I just clone the git repos. and build at91rm9200ek with eldk4.1,the error
message is same.
I change start.S let it check whether the main osc of at91rm9200 is work, So I
know need relocate the code or not. Use this method I boot u-boot in NOR flash
successful
This adds support for for the PCA9535/PCA9539 family of gpio devices which
have 16 output pins.
To let the driver know which devices are 16-pin it is necessary to define
CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH in your board config file. This is used to
create an array of {chip, ngpio} tuples that are used
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de]
On Behalf Of Albert ARIBAUD
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 12:29 PM
To: Chris Moore
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/7] gpio: Add Multi-Function-Pin
Hi Marri,
On Thursday 09 December 2010 02:12:07 tma...@apm.com wrote:
From: Tirumala Marri tma...@apm.com
Adding Eiger board support for 460SX SoC.
Thanks. Some mostly nitpicking comments below.
First typo in the subject: s/Eeigier/Eiger.
snip
b/include/configs/eiger.h
new file mode
Dear zzs213,
Am 09.12.2010 09:39, schrieb zzs213:
I just clone the git repos. and build at91rm9200ek with eldk4.1,the error
message is same.
Ok, so ELDK 4.1 is not working. How about ELDK 4.2, CodeSourcery
2009q{1,3}, 2010q1, 2010.09?
I change start.S let it check whether the main osc of
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
In message 1290975538-18561-1-git-send-email...@denx.de you wrote:
Recent cleanup actions resulted in a number of config.mk files that
contained only redundant entries like
PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += -I$(TOPDIR)
or settings of variables that were not used anywhere in
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
In message 1290975538-18561-2-git-send-email...@denx.de you wrote:
Recent cleanup actions resulted in a number of config.mk files that
contained only LDSCRIPT definitions. Move these into th respective
board config files and remove the now empty config.mk files.
Since I originally made and checked the TOP9000 support patch some changes
to mainline broke the built. This small patch fixes this.
Signed-off-by: Reinhard Meyer u-b...@emk-elektronik.de
---
board/emk/top9000/Makefile |6 +++---
board/emk/top9000/top9000.c |2 +-
On 09/12/10 09:32, Nick Thompson wrote:
This change allows the davinci timer functions to be used before
relocation since it avoids using static variables prior to BSS being
made available.
The code is based on that used in the at91 timers, modified to use
a davinci specific hardware timer.
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4d008638.4060...@aribaud.net you wrote:
This patch is not needed, if no undefined weak symbol is available.
This patch adds .plt/.rel.plt section which has R_ARM_JUMP_SLOT which is
not handled in code. Therefore we do not really know what this patch does
Hello Heiko,
Is there a reason why the dtt sensors are initialized and accessed on
u-boot startup?
Historical reasons?
The U-Boot Design Principles[1] clearly say:
Initialize devices only when they are needed within U-Boot, i.e. don't
initialize the Ethernet interface(s) unless U-Boot
Hello,
here is some news. Not exactly good news it seems:
1) I had to rebase the next branch to remove a commit which
incorrectly changed behaviour of some commands.
2) By some stupid accident I lost track of some / most / all
ARM related patches that are supposed to go into the current
you are right, I use that method on u-boot-2010.09 for my own board(slightly
different from at91rm9200ek)
eldk4.1 is ok for 2010.09, eldk4.2 ok too
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Dear zzs213,
can you please leave some context when you answering to the list?
Am 09.12.2010 10:52, schrieb zzs213:
you are right, I use that method on u-boot-2010.09 for my own board(slightly
different from at91rm9200ek)
I guess you mean you are using a preloader on your NOR flash, is that
Dear Dan,
In message 750641c9-dc97-4923-b337-05a2f1bc9...@digitaldans.com you wrote:
Yes, I'm sometimes pleased :-)
Good :-)
My current thinking is to introduce something like .
