[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] sh: Update sh timer function

Change to write/readX fcuntion and fix timer bug. Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- cpu/sh2/Makefile|2 +- cpu/sh3/Makefile|2 +- cpu/sh3/time.c | 103 --- cpu/sh4/Makefile

Re: [U-Boot] mini-pci wireless driver

> > > With the Ralink chip it's not too much complicate to add wifi support. > > > You need to upload the firmware and manage the wifi configuration via > > the > > > firmware. After it will work as ant other ethernet driver. > > > > Thank you, I will ask for the Ralink chip information from manuf

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Changed 460EX/GT OCM TLB and internal SRAM initialization

Expanded OCM TLB to allow access to 64K OCM as well as 256K of internal SRAM. Adjusted internal SRAM initialization to match updated user manual recommendation. Signed-off-by: Dave Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/amcc/canyonlands/init.S |2 +- cpu/ppc4xx/start.S| 27

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Added ppc4xx-isram.h for internal SRAM and L2 cache DCRs

Added include/asm-ppc/ppc4xx-isram.h and moved internal SRAM and L2 cache DCRs from ppc440.h to this new header. Also converted these DCR defines from lowercase to uppercase and modified referencing modules to use them. Signed-off-by: Dave Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/amcc/luan/luan.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5 v2] powerpc: 83xx: add support for the kmeter1 board

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:11:32 +0100 Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MAINTAINERS |1 + > MAKEALL |1 + > Makefile|3 + > board/keymile/kmeter1/Makefile | 51 > board/keymile/kmeter1/config.mk | 24

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: Improve the performance of DDR memory

On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 14:55:33 +0800 Dave Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Howard Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > modify the CAS timings. my understanding is that these > settings decrease various wait times in the DDR interface. > Because these wait times are in clock cycles, and the DDR > c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5 v2] powerpc: 83xx: add missing TIMING_CFG1_CASLAT_* defines

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:10:30 +0100 Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> applied to u-boot-mpc83xx master Kim ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-b

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5 v2] powerpc: 83xx: support for the SMSC LAN8700 PHY

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:09:38 +0100 Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Heiko, > - rebased against current HEAD > commit e0b0ec843085f96f4fe0738424835ee90e58bc00 > > drivers/qe/uec_phy.c | 59 > ++ > 1 files changed, 59 insertions(

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] mpc83xx: New board support SIMPC8313

On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:13:15 -0800 Ron Madrid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This patch will create a new board, SIMPC8313, from Sheldon Instruments. > This board boots from NAND devices and is configureable for either large or > small page devices. The board supports non-soldered DDR2, one ethe

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 11/11 v4] ARM: Add Apollon UBI support

Hi, On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:43 AM, Magnus Lilja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > 2008/11/19 Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> From: Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> To enable UBI on Apollon you need to uncomment the CONFIG_SYS_USE_UBI >> macro. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[E

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 11/11 v4] ARM: Add Apollon UBI support

Hi 2008/11/19 Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > From: Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To enable UBI on Apollon you need to uncomment the CONFIG_SYS_USE_UBI > macro. > > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > board/apollon

[U-Boot] [PATCH 10/11 v4] UBI: Add UBI command support

From: Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch adds these UBI commands: ubi part [nand|onenand] [part] - Show or set current partition ubi info [l[ayout]] -Display volume and UBI layout information ubi create[vol] volume [size] [type] - Create volume name with size ubi write[vol] address volu

[U-Boot] [PATCH 11/11 v4] ARM: Add Apollon UBI support

From: Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To enable UBI on Apollon you need to uncomment the CONFIG_SYS_USE_UBI macro. Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- board/apollon/Makefile|3 +- include/configs/apollon.h | 74

[U-Boot] [PATCH 09/11 v4] UBI: Add basic UBI support to U-Boot (Part 8/8)

From: Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch adds basic UBI (Unsorted Block Image) support to U-Boot. It's based on the Linux UBI version and basically has a "OS" translation wrapper that defines most Linux specific calls (spin_lock() etc.) into no-ops. Some source code parts have been uncom

[U-Boot] [PATCH 08/11 v4] UBI: Add basic UBI support to U-Boot (Part 7/8)

From: Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch adds basic UBI (Unsorted Block Image) support to U-Boot. It's based on the Linux UBI version and basically has a "OS" translation wrapper that defines most Linux specific calls (spin_lock() etc.) into no-ops. Some source code parts have been uncom

