17.08.2022 10:04, Eugen Hristev wrote: >> From: Mihai Sain >> >> ddrck and qspick should have mck_div as parent clocks to be in sync with >> linux driver. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mihai Sain > > Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea > > Applied to

Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] nand: atmel: Add DM based NAND driver

On 8/29/22 9:19 AM, Balamanikandan Gunasundar wrote: > This implementation is ported from the rework done by Boris Brezillon > in Linux. This porting is done based on linux-5.4-at91. The driver is > tested in sam9x60ek, sama5d3_xplained, sam9x75eb and sama7g54-ddr3-eb. > > Changes done includes >

Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] ARM: dts: at91: sam9x60ek: Enable NAND support

On 8/31/22 5:19 PM, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > Hi > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 3:31 PM wrote: >> >> On 8/31/22 4:14 PM, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 8:20 AM Balamanikandan Gunasundar >>> wrote: Enable the EBI and NAND flash

Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] ARM: dts: at91: sam9x60ek: Enable NAND support

On 8/31/22 4:14 PM, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 8:20 AM Balamanikandan Gunasundar > wrote: >> >> Enable the EBI and NAND flash controller. Define the pinctrl and >> partition table >> >> Signed-off-by: Balamanikandan Gunasundar >> >> --- >>

Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Add DM support for atmel NAND driver

On 8/30/22 5:30 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 at 00:41, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 8:19 AM Balamanikandan Gunasundar >> wrote: >>> >>> Change include: >>> >>> - Adapt GPIO descriptor apis for U-Boot. Use >>>

Re: [PATCH 0/3] sam9x60_curiosity PDA detection support

On 7/7/22 2:10 PM, Durai Manickam KR wrote: > This patch series adds the PDA detection support for sam9x60_curiosity rev4 > boards. In rev4, the raspberry-pi display is replaced by PDA display. > > Durai Manickam KR (3): >configs: sama9x60_curiosity: add onewire and eeprom drivers >board:

Re: [PATCH] mmc: atmel_sdhci: re-enable sdhci after SD Card re-insertion

On 7/8/22 3:40 PM, Eugen Hristev - M18282 wrote: > On 6/22/22 4:30 PM, Sergiu Moga wrote: >> Whenever the SD Card would be removed and then re-inserted while in the >> U-Boot command line, the `SDBPWR` bit of the `SDMMC_PCR` register would >> remain unset afterwards. In order for the bit to be set

[PULL] u-boot-at91-2022.01-b

Hello Tom, Please pull tag u-boot-at91-2022.01-b , the second set of at91 features for the next cycle 2022.01 . This small feature set adds the support for PWM driver for the sama5d2 SoC. It also adds a node in the DT for this SoC. Thanks, Eugen The following changes since commit

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add SAMA5D2 PWM Support

On 9/21/21 2:28 AM, Dan Sneddon wrote: > Add support for the PWM found on SAMA5D2 SoCs. > > Dan Sneddon (3): >pwm: Add PWM driver for SAMA5D2 >dt-bindings: pwm: pwm-at91: Add PWM bindings for A5D2 >ARM:dts: sama5d2: Add pwm definition > > arch/arm/dts/sama5d2.dtsi |

[PULL next] u-boot-at91-2022.01-a

Hello Tom, Please pull tag u-boot-at91-2022.01-a , the first set of features for the next cycle 2022.01 . The PR is rebased on -next . This feature set includes : the support for CPU driver for arm926 (sam9x60 device); changes required for OP-TEE boot for sama5d2_xplained and sama5d27_som1_ek

Re: Rename of the u-boot-atmel custodian tree

On 8/26/21 10:17 AM, Eugen Hristev - M18282 wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I plan to rename the u-boot-atmel tree to u-boot-at91 . > > It's been more than 5 years since Atmel is part of Microchip, and the > name is slowly being changed to reflect the new reality. > > It makes more sense to have