Well, that is pretty cool.
dt_skip=memory,mac-address
Do we have to write a parser now,
Hi Wolfgang,
I sent on 24/11 a pull request, but I can't find it in the ML archive
and you have not yet merged, so it seems it was lost. I resubmit it as
it is. Drop this mail if you have already seen it.
The following changes since commit 8ad25bf8d9233eb7d0b614612108622a59069354:
Net:
Most of the Marvell SoCs has Multi Function Pin (MFP) configuration registers
For ex. ARMADA100.
These registers are programmed to expose the specific functionality
associated with respective SoC Pins
This driver provides configuration APIs,
using them, configuration need to be done in board
This patch adds commonly used macros for ARMADA100 based
baords, Also some code reshuffled and updated for typos and comments
Signed-off-by: Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com
---
Changelog v3:
CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_INIT moved out of #ifdef
Changelog v4:
CONFIG_MFP change to CONFIG_MARVELL_MFP
Dear zzs213,
can you please leave some context when you answering to the list?
Am 09.12.2010 10:52, schrieb zzs213:
you are right, I use that method on u-boot-2010.09 for my own board(slightly
different from at91rm9200ek)
I guess you mean you are using a preloader on your NOR flash, is that
Dear tma...@apm.com,
In message 1291857127-3265-1-git-send-email-tma...@apm.com you wrote:
Adding Eiger board support for 460SX SoC.
I understand the Eegier in the Subject: is a typo? That shouldbe
Eiger as well?
+
Dear York Sun,
In message 1291863340-4354-2-git-send-email-york...@freescale.com you wrote:
To temporarily fix buffer issue when running at flash, use bigger buffer
to push down the stack deeper.
What does this mean? temporarily fix ? Do you have another,
permanent fix in the works
From: Wojtek Skulski skul...@pas.rochester.edu
While we're here, cut out the useless id defines too.
Signed-off-by: Wojtek Skulski skul...@pas.rochester.edu
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
drivers/mtd/spi/winbond.c | 39 +--
1 files
From: Chong Huang chu...@ucrobotics.com
Signed-off-by: Chong Huang chu...@ucrobotics.com
Signed-off-by: Haitao Zhang minipa...@linuxrobot.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
drivers/mtd/spi/Makefile |1 +
drivers/mtd/spi/eon.c| 275
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 4d007f37.3010...@denx.de you wrote:
Is there a reason why the dtt sensors are initialized and accessed on
u-boot startup?
Someone once thought it was a good idea, and nobody fixed it since.
Should that be changed?
Yes.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4d007227.7020...@free.fr you wrote:
start.S:251: Error: bad arguments to instruction -- `add r1,r9'
It looks a illegal instruction in start.S
my toolchain is eldk4.1
ELDK 4.1 seems a bit old -- 4.2 has been available for some time now and
does not
Make code build with older tool chains.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de
---
arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/start.S |2 +-
arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/start.S |2 +-
arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/start.S |2 +-
arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/start.S |2 +-
arch/arm/cpu/arm925t/start.S |2 +-
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
In message 20101209094538.7b9bbd08...@gemini.denx.de you wrote:
Hm... strange...
I am absolutely sure that I did apply these patches last night, and
then I even pushed them out... ... but now I see no trace of this
either.
Don't know what happened (I should learn
Only the first run of boards had a ksz switch on it, so if building for a
newer silicon rev or SPI is disabled, don't bother checking for the ksz.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
board/bf518f-ezbrd/bf518f-ezbrd.c | 30 ++
1 files changed, 22
From: Andreas Schallenberg andreas.schallenb...@3alitydigital.de
Info about the hardware can be found here:
http://www.dilnetpc.com/dnp0086.htm
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schallenberg andreas.schallenb...@3alitydigital.de
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
v2
-
From: Chong Huang chu...@ucrobotics.com
Signed-off-by: Chong Huang chu...@ucrobotics.com
Signed-off-by: Haitao Zhang minipa...@linuxrobot.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
MAINTAINERS |5 ++
board/bf525-ucr2/Makefile | 54 ++
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
Am 09.12.2010 11:32, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
In message 20101209094538.7b9bbd08...@gemini.denx.de you wrote:
OK, I found the stuff. I have applied to my working copy of the master
branch instesd of ARM.