[U-Boot] [PATCH 07/11 v4] UBI: Add basic UBI support to U-Boot (Part 6/8)

From: Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch adds basic UBI (Unsorted Block Image) support to U-Boot. It's based on the Linux UBI version and basically has a "OS" translation wrapper that defines most Linux specific calls (spin_lock() etc.) into no-ops. Some source code parts have been uncom

[U-Boot] [PATCH 02/11 v4] UBI: Add basic UBI support to U-Boot (Part 1/8)

From: Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch adds basic UBI (Unsorted Block Image) support to U-Boot. It's based on the Linux UBI version and basically has a "OS" translation wrapper that defines most Linux specific calls (spin_lock() etc.) into no-ops. Some source code parts have been uncom

[U-Boot] [PATCH 01/11 v4] MTD: Add MTD paritioning infrastructure

From: Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This MTD part infrastructure will be used by the upcoming UBI support. Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/mtd/Makefile |1 + drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 146 ++ drivers

[U-Boot] [PATCH 00/11 v4] Add UBI support

This patch series adds UBI support to U-Boot: UBI (Latin: "where?") stands for "Unsorted Block Images". It is a volume management system for flash devices which manages multiple logical volumes on a single physical flash device and spreads the I/O load (i.e, wear-leveling) across the whole flas

Re: [U-Boot] Code style questions (weak functions, cpu/ v's lib_arch/)

Dear Jon, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Come now! WD is never disagreeable! He may disagree with you, > but I've always found him to be a rather pleasant sort of fellow! Thanks, Jon. But there are days when I'm in a bad mood and cannot see the wood for the trees myself. Best r

Re: [U-Boot] Linux booting speed up.

Dear Michele, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > I am using UBoot on a AT91RM9200 target supporting Linux 2.4.27. > I would like to accelerate the boot process, while keeping Kernel and > RamDisk compressed on Flash EPROM. Not to forget: using a ramdisk itself is a major mistake if you

Re: [U-Boot] Linux booting speed up.

Dear Michele, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > I am using UBoot on a AT91RM9200 target supporting Linux 2.4.27. > I would like to accelerate the boot process, while keeping Kernel and > RamDisk compressed on Flash EPROM. ... > Instead of copying the compressed RamDisk Flash code to SDR

[U-Boot] PATCH: mpc8xx PLPRCR (init_pll_866)

Signed-off-by: Spencer Putt Raytheon Company The current init_pll_866 makes a bad assumption for the oscillator. A board with a slower oscillator may lead to PLPRCR fields overflowing their bounds and making the board not boot. This patch should more accurately set the PLPRCR regardless of the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] powerpc: keymile: Add a check for the PIGGY debug board

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:03:44 +0100 Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gary Jennejohn schrieb: > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:30:51 -0800 > > Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [snip] > >> That's what board_eth_init() and cpu_eth_init() are for. In addition, I > >> forgot to mention

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5 v2] powerpc: keymile: Add a check for the PIGGY debug board

Hi Heiko, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Check the presence of the PIGGY on the keymile boards mgcoge, > mgsuvd and kmeter1. If the PIGGY is not present, dont register > this Ethernet device. > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > > changes since v1: > > - rebased against current H

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] XPedite5370 board support

Hi Jon, On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 11:29 -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote: > Peter Tyser wrote: > > >>> We have the standard Freescale DDR printf's turned into debug as that is > >>> much, much more verbose than the output above. > >> Indeed :-( > > Hrm. Out of curiosity, which printf()s do you find noisy?

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] powerpc: keymile: Add a check for the PIGGY debug board

Hi Gary, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:30:51 -0800 > Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Heiko Schocher wrote: >> >>> Hello Ben >>> >>> Ben Warren wrote: >>> >>> Heiko Schocher wrote: > Check the presence of the P

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] XPedite5370 board support

Peter Tyser wrote: >>> We have the standard Freescale DDR printf's turned into debug as that is >>> much, much more verbose than the output above. >> Indeed :-( Hrm. Out of curiosity, which printf()s do you find noisy? > Many boards I look at don't use TABS. In particular Freescale reference >

Re: [U-Boot] Code style questions (weak functions, cpu/ v's lib_arch/)

Mike Frysinger wrote: > i doubt it. the only hard & fast rule is dont make Wolfgang disagreeable. > -mike Come now! WD is never disagreeable! He may disagree with you, but I've always found him to be a rather pleasant sort of fellow! jdl ___ U-Boot

[U-Boot] IDE and USB error

Hi everyone: I've started to work with Freescale M5329EVB board. And i'm trying to configure U-boot (2008.10 version compiling with m68k-elf-) in order to attach the USB and IDE, Compact Flash utilities, but at compiling i get the errors attached. Any one knows where variables like CFG_IDE_MAXBUS

[U-Boot] Linux booting speed up.

