On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 6:09 PM Marek Vasut wrote:
>
> On 10/10/19 12:00 PM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:39:13 +0200
> > Marek Vasut wrote:
> > ...
> >>> The preferred way for I/O access is documented in [1], see "Use structures
> >>> for I/O access" section.
> >>
> >>
On 10/10/19 12:00 PM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:39:13 +0200
> Marek Vasut wrote:
> ...
>>> The preferred way for I/O access is documented in [1], see "Use structures
>>> for I/O access" section.
>>
>> This seems to not scale and I keep running into the problem where a
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:39:13 +0200
Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
...
> > The preferred way for I/O access is documented in [1], see "Use structures
> > for I/O access" section.
>
> This seems to not scale and I keep running into the problem where a few
> registers changed between various
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 11:29 AM Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:43:46 +0200
> Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschm...@gmail.com wrote:
> ...
> > > Why is this required? In the past we have rejected all new code adding
> > > defines instead of structs for register accesses.
On 10/10/19 11:29 AM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:43:46 +0200
> Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschm...@gmail.com wrote:
> ...
>>> Why is this required? In the past we have rejected all new code adding
>>> defines instead of structs for register accesses. Have we changed our
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 10:43:46 +0200
Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschm...@gmail.com wrote:
...
> > Why is this required? In the past we have rejected all new code adding
> > defines instead of structs for register accesses. Have we changed our mind
> > now?
>
> Who is we?
U-Boot
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:09 AM Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 09:16:14 +0200
> Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschm...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 8:20 AM Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> > >
> > > Convert system manager for Gen5, Arria 10 and Stratix 10 from struct
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 09:16:14 +0200
Simon Goldschmidt simon.k.r.goldschm...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 8:20 AM Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> >
> > Convert system manager for Gen5, Arria 10 and Stratix 10 from struct
> > to defines.
>
> Same as 2/4: please add a description about the
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 8:20 AM Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>
> Convert system manager for Gen5, Arria 10 and Stratix 10 from struct
> to defines.
Same as 2/4: please add a description about the "read address from dts" thing.
Regards,
Simon
>
> Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan
>
> ---
> v3:
> - Remove "No
Convert system manager for Gen5, Arria 10 and Stratix 10 from struct
to defines.
Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan
---
v3:
- Remove "No functional change" in commit description.
v2:
- Revert to use writel(), readl() and etc.
- Get base address from DT.
- Add prefix to defines.
---
10 matches
Mail list logo