So only the -pie commit needs to be
Hello Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 4d007f37.3010...@denx.de you wrote:
Is there a reason why the dtt sensors are initialized and accessed on
u-boot startup?
Someone once thought it was a good idea, and nobody fixed it since.
Should that be changed?
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
Dear Albert Aribaud,
Am 09.12.2010 11:26, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4d007227.7020...@free.fr you wrote:
start.S:251: Error: bad arguments to instruction -- `add r1,r9'
It looks a illegal instruction in start.S
my toolchain is eldk4.1
I wrote:
/*
* Warning: changing CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE requires
- * adapting the initial boot program
+ * adapting the initial boot program.
+ * Guard it since the definition finds its way to the command-line and
+ * causes warnings when this file is included
*/
-#define
Dear Andreas Bießmann,
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
Dear Albert Aribaud,
Am 09.12.2010 11:26, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message 4d007227.7020...@free.fr you wrote:
start.S:251: Error: bad arguments to instruction -- `add r1,r9'
It looks a illegal instruction in start.S
my
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
Am 09.12.2010 10:52, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
2) By some stupid accident I lost track of some / most / all
ARM related patches that are supposed to go into the current
release and/or next; unfortunately I also maked these as applied'
in patchwork.
If you have
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
Am 09.12.2010 13:08, schrieb Andreas Bießmann:
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
Am 09.12.2010 10:52, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
2) By some stupid accident I lost track of some / most / all
ARM related patches that are supposed to go into the current
release and/or next;
Hi
I am new to uboot and I would like to learn it under an emulator
instead of a remote target. For instance, I'd like to experiment it
with the Android operating system. So far, I have tried qemu (utility
qemu-system-arm) to boot the kernel or an arm+uboot bootable sd flash
image on x86
Le 01/12/2010 00:58, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
This patch uses r1 as scratch register for copy_loop(). Therefore we do
not longer need r7 for the storage of relocate_code()'s 'addr_moni' (the
destination address of relocation).
Therefore r7 can be used later on for other purposes.
Le 01/12/2010 00:58, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
r8 is used for global_data and should therefore be left alone!
For C code the compiler flag --fixed-r8 does the job, but in assembler
we need to be aware of that fact.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bießmannandreas.de...@googlemail.com
Acked-By:
Le 01/12/2010 00:58, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
I doubt the stack_setup() was defective before:
we load the current location of _start and compare against destination
of relocate_code(). If we are already there we shoud skip the
relocation and jump over to clear_bss. Before the clear_bss
Le 01/12/2010 00:58, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
In case we are still at relocation target address before relocation we
do not need to load the registers needed for relocation. We should
instead skip the whole relocation part and jump over to clear_bss
immediately.
Signed-off-by: Andreas
Le 01/12/2010 00:58, Andreas Bießmann a écrit :
In case we are still at relocation target address before relocation we
do not need to load the registers needed for relocation. We should
instead skip the whole relocation part and jump over to clear_bss
immediately.
Signed-off-by: Andreas
Dear =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Bie=DFmann?=,
In message 4d00c813.2010...@gmail.com you wrote:
can you please mark http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/73563/ as superseeded?
This is the patch which should not go into mainline but has 'accepted'
state.