Re: [PATCH 1/2] include: dt-bindings: mfd: add atmel flexcom include file

On 8/27/21 1:44 PM, Eugen Hristev wrote: > Add dt-bindings include file for Atmel Flexcom hardware block. > This file is copied from Linux kernel. > It is used in devicetrees from Linux. > > Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev > --- Applied series to u-boot-atmel/next

Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: remove references to RM9200DK

On 8/25/21 1:27 PM, Eugen Hristev wrote: > The AT91 RM9200DK board was removed long time ago. > Remove existing references that were not cleaned up. > > Fixes: 1c85752258 ("ARM: remove broken "at91rm9200dk" board") > Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev > --- Applied to u-boot-atmel/next

Re: [PATCH] net: remove unused CONFIG_DRIVER_AT91EMAC_*

On 8/28/21 4:37 PM, Ramon Fried wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 1:28 PM Eugen Hristev > wrote: >> >> AT91EMAC driver is unused, thus removing. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev >> --- >> 2.25.1 >> > Reviewd-by: Ramon Fried > Applied to u-boot-atmel/next

Re: [PATCH] board: pm926x: remove unused CONFIG_SYS_AT91_CPU_NAME

On 8/24/21 4:02 PM, Eugen Hristev wrote: > CONFIG_SYS_AT91_CPU_NAME looks to be unused. > Remove it and remove it from config_whitelist.txt > > Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev > --- Applied to u-boot-atmel/next

Re: [PATCH] board: atmel: sama7g5ek: avoid rewriting of configured CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND

On 8/19/21 2:09 PM, Eugen Hristev wrote: > Rewrite the CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND only if it's not previously configured from > defconfig file. > This allows the user to select from defconfig/menuconfig the desired > boot command. > Adjust the current board defconfigs to reflect the default booting

Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2_icp: add QSPI1 device

On 8/17/21 1:29 PM, Eugen Hristev wrote: > From: Mihai Sain > > Add support for sst26vf064b 64Mbit qspi-flash that is > present on sama5d2_icp board. > > Signed-off-by: Mihai Sain > [eugen.hris...@microchip.com: move u-boot properties to > sama5d2_icp-u-boot.dtsi] > Signed-off-by: Eugen

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Use device tree to get DRAM for sama5d27_som1_ek/sama5d2_xplained

On 8/16/21 3:25 PM, Clément Léger wrote: > Loading U-Boot after OP-TEE requires to move the base address of the > DRAM and reduce its size. Indeed, OP-TEE will be loaded at start of > DRAM for these platforms and this DRAM will be secured and thus not > accessible to U-Boot. > > Currently,

Rename of the u-boot-atmel custodian tree

Hello everyone, I plan to rename the u-boot-atmel tree to u-boot-at91 . It's been more than 5 years since Atmel is part of Microchip, and the name is slowly being changed to reflect the new reality. It makes more sense to have the custodian tree named u-boot-at91 , as this tree is used only

Re: [PATCH] ARM: mach-at91: fix multiple cpu_reset definition when enabling SYSRESET

On 8/24/21 12:37 PM, Clément Léger wrote: > Le Mon, 23 Aug 2021 07:42:58 +, > a écrit : > >> On 8/4/21 5:55 PM, Clément Léger wrote: >>> When SYSRESET is enabled, cpu_reset function is also defined in >>> sysreset-uclass.c which lead to multiple definitions of this >>> function since reset.c

Re: [PATCH] ARM: mach-at91: fix multiple cpu_reset definition when enabling SYSRESET

On 8/4/21 5:55 PM, Clément Léger wrote: > When SYSRESET is enabled, cpu_reset function is also defined in > sysreset-uclass.c which lead to multiple definitions of this function > since reset.c is build unconditionally. Add a check in Makefile to build > this file only if SYSRESET isn't enabled. >

Re: [PATCH 0/4] clk: at91: fix system clocks display for sam9x60

On 7/16/21 8:43 AM, Claudiu Beznea wrote: > Hi, > > After added CCF support for SAM9X60 the CPU, crystal and master clocks > were not displayed correctly. These clocks are now displayed by at91_cpu > driver. > Adapt master clock driver by adding control logic for its prescaler and > divider such

Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add chip ID of SAMA5D29

On 7/14/21 4:43 PM, Hari Prasath wrote: > Add SAMA5D29 SoC for identification during the boot up. > > Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath > --- Applied to u-boot-atmel/next, thanks !

