Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/19] configs: Add FPGA loadfs config for Arria 10

On Sel, 2017-08-29 at 13:51 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 08/29/2017 12:45 PM, tien.fong.c...@intel.com wrote: > > > > From: Tien Fong Chee > > > > This config allow FPGA design loaded from FAT fs to FPGA manager. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/8] sf: improve support of (Q)SPI flash memories

On 2017/8/30 13:41, Bin Meng wrote: On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Yang, Wenyou wrote: On 2017/8/30 11:43, Bin Meng wrote: On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Yang, Wenyou wrote: On 2017/8/26 14:34, Jagan Teki wrote: Hi, Thanks for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/8] sf: improve support of (Q)SPI flash memories

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Yang, Wenyou wrote: > > > On 2017/8/30 11:43, Bin Meng wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Yang, Wenyou >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2017/8/26 14:34, Jagan Teki wrote: Hi, Thanks for

Re: [U-Boot] DA850evm SPI Flash Partitions between Linux and U-boot are Inconsistent

On Wednesday 30 August 2017 08:07 AM, Adam Ford wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Adam Ford wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:41 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >>> On Tuesday 29 August 2017 03:29 PM, Adam Ford wrote: On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:13 AM,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/8] sf: improve support of (Q)SPI flash memories

On 2017/8/30 11:43, Bin Meng wrote: On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Yang, Wenyou wrote: On 2017/8/26 14:34, Jagan Teki wrote: Hi, Thanks for the changes. On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Wenyou Yang wrote: This series of patches

[U-Boot] [PATCH] libfdt: Initialize the stack variable

From: Tien Fong Chee Report Coverity log: The code uses a variable that has not been initialized, leading to unpredictable or unintended results. Reported-by: Coverity (CID: 60519) Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee --- lib/libfdt/fdt_wip.c |

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] libfdt: Initialize the stack variable

On Kha, 2017-08-24 at 21:04 -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 01:53:57PM +0800, tien.fong.c...@intel.com > wrote: > > > > > From: Tien Fong Chee > > > > Report Coverity log: > > The code uses a variable that has not > > been initialized, leading to

Re: [U-Boot] ** Can't read Driver Desriptor Block **

On 08/30/2017 03:54 AM, Bin Meng wrote: > Hi Heinrich, > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 4:26 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt > wrote: >> Hello Simon, >> >> U-Boot HEAD qemu-86_defconfig cannot discover an IDE disk with one FAT >> partition in qemu-system-x86_64. >> >> By bisection I

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/8] sf: improve support of (Q)SPI flash memories

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Yang, Wenyou wrote: > > > On 2017/8/26 14:34, Jagan Teki wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for the changes. >> >> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Wenyou Yang >> wrote: >>> >>> This series of patches are based

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/8] sf: improve support of (Q)SPI flash memories

On 2017/8/26 14:34, Jagan Teki wrote: Hi, Thanks for the changes. On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Wenyou Yang wrote: This series of patches are based and have been tested on the 'master' branch of the u-boot.git tree. Tests were passed with a sama5d2 xplained

Re: [U-Boot] DA850evm SPI Flash Partitions between Linux and U-boot are Inconsistent

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Adam Ford wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:41 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Tuesday 29 August 2017 03:29 PM, Adam Ford wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:13 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: Hi Adam, On

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/8] sf: improve support of (Q)SPI flash memories

Hi Jagan, On 2017/8/26 14:34, Jagan Teki wrote: Hi, Thanks for the changes. On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Wenyou Yang wrote: This series of patches are based and have been tested on the 'master' branch of the u-boot.git tree. Tests were passed with a sama5d2

Re: [U-Boot] ** Can't read Driver Desriptor Block **

Hi Heinrich, On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 4:26 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > Hello Simon, > > U-Boot HEAD qemu-86_defconfig cannot discover an IDE disk with one FAT > partition in qemu-system-x86_64. > > By bisection I found this patch. > >

Re: [U-Boot] undefined reference to `environment'

