Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/8] sandbox: fdt: Add support for CONFIG_OF_CONTROL

2012-02-14 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Mike, On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Monday 23 January 2012 00:27:56 Simon Glass wrote: On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 10 January 2012 19:45:45 Simon Glass wrote: This adds support for a controlling

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/8] sandbox: fdt: Add support for CONFIG_OF_CONTROL

2012-01-22 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Mike, On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tuesday 10 January 2012 19:45:45 Simon Glass wrote: This adds support for a controlling fdt, mirroring the ARM implementation. OK, but what's the point if we aren't doing FDT's ? Aren't we? I hope that

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/8] sandbox: fdt: Add support for CONFIG_OF_CONTROL

2012-01-22 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 23 January 2012 00:27:56 Simon Glass wrote: On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 10 January 2012 19:45:45 Simon Glass wrote: This adds support for a controlling fdt, mirroring the ARM implementation. OK, but what's the point if we aren't doing

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/8] sandbox: fdt: Add support for CONFIG_OF_CONTROL

2012-01-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 10 January 2012 19:45:45 Simon Glass wrote: This adds support for a controlling fdt, mirroring the ARM implementation. OK, but what's the point if we aren't doing FDT's ? +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_EMBED + /* Get a pointer to the FDT */ + gd-fdt_blob = _binary_dt_dtb_start; +#elif