Hi Scott,
On 10/09/2013 22:11, Scott Wood wrote:
Sure.
Acked-by: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
I'm curious who's been doing these patchwork assignments and what
they're basing it on.
I think that everyone of us custodians has write rights to assign
patches. Personally, I check the
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 09:24 +0200, Stefano Babic wrote:
Hi Scott,
On 10/09/2013 22:11, Scott Wood wrote:
Sure.
Acked-by: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
I'm curious who's been doing these patchwork assignments and what
they're basing it on.
I think that everyone of us
On 24/08/2013 16:51, Elie De Brauwer wrote:
On a board with an i.mx28 and a Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAH4, Linux says:
NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xdc (Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAH4),
512MiB, page size: 4096, OOB size: 224) the ECC strength is 16.
On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 19:02 +0200, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 24/08/2013 16:51, Elie De Brauwer wrote:
On a board with an i.mx28 and a Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAH4, Linux says:
NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xdc (Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAH4),
512MiB, page size: 4096, OOB size: 224)
On a board with an i.mx28 and a Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAH4, Linux says:
NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xdc (Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAH4),
512MiB, page size: 4096, OOB size: 224) the ECC strength is 16.
root@(none):/sys/devices/virtual/mtd/mtd0# for i in ecc_strength oobsize
subpagesize;
5 matches
Mail list logo