Re: [PATCH] arm: at91: gardena-smart-gateway-at91sam: Adjust to production values

On 6/17/21 7:57 PM, Reto Schneider wrote: > From: Reto Schneider > > This commit updates the default config with the values that will be used > soon on the Atmel / Microchip AT91SAM9G25 based GARDENA smart gateway. > > Signed-off-by: Reto Schneider > --- > This patch applies to current

Re: [PATCH 3/5] ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2: Add memory node in devicetree

On 8/2/21 3:39 PM, Clément Léger wrote: > sama5d2 support from DRAM will be modified to use device tree instead of > hardcoded addresses. In order to prepare that, add the memory node to > sama5d2.dtsi file since the boards supported by U-Boot with sama5d2 all > contains 512Mb of DDR. > >

[PULL] u-boot-atmel-fixes-2021.10-a

Hello Tom, Please pull tag u-boot-atmel-fixes-2021.10-a , the first set of atmel fixes for the 2021.10 cycle. This small fixes set is dedicated to fixing the onewire subsystem for the at91 boards which was broken since 2020.04. Thanks, Eugen The following changes since commit

Re: [PATCH 1/2] w1: w1-gpio: claim the gpio with correct initial flag

On 6/23/21 5:20 PM, Eugen Hristev wrote: > gpio_request_by_name should be called with proper flags. > The 0 value flag is invalid, and causes bad initialization of the gpio. > > Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev > --- > drivers/w1/w1-gpio.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >

[PULL next] u-boot-atmel-2021.10-a

Hello Tom, Please pull tag u-boot-atmel-2021.10-a , the first set of atmel features for the next cycle 2021.10 . This feature set converts the boards pm9261 and pm9263 Ethernet support to DM; enables hash command for all SAM boards; fixes the NAND pmecc bit-flips correction; adds Falcon boot

Re: [PATCH] board: sama5d3_xplained: add Falcon boot support

On 6/1/21 12:23 AM, Michael Opdenacker wrote: > This supports Falcon boot support for Microchip SAMA5D3 Xplained, > tested on raw MMC, and on raw NAND. > > spl_start_uboot() is has the simplest possible implementation. > It doesn't test the environment because enabling environment support >

Re: [PATCH] configs: sam boards: add hash command

On 5/26/21 4:19 PM, Eugen Hristev wrote: > Add hash and hash verify commands. These would be useful for > verifying copied data. > > Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev > --- > configs/sam9x60ek_mmc_defconfig| 2 ++ > configs/sam9x60ek_nandflash_defconfig | 2 ++ >

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Revert "sama5d3: Fix Galois Field Table offsets"

On 5/21/21 11:52 AM, Tudor Ambarus wrote: > This reverts commit 786f888b743e9b83c9095cb9b5548ebe2e29afc5. > > Looks like the datasheet at > https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/SAMA5D3-Series-Data-sheet-DS60001609b.pdf > is wrong, and the testing was poorly done, because the PMECC did

Re: [PATCH] configs: sama5d27_wlsom1_ek_mmc: add default bootargs

On 5/18/21 12:02 PM, Eugen Hristev wrote: > Add default bootarguments with booting from mmc0 for this configuration. > This will allow a default Linux boot for this board. > > Suggested-by: Jarvis Chen > Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev > --- > configs/sama5d27_wlsom1_ek_mmc_defconfig | 1 + > 1

