Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/2] ARM: v7: Enable basic framework for supporting bits for CVE-2017-5715

2018-06-13 Thread Nishanth Menon
On 10:08-20180613, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 04:58:34PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > On 21:40-20180612, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > [...] > > > > I started respinning the series, while there is definitely a use of > > > > implementing in u-boot, > > > >

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/2] ARM: v7: Enable basic framework for supporting bits for CVE-2017-5715

2018-06-13 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 04:58:34PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 21:40-20180612, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > [...] > > > I started respinning the series, while there is definitely a use of > > > implementing in u-boot, > > > I am starting to wonder if we should also be doing this in

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/2] ARM: v7: Enable basic framework for supporting bits for CVE-2017-5715

2018-06-12 Thread Nishanth Menon
On 21:40-20180612, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: [...] > > I started respinning the series, while there is definitely a use of > > implementing in u-boot, > > I am starting to wonder if we should also be doing this in kernel. > > How does the kernel set the bit when the kernel is running in

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/2] ARM: v7: Enable basic framework for supporting bits for CVE-2017-5715

2018-06-12 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 02:13:38PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > >> Hi Folks, > >> > >> This is a follow through on the discussion we have had in [1]. > >> This itself is'nt a

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/2] ARM: v7: Enable basic framework for supporting bits for CVE-2017-5715

2018-06-12 Thread Nishanth Menon
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:05 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> Hi Folks, >> >> This is a follow through on the discussion we have had in [1]. >> This itself is'nt a complete solution and is based on recommendation >> This from Arm[2] for variant

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/2] ARM: v7: Enable basic framework for supporting bits for CVE-2017-5715

2018-05-22 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Hi Folks, > > This is a follow through on the discussion we have had in [1]. > This itself is'nt a complete solution and is based on recommendation > This from Arm[2] for variant 2 CVE-2017-5715 > > The Linux kernel discussions

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/2] ARM: v7: Enable basic framework for supporting bits for CVE-2017-5715

2018-01-25 Thread Nishanth Menon
Hi Folks, This is a follow through on the discussion we have had in [1]. This itself is'nt a complete solution and is based on recommendation This from Arm[2] for variant 2 CVE-2017-5715 The Linux kernel discussions are spread out in [3], ATF and OPTEE status are available in [4]. This is just