Done.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Dear =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Bie=DFmann?=,
In message 4d00c6a5.9010...@gmail.com you wrote:
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
Am 09.12.2010 10:52, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
2) By some stupid accident I lost track of some / most / all
ARM related patches that are supposed to go into the current
The U-Boot Design Principles[1] clearly say:
Initialize devices only when they are needed within U-Boot, i.e. don't
initialize the Ethernet interface(s) unless U-Boot performs a download
over Ethernet; don't initialize any IDE or USB devices unless U-Boot
actually tries to load files from
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 1291903238-29071-1-git-send-email...@denx.de you wrote:
--- a/common/cmd_dtt.c
+++ b/common/cmd_dtt.c
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
#include dtt.h
#include i2c.h
+static unsigned long sensors_init_done = 0;
What if there are more then 32 sensors?
int do_dtt
Hello Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message 1291903238-29071-1-git-send-email...@denx.de you wrote:
--- a/common/cmd_dtt.c
+++ b/common/cmd_dtt.c
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
#include dtt.h
#include i2c.h
+static unsigned long sensors_init_done = 0;
What if there are more then 32 sensors?
The following commit:
commit 46e91674fb4b6d06c6a4984c0b5ac7d9a16923f4
Author: Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com
Date: Tue Nov 3 17:52:07 2009 -0600
tsec: Force TBI PHY to 1000Mbps full duplex in SGMII mode
Removed setting Auto-Neg by default, however this is believed to be
proper default
On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Peter Tyser wrote:
From: John Schmoller jschmol...@xes-inc.com
According to Freescale reference manuals (eg section 13.4.4.2
Programming the UPMs of the P4080 Reference Manual):
Since the result of any update to the MxMR/MDR register must be in
effect before
In common/dlmalloc.c in the heap initialization mem_malloc_init() [1]
it looks like the whole heap is initialized with zero:
memset((void *)mem_malloc_start, 0, size);
What's the reason for doing this? I know that the .bss segment has to
be zeroed at system start up, but why doing this for
Reuse the gd-tbl value for timestamp and add gd-lastinc for lastinc bss
values in the OMAP timer driver.
The usage of bss values in drivers before initialisation of bss is forbidden.
In that special case some data in .rel.dyn gets corrupted.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@gmail.com
---
On 04.12.2010 11:48, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 04/12/2010 10:33, Dirk Behme a écrit :
Also make sure that the r8 register is not trashed by the relocation
code in the start.S used for this board. See Andreas' patch for that.
Thanks for the hint! Most probably you mean
With the latest from the u-boot-atmel area, the symbols below don't seem
to be defined.
Thanks,
James
--- error
arm-eabi-gcc -g -Os -fno-common -ffixed-r8 -msoft-float
-D__KERNEL__ -DCONF
IG_SYS_TEXT_BASE=0x21f0 -I/home/jkosin/git/u-boot-atmel/include
-fno-builtin
-ffreestanding
Dear James Kosin,
Am 09.12.2010 17:49, schrieb James Kosin:
With the latest from the u-boot-atmel area, the symbols below don't seem
to be defined.
at91rm9200dk is orphaned. We had a lot of changes for arm devices and a
lot of them do not work now. Please see git history what I did for
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 22:11 +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
This adds support for for the PCA9535/PCA9539 family of gpio devices which
have 16 output pins.
To let the driver know which devices are 16-pin it is necessary to define
CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA953X_WIDTH in your board config file. This is
On 12/9/2010 12:08 PM, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
Dear James Kosin,
Am 09.12.2010 17:49, schrieb James Kosin:
With the latest from the u-boot-atmel area, the symbols below don't seem
to be defined.
at91rm9200dk is orphaned. We had a lot of changes for arm devices and a
lot of them do not work
By rearranging the linker script we get support for
relocation of -fpic for free.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
Ping?
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
By rearranging the linker script we get support for
relocation of -fpic for free.
Move __got2_entries outside _GOT2_TABLE_ defining scope
matching the rest of PowerPC
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
Ping?
___
U-Boot
Hi,
2010/11/29 Debashish Rath debashish.r...@tridentmicro.com:
Dear Mr. Wolfgang,
Please find the patch for the same. This is ok or I have to prepare a
different mail and send the patch as an attachment.
No, please not post it as attachment.
Regards
Debashish Rath
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 4d00f98b.1010...@denx.de you wrote:
+static unsigned long sensors_init_done = 0;
What if there are more then 32 sensors?