I am using UBoot on a AT91RM9200 target supporting Linux 2.4.27. I would like to accelerate the boot process, while keeping Kernel and RamDisk compressed on Flash EPROM. 1010 address of compressed Kernel on Flash. 1020 address of compressed RamDisk on Flash. 2110 address of uncompress

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Bits reversed in ppc4xx.h

The bits in ppc440.h for the SDR0_DDRCFG register are incorrect. The register is numbered in big-endian mode, so for example, the LT2 bit (bit 23) should be represented as 0x0100 rather than 0x0100. Signed-off-by: Steven A. Falco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/include/ppc440.h b/in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/10] AVR32: RFC/preview - support for ATEVK1100 evaluation board

Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Haavard Skinnemoen, > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > I've applied this and the other series you posted to the 'evk1100' > > branch in > > > > git://git.denx.de/u-boot-avr32.git evk1100 > > > > Please submit incremental patche

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/10] AVR32: RFC/preview - support for ATEVK1100 evaluation board

Dear Haavard Skinnemoen, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > I've applied this and the other series you posted to the 'evk1100' > branch in > > git://git.denx.de/u-boot-avr32.git evk1100 > > Please submit incremental patches addressing the comments you got > during review. Umm... bu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix FDT support to use fdt blob and FIT together or not

On 15:22 Wed 19 Nov , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > > Yes, of course we may have both at the same time. > > > > with my modification > > > > I'd like to support the 3 following configurations : > > > > 1)

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/10] AVR32: RFC/preview - support for ATEVK1100 evaluation board

Olav Morken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a patch series which adds support for the ATEVK1100 evaluation > board[1], and the AT32UC3A0xxx[2] microcontrollers used on that board. > The patch series is based on avr32/next. I've applied this and the other series you posted to the 'evk1100' bra

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MIPS: Flush data cache upon relocation

Stefan Roese wrote: > This patch now adds a flush to the data cache upon relocation. The > current implementation is missing this. Only a comment states that it > should be done. So let's really do it now. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Shinya Kuribayashi <[EMAIL PR

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] flash: Export flash_sector_size() function.

Piotr Zięcik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wednesday 19 November 2008 14:51:01 Haavard Skinnemoen napisał(a): > > > Export flash_sector_size() function from drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c. > > > > Why? > > This function is used by cfi-mtd driver, which I have posted yesterday > with other patches arou

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MIPS: Add CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT

Stefan Roese wrote: > This patch adds the CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT option to start.S. This > enables support for boards where the lowlevel initialization is > already done when U-Boot runs (e.g. via OnChip ROM). > > This will be used in the upcoming VCTH board support. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] flash: Export flash_sector_size() function.

Wednesday 19 November 2008 14:51:01 Haavard Skinnemoen napisał(a): > > Export flash_sector_size() function from drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c. > > Why? This function is used by cfi-mtd driver, which I have posted yesterday with other patches around UBI and MTD (see "[U-Boot] Export CFI Flash to the MTD

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix FDT support to use fdt blob and FIT together or not

Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > Yes, of course we may have both at the same time. > > with my modification > > I'd like to support the 3 following configurations : > > 1) FIT only CONFIG_FIT > 2) fdt blob only CONFIG_OF_LIBFD

Re: [U-Boot] weak functions versus conditional compile

On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 14:54 +0100, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 17 November 2008 16:17:54 Graeme Russ wrote: > > > Should I declare these functions as weak in the core i386 code and use a > > > config #define to override or should I seperate th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] common/cmd_ide.c: Corrected endian order printing for compact flash serial number.

