Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mxs_nand: Fix ECC strength for NAND flash with OOB size of 224

2013-09-11 Thread Stefano Babic
Hi Scott, On 10/09/2013 22:11, Scott Wood wrote: Sure. Acked-by: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com I'm curious who's been doing these patchwork assignments and what they're basing it on. I think that everyone of us custodians has write rights to assign patches. Personally, I check the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mxs_nand: Fix ECC strength for NAND flash with OOB size of 224

2013-09-11 Thread Scott Wood
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 09:24 +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: Hi Scott, On 10/09/2013 22:11, Scott Wood wrote: Sure. Acked-by: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com I'm curious who's been doing these patchwork assignments and what they're basing it on. I think that everyone of us

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mxs_nand: Fix ECC strength for NAND flash with OOB size of 224

2013-09-10 Thread Stefano Babic
On 24/08/2013 16:51, Elie De Brauwer wrote: On a board with an i.mx28 and a Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAH4, Linux says: NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xdc (Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAH4), 512MiB, page size: 4096, OOB size: 224) the ECC strength is 16.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mxs_nand: Fix ECC strength for NAND flash with OOB size of 224

2013-09-10 Thread Scott Wood
On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 19:02 +0200, Stefano Babic wrote: On 24/08/2013 16:51, Elie De Brauwer wrote: On a board with an i.mx28 and a Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAH4, Linux says: NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xdc (Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAH4), 512MiB, page size: 4096, OOB size: 224)

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mxs_nand: Fix ECC strength for NAND flash with OOB size of 224

2013-08-24 Thread Elie De Brauwer
On a board with an i.mx28 and a Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAH4, Linux says: NAND device: Manufacturer ID: 0x2c, Chip ID: 0xdc (Micron MT29F4G08ABAEAH4), 512MiB, page size: 4096, OOB size: 224) the ECC strength is 16. root@(none):/sys/devices/virtual/mtd/mtd0# for i in ecc_strength oobsize subpagesize;