Ok, that would not work ... Hmm.. I can get the number of DTTs on a board
with ARRAY_SIZE(CONFIG_DTT_SENSORS) ... should I use this
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:30:38 -0600
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
By rearranging the linker script we get support for
relocation of -fpic for free.
Move __got2_entries outside _GOT2_TABLE_ defining scope
matching the rest of PowerPC
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund
Hi,
2010/12/1 Lei Wen lei...@marvell.com:
Since the ether may not be the only one usb gadget would be used
in the uboot, it is neccessary to do the register each time the
eth begin to work to make usb gadget driver less confussed when
we want to use two different usb gadget at the same time.
Dear stefano babic,
In message 4d00a9dd.5030...@denx.de you wrote:
I sent on 24/11 a pull request, but I can't find it in the ML archive
and you have not yet merged, so it seems it was lost. I resubmit it as
it is. Drop this mail if you have already seen it.
Sorry, seems I really missed
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:30:38 -0600
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
By rearranging the linker script we get support for
relocation of -fpic for free.
Move __got2_entries outside _GOT2_TABLE_ defining scope
matching the rest of PowerPC
Signed-off-by: Joakim
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:30:38 -0600
Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
By rearranging the linker script we get support for
relocation of -fpic for free.
Move __got2_entries outside _GOT2_TABLE_ defining scope
matching the rest of PowerPC
Signed-off-by:
Your Email Id Won £950,000.00 In Mercedes Benz Xmas Promo. For Claims Send
Name.
Address..
Tel...___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:31 AM, Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com wrote:
Reuse the gd-tbl value for timestamp and add gd-lastinc for lastinc bss
values in the OMAP timer driver.
The usage of bss values in drivers before initialisation of bss is forbidden.
In that special case some data in
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com wrote:
Reuse the gd-tbl value for timestamp and add gd-lastinc for lastinc bss
values in the OMAP timer driver.
The usage of bss values in drivers before initialisation of bss is forbidden.
In that special case some data in
I am sending this to the list looking for comments. Testing has been
confined to just a few USB sticks - no USB hard drives, USB card
readers, etc. But there are reports on the mailing list of problems
with U-Boot's detection of USB mass storage devices.
We have had a lot of problems with
Loan Offer at 3% Low Interest Rate Contact Us Now Name: loan Amount:Phone
Number.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi
I am not able to implement scanf function in standalone application in Uboot
OR implement scanf in POST
Please help in this regard
Saurabh Kumar narang
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On 09.12.2010 17:31, Dirk Behme wrote:
Reuse the gd-tbl value for timestamp and add gd-lastinc for lastinc bss
values in the OMAP timer driver.
The usage of bss values in drivers before initialisation of bss is forbidden.
In that special case some data in .rel.dyn gets corrupted.
Hello Dirk,
Dirk Behme wrote:
Reuse the gd-tbl value for timestamp and add gd-lastinc for lastinc bss
values in the OMAP timer driver.
The usage of bss values in drivers before initialisation of bss is forbidden.
In that special case some data in .rel.dyn gets corrupted.
Signed-off-by:
Le 10/12/2010 05:32, saurabh narang a écrit :
Hi
I am not able to implement scanf function in standalone application in Uboot
OR implement scanf in POST
Please help in this regard
Saurabh Kumar narang
Hum... Implementing a function you need should be your own lookout.
However, if you
Hello Dirk,
Heiko Schocher wrote:
Dirk Behme wrote:
Reuse the gd-tbl value for timestamp and add gd-lastinc for lastinc bss
values in the OMAP timer driver.
The usage of bss values in drivers before initialisation of bss is forbidden.
In that special case some data in .rel.dyn gets
Dear Dirk Behme,
In message 4d01b92e.8050...@googlemail.com you wrote:
Note: This is compile tested only (therefore the RFC). Please *test*
on real OMAP HW, e.g. Beagle.
To the custodian who has to apply this: Regarding the RFC in the
subject: Now that this patch is confirmed to
77 matches
Mail list logo