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 6:07 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 17:18:24 -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > >> So there's something extra funny going on in the linking. See >> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/806263/ which I have included,

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] sunxi: dts: added emac node for nanopi m1 plus

From: Philipp Rossak The sun8i emac hardware is present on the Nanopi M1. It uses an external PHY. Signed-off-by: Philipp Rossak --- arch/arm/dts/sun8i-h3-nanopi-m1-plus.dts | 30 ++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] sunxi: defconfig: enable sun8i emac on nanopi m1

From: Philipp Rossak The sun8i emac hardware is present on the Nanopi M1. It uses the internal PHY. Signed-off-by: Philipp Rossak --- configs/nanopi_m1_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/configs/nanopi_m1_defconfig

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] sunxi: defconfig: enable sun8i emac on nanopi m1 plus

From: Philipp Rossak The sun8i emac hardware is present on the Nanopi M1. It uses an external PHY. Pin PD6 is used to enable the external PHY. Signed-off-by: Philipp Rossak --- configs/nanopi_m1_plus_defconfig | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] sunxi: dts: added emac node for nanopi m1

From: Philipp Rossak The sun8i emac hardware is present on the Nanopi M1. It uses the internal PHY. Signed-off-by: Philipp Rossak --- arch/arm/dts/sun8i-h3-nanopi-m1.dts | 11 +++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] Enable ethernet on nanopi m1 and nanopi m1 plus

From: Philipp Rossak This Patchseries enables the ethernet for the Friendlyarm Nanopi M1 and the Friendlyarm Nanopi M1 Plus. Philipp Rossak (4): sunxi: defconfig: enable sun8i emac on nanopi m1 sunxi: defconfig: enable sun8i emac on nanopi m1 plus sunxi: dts: added

[U-Boot] [GIT PULL] u-boot-uniphier/master

Hi Tom, Here is a bit volume pull request, but changes are SoC-specific except the ofnode patch and denali_dt. The latter is reviewed by Simon. - add {ofnode,dev}_read_resource_byname - provide DT probe hook to Denali NAND driver - update clk/reset driver - update DT - misc cleanups The

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: uniphier: move CONFIG_NAND to defconfig

2017-08-29 15:41 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > This imply was added when the option was moved by the moveconfig tool, > but the intention is not clear. Move it to defconfig. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada > --- Applied to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: uniphier: enable Denali NAND driver for 64bit SoCs

2017-08-30 1:04 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > Now the entry to the NAND driver init can be is controlled by DT; > it should not hurt to compile the driver all the time. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada > --- Applied to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: uniphier: set system bus pinmux for PXs3

2017-08-29 15:42 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > The system bus is not enabled by default for NAND, eMMC boot > etc. of PXs3. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Series, applied to u-boot-uniphier. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] reset: uniphier: fix compatible for SD reset node for LD11/LD20

2017-08-29 12:20 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > LD20 has SD ctrl instead of MIO ctrl. LD11 has both of them. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada > --- Series, applied to u-boot-uniphier. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] Add denali DT driver

2017-08-26 1:12 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > 1/2 is required for 2/2. > Denali NAND controller has two reg regions named "nand_data" and "denali_reg" > as described by Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/denali-nand.txt > > > > Masahiro Yamada (2): > ofnode: add

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/6] ARM: uniphier: update PLL settings and clean-up NAND settings

2017-08-26 17:57 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > > 1-3: update PLL init code > 4-6: clean up NAND adhoc code (the last two are only applicable > after the Denali DT driver is applied.) > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/805959/ > Series, applied. --

Re: [U-Boot] undefined reference to `environment'

Hello, On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 17:18:24 -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > So there's something extra funny going on in the linking. See > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/806263/ which I have included, but > haven't been able to push out. At this point, I don't think it's the correct fix. I don't see why

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/23] efi_loader implement missing functions

On 08/29/2017 10:38 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > >> Am 29.08.2017 um 22:16 schrieb Simon Glass : >> >> Hi, >> >>> On 29 August 2017 at 22:16, Rob Clark wrote: On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Leif Lindholm wrote:

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] patman: add support for omitting bouncing addresses

Add support for reading a list of bouncing addresses from a in-tree file (doc/bounces) and from the ~/.patman config file. These addresses are stripped from the Cc list. Signed-off-by: Chris Packham --- This version supports an in-tree doc/bounces file as well as a

Re: [U-Boot] undefined reference to `environment'

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 04:16:39 +0800, Simon Glass wrote: > >> A bisect shows this came in with: >> >> f40ad66f (refs/bisect/bad) arch/sh: don't bring common/env_embedded.o >> into the link >>

Re: [U-Boot] undefined reference to `environment'

Hello, On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 04:16:39 +0800, Simon Glass wrote: > A bisect shows this came in with: > > f40ad66f (refs/bisect/bad) arch/sh: don't bring common/env_embedded.o > into the link > > Thomas, could you please take a look? env/embedded.o is missing in the link. It is added to extra-y

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/23] efi_loader implement missing functions

> Am 29.08.2017 um 22:16 schrieb Simon Glass : > > Hi, > >> On 29 August 2017 at 22:16, Rob Clark wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Leif Lindholm >>> wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 02:26:48PM +0200, Alexander

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/16] dtoc: Add support for 64-bit addresses

Simon, I should be able to give this a test drive on the RK3368 by the end of the week. For the RK3399 our board uses full OF_CONTROL, so I won’t really exercise this there. Given that the RK3399 can always fall back to OF_CONTROL for SPL (as is the default on Puma) and this only blocks the

[U-Boot] ** Can't read Driver Desriptor Block **

Hello Simon, U-Boot HEAD qemu-86_defconfig cannot discover an IDE disk with one FAT partition in qemu-system-x86_64. By bisection I found this patch. b7c6baef2891ce8978cbfddb66e944943473ac21 x86: Convert MMC to driver model With this patch I get IDE: Bus 0: OK Bus 1: OK Device 0: Model:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 05/16] dtoc: Add support for 32 or 64-bit addresses

> On 29 Aug 2017, at 22:15, Simon Glass wrote: > > When using 32-bit addresses dtoc works correctly. For 64-bit addresses it > does not since it ignores the #address-cells and #size-cells properties. > > Update the tool to use fdt64_t as the element type for reg properties

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/23] efi_loader implement missing functions

Hi, On 29 August 2017 at 22:16, Rob Clark wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Leif Lindholm > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 02:26:48PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> > > > I would add command >>> > > > bootefi selftest.efi >>> > > > to

Re: [U-Boot] undefined reference to `environment'

+Thomas Hi Joe, On 29 August 2017 at 06:59, Joe Hershberger wrote: > Hi Simon / Tom, > > It seems the SH4 build is failing with the current trunk. Or at least > my test build is failing and the change seems to have nothing to do > with the failure. > >

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 10/16] dtoc: Rename is_phandle() and adjust it to return more detail

Update this function to return more detail about a property that contains phandles. This will allow (in a future commit) more accurate handling of these properties. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- Changes in v2: None tools/dtoc/dtb_platdata.py | 79

Re: [U-Boot] undefined reference to `environment'

Hello, On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 04:16:39 +0800, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Joe, > > On 29 August 2017 at 06:59, Joe Hershberger wrote: > > Hi Simon / Tom, > > > > It seems the SH4 build is failing with the current trunk. Or at least > > my test build is failing and the change

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 08/16] dtoc: Use the Fdt's class's phandle map

Now that the Fdt class can map phandles to the associated nodes, use that instead of a separate implementation. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- Changes in v2: None tools/dtoc/dtb_platdata.py | 16 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 11/16] dtoc: Rename the phandle struct

Rather than naming the phandle struct according to the number of cells it uses (e.g. struct phandle_2_cell) name it according to the number of arguments it has (e.g. struct phandle_1_arg). This is a more intuitive naming. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- Changes in v2: None