Re: [PATCH] configs: sama7g5ek: increase bootm len

On 4/29/21 3:00 PM, Eugen Hristev wrote: > Increase the BOOTM_LEN to 32M . This would allow a bigger kernel image to be > booted, for example the multi_v7_defconfig. > > Loading Kernel Image > Image too large: increase CONFIG_SYS_BOOTM_LEN > Must RESET board to recover > resetting ... > >

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] board:pm9263 - Fix some typos in comments

On 4/23/21 4:41 PM, Ilko Iliev wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ilko Iliev > --- > board/ronetix/pm9263/pm9263.c | 10 +- > include/configs/pm9263.h | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > Applied with minor commit message change to u-boot-atmel/next, thanks !

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] board:pm9263 - Switch to use DM_ETH

On 4/23/21 4:41 PM, Ilko Iliev wrote: > - Enable CONFIG_DM_ETH in configs/pm9263_defconfig > - Drop legacy initialization in board/ronetix/pm9263.c > - Remove network related setting from include/configs/pm9263.h > > Signed-off-by: Ilko Iliev > --- > Changes to v2: > - improve commit message

Re: [PATCH v3] board:pm9261 - Remove network support

On 4/23/21 4:06 PM, Ilko Iliev wrote: > The network support is removed because there is > no DM for Davicom DM9000. > > Signed-off-by: Ilko Iliev > --- > board/ronetix/pm9261/pm9261.c | 54 --- > configs/pm9261_defconfig | 4 +-- >

Re: [PATCH v2] arm: at91: gardena-smart-gateway-at91sam: Adjust to production values

On 4/15/21 9:59 AM, Reto Schneider wrote: > From: Reto Schneider > > This commit updates the default config with the values that are actually > used "in the wild" and which are close to what is used on the MediaTek > MT7688 based, 2nd generation of the GARDENA smart gateway: > - Reduce startup

Re: [PATCH v2] board:pm9261 - Enable DM_ETH

On 4/23/21 12:19 PM, Ilko Iliev wrote: > On 21.04.21 08:50, eugen.hris...@microchip.com wrote: >> On 4/19/21 4:37 PM, Ilko Iliev wrote: >>> This patch remove the network support for PM9261 because >>> currently there is no DM suport for Davicom D9000. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Ilko Iliev >>> --- >>

Re: [PATCH] board:pm9263 - Enable DM_ETH

On 4/19/21 4:37 PM, Ilko Iliev wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ilko Iliev > --- Hi, Could you please add a commit message explaining what you are changing and why ? Also take into consideration the comments from your other patch about pm9261 which also apply here. Eugen >

Re: [PATCH v2] board:pm9261 - Enable DM_ETH

On 4/19/21 4:37 PM, Ilko Iliev wrote: > This patch remove the network support for PM9261 because > currently there is no DM suport for Davicom D9000. > > Signed-off-by: Ilko Iliev > --- Hi, If I look at the commit message, I would expect something is enabled, but in fact something is removed.

[PULL] u-boot-atmel-2021.07-b

Hello Tom, Please pull tag u-boot-atmel-2021.07-b , the second set of atmel features for the 2021.07 cycle. This small feature set include support for 5th PIO bank on pio4 pinctrl driver and a fix for the SPL on sama5d3. Thanks, Eugen The following changes since commit

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: atmel_pio4: add support for sama7g5 pio4 version with 5 banks

On 4/7/21 11:39 AM, Eugen Hristev wrote: > Add support for sama7g5 pinctrl variant, with 5 banks with a degraded > 8 line only 5th bank. > Based on Linux Kernel implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev > --- > drivers/gpio/atmel_pio4.c | 22 ++ > 1 file changed, 22

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: at91: sama5d3: add u-boot properties to sama5d3 pit timer

On 4/7/21 12:39 PM, Manuel Luís Reis wrote: > Great, thanks for your help. > > Cheers > Manuel > > M. Luís Reis MSc MIET Chartered Engineer > > > > On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 at 10:31, wrote: >> >> On 4/7/21 12:16 PM, Manuel Luís Reis wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> @Derald: Thanks for trying this out. >>>