Hi Wolfgang, By no means is this a critical patch, I'm just a bit obsessive about tying up loose ends (or patches) Is there a custodian I should ping for feedback on this patch, or are you it? Thanks for your time - Richard Richard Retanubun wrote: > Corrected endian order printing for compa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/10] AVR32: CPU support for AT32UC3A0xxx CPUs

Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +static inline unsigned long get_hsb_clk_rate(void) > > +{ > > + //TODO HSB is always the same as cpu-rate > ---^^ > > + return MAIN_CLK_RATE >> CFG_CLKDIV_CPU; Simply removing this comment should be fine. Haavard

Re: [U-Boot] weak functions versus conditional compile

Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 17 November 2008 16:17:54 Graeme Russ wrote: > > Should I declare these functions as weak in the core i386 code and use a > > config #define to override or should I seperate the functions out into > > seperate source files and use conditional co

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] cfi_flash: Make all flash access functions weak

Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This patch defines all flash access functions as weak so that > they can be overridden by board specific versions. > > This will be used by the upcoming VCTH board support where the NOR > FLASH unfortunately can't be accessed memory-mapped. Special > acces

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] flash: Export flash_sector_size() function.

Piotr Ziecik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Export flash_sector_size() function from drivers/mtd/cfi_flash.c. > > Signed-off-by: Piotr Ziecik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Why? Haavard ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/10] AVR32: CPU support for AT32UC3A0xxx CPUs

Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Olav Morken, > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > This patch adds support for the AT32UC3A0xxx chips. > > > > Signed-off-by: Gunnar Rangoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Signed-off-by: Paul Driveklepp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Signed-off-by: Ola

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix FDT support to use fdt blob and FIT together or not

On 14:10 Wed 19 Nov , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC) || defined(CONFIG_M68K) > > > > > > Maybe "|| defined(CONFIG_SPARC)" is missing here? > > no this function is only use on PPC

[U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-sparc

Dear Wolfgang, Please pull from the master branch at git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-sparc.git I have rebased it against the mainline today. Best regards, Daniel Hellstrom The following changes since commit 9b827cf1720acda2473afa516956eab6f7cca9a1: Selvamuthukumar (1): Align end of bss

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix FDT support to use fdt blob and FIT together or not

Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC) || defined(CONFIG_M68K) > > > > Maybe "|| defined(CONFIG_SPARC)" is missing here? > no this function is only use on PPC and M68K bootm Then, again, we should add a feature-specific #

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/10] AVR32: Disable relocation of command table when on AT32UC3A for now

Wolfgang Denk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Due to a bug with the SDRAM-controller, running code from the SDRAM is > > impossible. This patch disables relocation of the command table on those > > chips. > > You are aware that this is dangerous, as it

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] powerpc: keymile: Add a check for the PIGGY debug board

Hello Gray, Gary Jennejohn schrieb: > On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:30:51 -0800 > Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Heiko Schocher wrote: >>> Hello Ben >>> >>> Ben Warren wrote: >>> Heiko Schocher wrote: > Check the presence of the PIGGY on the keymile boards mgcog

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91rm9200: fix broken boot from nor flash

On 10:48 Tue 18 Nov , Jens Scharsig wrote: > This patch fix the broken boot from NOR Flash on AT91RM9200 boards, if > CONFIG_AT91RM9200 is defined and nor preloader is used. > > Please see >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] powerpc: keymile: Add a check for the PIGGY debug board

On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:30:51 -0800 Ben Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Heiko Schocher wrote: > > Hello Ben > > > > Ben Warren wrote: > > > >> Heiko Schocher wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Check the presence of the PIGGY on the keymile boards mgcoge, > >>> mgsuvd and kmeter1. If the PIGGY is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dataflash: fix a problem with the last partition

On 16:41 Mon 27 Oct , Ilko Iliev wrote: > This patch fix the problem that only the [NB_DATAFLASH_AREA -1] dataflash > partition can be defined to use the area to the end of dataflash size. > Now it is possible to have only one dataflash partition from 0 to the end of > of dataflash size. plea

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] dataflash: fix a problem with the last partition

On 00:22 Wed 19 Nov , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > > This patch fix the problem that only the [NB_DATAFLASH_AREA -1] dataflash > > > partition can be defined to use the area to the end of dataflash size. >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix FDT support to use fdt blob and FIT together or not

On 12:44 Wed 19 Nov , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > FDT support is used for both FIT style images and architectures > > (ppc, m68k, sparc) that can pass a fdt blob to an OS.. > > We should not fix this on any ar

