On Dec 3, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Becky Bruce wrote:
>
> On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:26 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Becky Bruce
>> wrote:
>>> This is for boards that use the SDRAM mode on the LBC but don't
>>> require any additional setup.
>>>
>>> I'm merging all the initdr
On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 14:54 -0600, Becky Bruce wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:26 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
>
> > Hi Becky,
> >
> >> +/* Common ddr init for non-corenet fsl 85xx platforms */
> >> +#ifndef CONFIG_FSL_CORENET
> >> +phys_size_t initdram(int board_type)
> >> +{
> >> + phys_size_t dram_si
On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:26 PM, Peter Tyser wrote:
> Hi Becky,
>
>> +/* Common ddr init for non-corenet fsl 85xx platforms */
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_FSL_CORENET
>> +phys_size_t initdram(int board_type)
>> +{
>> +phys_size_t dram_size = 0;
>> +
>> +puts("Initializing\n");
>
> Any chance we can r
On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:26 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Becky Bruce
> wrote:
>> This is for boards that use the SDRAM mode on the LBC but don't
>> require any additional setup.
>>
>> I'm merging all the initdram() calls into a single function for 85xx,
>> and have to be
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Becky Bruce wrote:
> This is for boards that use the SDRAM mode on the LBC but don't
> require any additional setup.
>
> I'm merging all the initdram() calls into a single function for 85xx,
> and have to be able to distinguish between boards that require an
> sdram
This is for boards that use the SDRAM mode on the LBC but don't
require any additional setup.
I'm merging all the initdram() calls into a single function for 85xx,
and have to be able to distinguish between boards that require an
sdram_init() function, and those that do not. We could have defined
6 matches
Mail list logo