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: at91: sama5d3: add u-boot properties to sama5d3 pit timer

On 4/7/21 12:16 PM, Manuel Luís Reis wrote: > Hi, > > @Derald: Thanks for trying this out. > > @Eugen: For what is worth, I can also confirm that I also tried with > the latest version v2021.04 and the board boots OK out of the box with > this patch only. > Ok, great news ! Thanks. Until this

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: at91: sama5d3: add u-boot properties to sama5d3 pit timer

On 4/7/21 1:16 AM, Derald Woods wrote: > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 4:40 AM Manuel Reis > wrote: > > in the early SPL boot stage whenever there is a call to udelay, > dm_timer_init fails to find the pit timer whenever it traverses > the device tree, if this

Re: [PATCH] add u-boot properties to sama5d3 pit timer

Hi Manuel, Subject should be like this : ARM: dts: at91: sama5d3: ... On 4/5/21 8:46 PM, Manuel Reis wrote: > pit timer node requires u-boot properties to be recognized could you be more specific, where it's required, like we discussed, in the early boot process of the SPL , it's not found if

Re: SAMA5D3 Xplained: SPL broken after panic added to /lib/time.c:94

On 4/5/21 6:42 PM, Manuel Luís Reis wrote: > Hi Eugen, > > > Does the node have the property > > > > u-boot,dm-pre-reloc; > > > > Maybe try to add this and see if it changes anything ? > > Thanks. Indeed it didn't have those properties. I have added them and > also had to remove the

Re: SAMA5D3 Xplained: SPL broken after panic added to /lib/time.c:94

On 4/5/21 3:47 PM, Manuel Luís Reis wrote: > Hi Eugen, > >> As Sean Anderson pointed out : the call to timer must have not worked at >> all before this change that now breaks things. >> Have you tried removing the call to the timer from this mem_init, to see >> if this makes the board boot

Re: SAMA5D3 Xplained: SPL broken after panic added to /lib/time.c:94

On 4/4/21 7:25 PM, Manuel Reis wrote: > Hi again, > > I guess I misunderstood things a bit. Apologies for that. > Nevertheless, timer_init in board_init_f is pointing to the weak > timer_init in /lib/time.c, which is empty. > > Is there a way we can force start the pit timer? > Any pointer would

[PULL next] u-boot-atmel-2021.07-a

Hello Tom, Please pull tag u-boot-atmel-2021.07-a , the first set of features for the next cycle 2021.07 . This small feature set includes the implementation of the slew rate for the PIO4 pin controller device, and a fix for arm926ejs-based microprocessors that avoids a crash. Thanks, Eugen

Re: SAMA5D3 Xplained: SPL broken after panic added to /lib/time.c:94

On 3/23/21 6:08 PM, Manuel Luís Reis wrote: > Hi again, > > FYI: As a small test I commented out the change you mentioned but got > the same mistake. Begs to wonder if it is >  related to the issue at hand. > > Going back to >

Re: SAMA5D3 Xplained: SPL broken after panic added to /lib/time.c:94

On 3/23/21 1:28 PM, Manuel Luís Reis wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your reply. > > > Can you please check if this commit is in your tree, or, if the same has > > to be applied in your case (sama5d3), to make it work ? > > I've got that change in my tree, but I'm still getting the error

Re: SAMA5D3 Xplained: SPL broken after panic added to /lib/time.c:94

Hi, Can you please check if this commit is in your tree, or, if the same has to be applied in your case (sama5d3), to make it work ? Here is the commit : https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-atmel/-/commit/786f35b619ddbfb88e4532d11a56413f5dab473f On 3/23/21 1:06 PM, Manuel Luís

