Re: [PATCH] gpio-uclass: fix off-by-one in gpio_request_list_by_name_nodev()

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 12:10:13PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > By the time we jump to the err label, count represents the number of > gpios we've succesfully requested. So by subtracting one, we fail to > free the most recently requested. > > Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes > Reviewed-by: S

Re: [PATCH] gpio-uclass: fix off-by-one in gpio_request_list_by_name_nodev()

On 20/04/2023 00.40, Simon Glass wrote: > On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 at 22:11, Rasmus Villemoes > wrote: >> >> By the time we jump to the err label, count represents the number of >> gpios we've succesfully requested. So by subtracting one, we fail to >> free the most recently requested. >> >> Signed-off

Re: [PATCH] gpio-uclass: fix off-by-one in gpio_request_list_by_name_nodev()

On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 at 22:11, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > By the time we jump to the err label, count represents the number of > gpios we've succesfully requested. So by subtracting one, we fail to > free the most recently requested. > > Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-

[PATCH] gpio-uclass: fix off-by-one in gpio_request_list_by_name_nodev()

By the time we jump to the err label, count represents the number of gpios we've succesfully requested. So by subtracting one, we fail to free the most recently requested. Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes --- drivers/gpio/gpio-uclass.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -