Hi Paul,
On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 4:42 PM Paul Liu wrote:
>
> Hi Fabio,
>
> I'm on vacation now (Chinese new year). I hope I'll find some time to revive
> my imx8 board.
> I've tried sandbox and qemu. Both of them are not reproducible. I'm wondering
> if it could be some packet loss that causes
Hi Fabio,
I'm on vacation now (Chinese new year). I hope I'll find some time to
revive my imx8 board.
I've tried sandbox and qemu. Both of them are not reproducible. I'm
wondering if it could be some packet loss that causes the issue. Because
sandbox and qemu there won't be any missing packets
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 9:20 AM Fabio Estevam wrote:
> One colleague from you at Linaro was able to reproduce the bug:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/cadq0-x_cj1ecn67u3sefcz-jm4obsymzka+jazrca3ekq84...@mail.gmail.com/
>
> It is not specific to i.MX.
Have you had a chance to look
Hi Paul,
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 4:19 PM Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > I tried to investigate this by U-boot sandbox. But it seems to me that I
> > cannot reproduce this issue.
> > I put a file on localhost apache server and tried to download it from
> > localhost.
> > I might need a more
Hi Michael,
On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 1:36 PM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
wrote:
> I have sent but not sure about it, just compile for now ;)
It didn't work:
u-boot=> wget 192.168.0.16:/test
HTTP/1.0 200 OK| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hi Fabio
On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 5:19 PM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Il dom 7 gen 2024, 17:08 Fabio Estevam ha scritto:
>>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 5:49 AM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > Is this code correct?
>> >
>> > if
Hi
Il dom 7 gen 2024, 17:08 Fabio Estevam ha scritto:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 5:49 AM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Is this code correct?
> >
> > if (tcp_seq_num >= initial_data_seq_num &&
> > store_block(pkt, tcp_seq_num -
Hi Michael,
On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 5:49 AM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Is this code correct?
>
> if (tcp_seq_num >= initial_data_seq_num &&
> store_block(pkt, tcp_seq_num - initial_data_seq_num,
> len) != 0) {
>
Hi
On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 9:49 AM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Is this code correct?
>
> if (tcp_seq_num >= initial_data_seq_num &&
> store_block(pkt, tcp_seq_num - initial_data_seq_num,
> len) != 0) {
>
Hi
Is this code correct?
if (tcp_seq_num >= initial_data_seq_num &&
store_block(pkt, tcp_seq_num - initial_data_seq_num,
len) != 0) {
wget_fail("wget: store error\n",
tcp_seq_num,
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 4:49 PM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
wrote:
> I was thinking that was lwip integration
That's a different issue.
If you want to test lwip integration, you can try it from:
https://github.com/muvarov/u-boot/tree/master_lwip_test_v10
Hi Fabio
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 8:32 PM Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 4:12 PM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
> wrote:
>
> > Can you reproduce with dcache off?
>
> I haven't tried it.
>
> > Where are the patches to test?
>
> The wget issue can be reproduced with
Hi Michael,
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 4:12 PM Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi
wrote:
> Can you reproduce with dcache off?
I haven't tried it.
> Where are the patches to test?
The wget issue can be reproduced with U-Boot master.
No need for extra patches. Please see the first message of this thread
Hi Paul,
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 3:57 PM Paul Liu wrote:
>
> Hi Fabio,
>
> I tried to investigate this by U-boot sandbox. But it seems to me that I
> cannot reproduce this issue.
> I put a file on localhost apache server and tried to download it from
> localhost.
> I might need a more
Hi
On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 7:57 PM Paul Liu wrote:
>
> Hi Fabio,
>
> I tried to investigate this by U-boot sandbox. But it seems to me that I
> cannot reproduce this issue.
> I put a file on localhost apache server and tried to download it from
> localhost.
> I might need a more persistent way to
Hi Fabio,
I tried to investigate this by U-boot sandbox. But it seems to me that I
cannot reproduce this issue.
I put a file on localhost apache server and tried to download it from
localhost.
I might need a more persistent way to reproduce this bug.
Yours,
Paul
On Sat, 6 Jan 2024 at 00:17,
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 6:41 AM Paul Liu wrote:
>
> Hi Fabio,
>
> Yes. I'll look into this problem.
Did you have a chance to investigate this problem?
Thanks
Hi Fabio,
Yes. I'll look into this problem.
Yours,
Paul
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 08:34, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 10:24 PM Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
> > I was not able to see a failure when using "tftp" to transfer the same
> > 420MB file.
> >
> > The number of
Hi Paul,
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 10:24 PM Fabio Estevam wrote:
> I was not able to see a failure when using "tftp" to transfer the same
> 420MB file.
>
> The number of bytes transferred and md5sum always match, so this is a wget
> bug.
There was another user who confirmed the same issue:
Hi Tom,
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 9:17 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> Interesting. What if you take wget out of the equation and use "tftp"
> to grab a large file with a known checksum, repeatedly (note that "rhash
> -C" will give a crc32 in Linux so you can confirm the correct value and
> loop a get,
On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 09:00:23PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> [Adding Tom and Marek]
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 7:22 PM Tim Harvey wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I've recently given wget/tcp a try and find the results inconsistent.
> >
> > Transferring the same file 15 times in a row will
[Adding Tom and Marek]
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 7:22 PM Tim Harvey wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I've recently given wget/tcp a try and find the results inconsistent.
>
> Transferring the same file 15 times in a row will eventually give me
> an incomplete transfer with packet/byte count wrong but
Greetings,
I've recently given wget/tcp a try and find the results inconsistent.
Transferring the same file 15 times in a row will eventually give me
an incomplete transfer with packet/byte count wrong but showing
'Transfer Successful'.
Here is current master on an imx8mp-venice-gw74xx board
23 matches
Mail list logo
