Re: [U-Boot] SPL broken for pandaboard with v2011.09?

2011-10-13 Thread Aneesh V
Hi Steve, John, Sorry for the late reply. On Thursday 13 October 2011 05:12 AM, Steve Sakoman wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:23 PM, John Rigbyjohn.ri...@linaro.org wrote: My tree has a bunch of extra patches on top and is based on rc2. I know it works:

Re: [U-Boot] SPL broken for pandaboard with v2011.09?

2011-10-13 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Aneesh V ane...@ti.com wrote: Perhaps it is a board rev issue. Yes it is. SPL works on everything other than a Panda with OMAP4430 ES2.0. I could reproduce it on an ES2.0 Panda. Please note that an SDP with OMAP4430 ES2.0 works too, which is rather strange. At

Re: [U-Boot] SPL broken for pandaboard with v2011.09?

2011-10-12 Thread John Rigby
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Steve Sakoman sako...@gmail.com wrote: I'm considering using SPL instead of x-load for an upcoming omap project. To begin learning about SPL I tried building and running SPL for pandaboard using v2011.09. With my initial build I got the following output:  

Re: [U-Boot] SPL broken for pandaboard with v2011.09?

2011-10-12 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:00 PM, John Rigby john.ri...@linaro.org wrote: Has anyone else been able to successfully use SPL on pandaboard with v2011.09? You may want to see if the spl is oversize.  Sometime ago the size was pushed up to 38K but the base was not moved to  accommodate the

Re: [U-Boot] SPL broken for pandaboard with v2011.09?

2011-10-12 Thread John Rigby
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Steve Sakoman sako...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:00 PM, John Rigby john.ri...@linaro.org wrote: Has anyone else been able to successfully use SPL on pandaboard with v2011.09? You may want to see if the spl is oversize.  Sometime ago the size

Re: [U-Boot] SPL broken for pandaboard with v2011.09?

2011-10-12 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:23 PM, John Rigby john.ri...@linaro.org wrote: My tree has the precalculated ddr timing patch: U-Boot/SPL: omap4: Make ddr pre-calculated timings as default. All ddr configurations(geometry/timings) are done automatically by detecting the device connected at run

Re: [U-Boot] SPL broken for pandaboard with v2011.09?

2011-10-12 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:23 PM, John Rigby john.ri...@linaro.org wrote: My tree has a bunch of extra patches on top and is based on rc2. I know it works: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=boot/u-boot-linaro-stable.git;a=summary Very strange - it doesn't work for me :-( I build from the above

[U-Boot] SPL broken for pandaboard with v2011.09?

2011-10-11 Thread Steve Sakoman
I'm considering using SPL instead of x-load for an upcoming omap project. To begin learning about SPL I tried building and running SPL for pandaboard using v2011.09. With my initial build I got the following output: U-Boot SPL 2011.09 (Oct 11 2011 - 10:18:27) Texas Instruments OMAP4430 ES2.0