Re: [PATCH] Fix data abort in startup for at91 machines based on ARM926EJS

Hello Martin, Okay, I get it. Thanks for testing this. I applied your patch as it was original, and I updated a bit the commit short message to match requirements. also, Reviewed-by: Eugen Hristev Applied to u-boot-atmel/next On 3/20/21 1:07 PM, Martin Townsend wrote: > Hi Eugen, > > It

Re: [PATCH] Fix data abort in startup for at91 machines based on ARM926EJS

Yes, please, try like this, continue to use r4 as it was done initially, but save r4 to stack and restore before returning. Let's see if this solution works for you. I will wait for your v2 of the patch. Thanks ! Eugen On 3/18/21 10:31 PM, Martin Townsend wrote: > Hi Eugen, > > Pop and push

Re: [PATCH] Fix data abort in startup for at91 machines based on ARM926EJS

Hello Martin, I reviewed things a bit, and, as it looks to me, and according to AAPCS, we can still use r4, as this is scratch space, but we need to save it and restore it before and after the code of lowlevel_init. Because r6 is also scratch, with your patch , we lose the data in r6, in case

Re: [PATCH] Fix data abort in startup for at91 machines based on ARM926EJS

Hi, On 26.02.2021 10:44, Martin Townsend wrote: > The startup code in arm/cpu/arm926ejs preserves the link register across > the call to lowlevel_init by using r4: > > mov r4, lr /* perserve link reg across call */ > bl lowlevel_init /* go setup pll,mux,memory */ > mov

Re: [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: add support for slew-rate

On 27.01.2021 15:00, Claudiu Beznea wrote: > Hi, > > This series adds support for slew rate on AT91 PIO4 driver. > The support is enabled on SAMA7G5. > > Thank you, > Claudiu Beznea > > Claudiu Beznea (2): >dt-bindings: pinctrl: at91-pio4: add slew-rate >pinctrl: at91-pio4: add support

Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: add support for slew-rate

On 27.01.2021 15:00, Claudiu Beznea wrote: > SAMA7G5 supports slew rate configuration. Adapt the driver for this. > For switching frequencies lower than 50MHz the slew rate needs to > be enabled. Since most of the pins on SAMA7G5 fall into this category > enabled the slew rate by default. > >

[PULL] u-boot-atmel-fixes-2021.04-a

Hello Tom, Please pull tag u-boot-atmel-fixes-2021.04-a , the first set of fixes for atmel for 2021.04 cycle. This small PR includes just two fixes but very important: one revert in the clk subsystem which fixes the boot on many old boards (sama5d2_xplained, sama5d4_xplained), which currently

Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: compat: partially revert "dm: Remove uses of device_bind_offset()"

On 03.02.2021 14:59, Simon Glass wrote: > On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 01:48, Eugen Hristev > wrote: >> >> Revert changes in at91 compat.c that cause u-boot to fail booting on >> sama5d4_xplained and sama5d2_xplained >> >> Log below: >> >> >> No serial driver found >> Could not initialize timer (err

Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: at91: sama7g5ek: enable pull-up for serial debug line

On 28.01.2021 10:14, Eugen Hristev wrote: > If the serial tx/rx are floating, it can happen that bogus characters > are detected on the line at boot time. This leads to U-boot accidentally > thinking someone pressed a key to stop autoboot, thus stopping booting > process. > This can happen if the

Re: [PATCH 04/11] dm: Remove uses of device_bind_offset()

On 01.02.2021 14:02, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Eugen, > > On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 at 01:13, wrote: >> >> On 31.01.2021 17:37, Simon Glass wrote: >>> Hi Eugen, >>> >>> On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 at 02:18, wrote: On 10.12.2020 02:26, Simon Glass wrote: > This function is not needed since the

Re: [PATCH 04/11] dm: Remove uses of device_bind_offset()

On 31.01.2021 17:37, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Eugen, > > On Sun, 31 Jan 2021 at 02:18, wrote: >> >> On 10.12.2020 02:26, Simon Glass wrote: >>> This function is not needed since the standard device_bind() can be used >>> instead. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass >>> --- >>> >>>