Re: [U-Boot] U-boot build failes with armv5tel-reghat-linux-gnueabi-gcc (4.1.2)

On 03:10 Wed 19 Nov , Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: > Hi > I am using u-boot-1.1.6 and building u-boot from my new board which includes > nand flash support > > If I build using armv5tel-reghat-linux-gnueabi-gcc (4.1.2) toolchain it gives > build failure with below log > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix FIT and fdt blob support to have CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT and CONFIG_FIT independant

Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > FDT support is used for both FIT style images and architectures (ppc, m68k, > sparc) > that can pass a fdt blob to an OS.. > > For other arch and board which do not pass a fdt blob to an OS but want to use > the n

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix FDT support to use fdt blob and FIT together or not

Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > FDT support is used for both FIT style images and architectures > (ppc, m68k, sparc) that can pass a fdt blob to an OS.. We should not fix this on any architectures. They have nothing to do with this. Please write

[U-Boot] U-boot build failes with armv5tel-reghat-linux-gnueabi-gcc (4.1.2)

Hi I am using u-boot-1.1.6 and building u-boot from my new board which includes nand flash support If I build using armv5tel-reghat-linux-gnueabi-gcc (4.1.2) toolchain it gives build failure with below log --start-group lib_generic/libgeneric.a board/Marvell/rd6281/lib

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5 v2] powerpc, keymile boards: extract identical config options

This patch extracts the identical config options for the keymile boards mgcoge, mgsuvd and kmeter1 in a new common config file keymile-common.h. Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- changes since v1: - rebased against current HEAD commit e0b0ec843085f96f4fe0738424835ee90e58bc00

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5 v2] powerpc: keymile: Add a check for the PIGGY debug board

Check the presence of the PIGGY on the keymile boards mgcoge, mgsuvd and kmeter1. If the PIGGY is not present, dont register this Ethernet device. Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- changes since v1: - rebased against current HEAD commit e0b0ec843085f96f4fe0738424835ee90e58b

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5 v2] powerpc: 83xx: add support for the kmeter1 board

This patch adds support for the kmeter1 board from Keymile, based on a Freescale MPC8360 CPU. - serial console on UART 1 - 256 MB DDR2 RAM - 64 MB NOR Flash - Ethernet RMII Mode over UCC4 - PHY SMSC LAN8700 Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- changes since v1: - rebased against

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5 v2] powerpc: 83xx: add missing TIMING_CFG1_CASLAT_* defines

Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- changes since v1: - rebased against current HEAD commit e0b0ec843085f96f4fe0738424835ee90e58bc00 include/mpc83xx.h |4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/mpc83xx.h b/include/mpc83xx.h index a2c0

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5 v2] powerpc: 83xx: support for the SMSC LAN8700 PHY

Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- changes since v1: - rebased against current HEAD commit e0b0ec843085f96f4fe0738424835ee90e58bc00 drivers/qe/uec_phy.c | 59 ++ 1 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5 v2] powerpc: 83xx: add support for the 8360 based kmeter1 board.

Hello This patch series adds support for the keymile board kmeter1 based on a MPC8360 CPU from freescale. The patches 1/5 - 3/5 are adding the basic support for this board. The patches 4/5 and 5/5 do some common cleanups for the keymile boards. changes since v1: - rebased against current HEAD

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH-OMAP3 v2] OMAP3: Fix gpmc_cs_base pointer math in NAND

On 20:58 Mon 10 Nov , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > gpmc_cs_base is an uint32_t pointer, correct pointer math. Missed after > readl/writel conversion. > > Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > Changes in v2: > > - Correct patch header style. > > v2 of this patch makes prev

Re: [U-Boot] Simple question about the TEXT_BASE

TEXT_BASE is, in a general and coarse way, the address where the Uboot starts from the flash. For ARM architecture, instead, it's the relocation address, i.e. the ram address where the uboot relocates itself. Chengzhi Li ha scritto: > Hi everyone: > I am a freshman in the embedded development

[U-Boot] Simple question about the TEXT_BASE

Hi everyone: I am a freshman in the embedded development area. I have a simple question about the TEXT_BASE. When I port the Das U-Boot to my S3C2440 board, I found that the TEXT_BASE equal to 0x33F8000 which is seen in the u-boot-xxx/board/smdk2410/config.mk. I want to know the function of thi