Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/25] tpm: tpm_tis_i2c: Drop unnecessary methods

Hi Simon, On 13/08/2015 03:30, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Christophe, On 11 August 2015 at 15:47, christophe.ricard christophe.ric...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, As per my comment on patch 6, i would disagree as well on this one. It tpm_vendor_specific structure is convenient for ST33ZP24 for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/25] tpm: tpm_tis_i2c: Drop unnecessary methods

Hi Christophe, On 13 August 2015 at 14:28, Christophe Ricard christophe.ric...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, On 13/08/2015 03:30, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Christophe, On 11 August 2015 at 15:47, christophe.ricard christophe.ric...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, As per my comment on patch 6, i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/25] tpm: tpm_tis_i2c: Drop unnecessary methods

Hi Christophe, On 11 August 2015 at 15:47, christophe.ricard christophe.ric...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, As per my comment on patch 6, i would disagree as well on this one. It tpm_vendor_specific structure is convenient for ST33ZP24 for example. Best Regards Christophe As things stand

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/25] tpm: tpm_tis_i2c: Drop unnecessary methods

Hi Simon, As per my comment on patch 6, i would disagree as well on this one. It tpm_vendor_specific structure is convenient for ST33ZP24 for example. Best Regards Christophe On 11/08/2015 16:47, Simon Glass wrote: The function methods in struct tpm_vendor_specific just call local functions.