Re: [PATCH 04/11] dm: Remove uses of device_bind_offset()

On 10.12.2020 02:26, Simon Glass wrote: > This function is not needed since the standard device_bind() can be used > instead. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > > arch/x86/cpu/apollolake/spl.c | 2 +- > drivers/clk/at91/compat.c | 20

Re: [PATCH 0/4] at91: Fix NAND PMECC on various SoCs/boards

On 08.01.2021 14:40, Tudor Ambarus wrote: > Fix the Galois Field Table offsets for sama5d3 and sam9x60 SoCs. > PMECC could not correct errors. > > Fix the involuntarily disablement of NAND PMECC on some boards, > and fix some wrong definitions for CONFIG_PMECC_CAP. > > Tested on sam9x60ek and

Re: [PATCH 1/3] board: Atmel: Add SAMA5D27 giant board

On 21.01.2021 18:55, Greg Gallagher wrote: > Giant board is a tiny SBC based on the Adafruit Feather form factor, > created by groboards it contains a SAMA5D2 processor (SAMA5D27), > 128 MB of RAM and a microSD card for storage. > > Signed-off-by: Greg Gallagher > --- > >

Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] add support for sama7g5 ethernet interfaces

On 19.01.2021 13:26, Claudiu Beznea wrote: > Hi, > > This series add support for SAMA7G5 ethernet interfaces: one > gigabit interface and one 10/100Mbps interface. > > Thank you, > Claudiu Beznea > > Changes in v3: > - get rid of patch 1/6 from v2 as it was already integrated from patch series

[PULL] u-boot-atmel-2021.04-b

Hi Tom, Please pull tag u-boot-atmel-2021.04-b , the second set of new atmel features for 2021.04 cycle. This feature set includes macb updates for all interfaces and new sama7g5 variant support; micrel ksz9031 DLL support; a new board from Giant based on Adafruit feather form factor which

Re: [PATCH 1/2] board: Atmel: Add SAMA5D27 giant board

On 21.01.2021 00:38, Greg Gallagher wrote: > Giant board is a tiny SBC based on the Adafruit Feather form factor, > created by groboards it contains a SAMA5D2 processor (SAMA5D27), > 128 MB of RAM and a microSD card for storage. > > Signed-off-by: Greg Gallagher > --- Hi Greg, This patch [1/2]

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] add support for sama7g5 ethernet interfaces

On 03.12.2020 15:59, Claudiu Beznea wrote: > Hi, > > This series add support for SAMA7G5 ethernet interfaces: one > gigabit interface and one 10/100Mbps interface. > > Thank you, > Claudiu Beznea > > Changes in v2: > - fix compilation error on patch 6/6 for wb50n_defconfig > > Claudiu Beznea

Re: [PATCH 1/6] net: macb: use dummy descriptor for RBQP

On 15.01.2021 14:26, Padmarao Begari wrote: > Hi Eugen, > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 1:34 PM > wrote: > > On 15.01.2021 06:02, Padmarao Begari wrote: > > Hi Eugen, > > > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 4:50 PM

Re: [PATCH 1/6] net: macb: use dummy descriptor for RBQP

On 15.01.2021 06:02, Padmarao Begari wrote: > Hi Eugen, > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 4:50 PM > wrote: > > On 17.12.2020 07:22, Padmarao Begari - I30397 wrote: > > Hi Eugen, > > > > This series of patches break my side of work(patches) so you

Re: [PATCH 2/2] board: atmel: Add SAMA5D27 giant board

On 11.01.2021 09:10, Greg Gallagher wrote: > Giant board is a tiny SBC based on the Adafruit Feather form factor, > created by groboards it contains a SAMA5D2 processor (SAMA5D27), > 128 MB of RAM and a microSD card for storage. > > Signed-off-by: Greg Gallagher Hi Greg, > --- > >

  1   2   3   4   >