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 07/16] dtoc: Update the Fdt class to record phandles

Add a map from phandles to nodes. This can be used by clients of the the class instead of maintaining this themselves. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- Changes in v2: None tools/dtoc/fdt.py | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/dtoc/fdt.py

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/16] dtoc: Make is_phandle() a member function

This function will need to have access to class members once we enhance it to support multiple phandle values. In preparation for that, move it into the class. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- Changes in v2: None tools/dtoc/dtb_platdata.py | 36

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] env: Fix operation of 'make environ'

Hi Joe, On 30 August 2017 at 04:02, Joe Hershberger wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> This was broken by the recent environment refactoring. Specifically: >> >> $ make environ >> scripts/Makefile.build:59:

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 16/16] dtoc: Add a header to the generated files

Add a header that indicates that the files generated by dtoc should not be modified. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- Changes in v2: None tools/dtoc/dtb_platdata.py | 12 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/dtoc/dtb_platdata.py

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 14/16] dtoc: Support properties containing multiple phandle values

At present dtoc has a very simplistic view of phandles. It assumes that a property has only a single phandle with a single argument (i.e. two cells per property). This is not true in many cases. Enhance the implementation to scan all phandles in a property and to use the correct number of

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, 5/5] boot: fdt: fixup the memory dt nodes falcon boot

On 08/29/2017 12:30 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:17 PM, York Sun wrote: >> On 08/26/2017 04:50 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 07:10:51PM +, York Sun wrote:

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 13/16] dtoc: Put phandle args in an array

We want to support more than one phandle argument. It makes sense to use an array for this rather than discrete struct members. Adjust the code to support this. Rename the member to 'arg' instead of 'id'. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- Changes in v2: None

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 12/16] dtoc: Put each phandle on a separate line

When writing values from properties which contain phandles, dtoc currently writes 8 phandles per line. Change this to write one phandle per line. This helps reduce line length, since phandles are generally longer and may have arguments. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- Changes

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 03/16] dtoc: Add a 64-bit type and a way to convert cells into 64 bits

When dealing with multi-cell values we need a type that can hold this value. Add this and a function to process it from a list of cell values. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich Tested-by: Philipp Tomsich

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 15/16] dtoc: Rename the auto-generated dt-structs.h file

The filename of the auto-generated file is the same as the file that includes it. Even though the form is in the generated/ subdirectory, this could be confused. Rename the generated file to something that makes it clear it is auto-generated. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 06/16] dtoc: Handle 'reg' properties with unusual sizes

At present dtoc assumes that all 'reg' properties have both an address and a size. For I2C devices we do not have this. Adjust dtoc to cope. Reported-by: Philipp Tomsich Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- Changes in v2: None

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 04/16] dtoc: Avoid very long lines in output

Large arrays can result in lines with hundreds or thousands of characters which is not very editor-friendly. To avoid this, addjust the tool to group values 8 per line. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- Changes in v2: None tools/dtoc/dtb_platdata.py | 7 ++-

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 02/16] dtoc: Adjust Node to record its parent

We need to be able to search back up the tree for #address-cells and #size-cells. Record the parent of each node to make this easier. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich Tested-by: Philipp Tomsich

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 05/16] dtoc: Add support for 32 or 64-bit addresses

When using 32-bit addresses dtoc works correctly. For 64-bit addresses it does not since it ignores the #address-cells and #size-cells properties. Update the tool to use fdt64_t as the element type for reg properties when either the address or size is larger than one cell. Use the correct value

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/16] fdt: Sync libfdt up to upstream

Add upstream changes to U-Boot: - new pylibfdt functions - fdt_setprop_placeholder() Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- Changes in v2: None lib/libfdt/fdt_rw.c | 20 --- lib/libfdt/libfdt.h | 31 +++

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/16] dtoc: Add support for 64-bit addresses

This series updates dtoc to support 64-bit addresses automatically. These appear in C code as fdt64_t arrays: struct dtd_test1 { fdt64_t reg[2]; }; static struct dtd_test1 dtv_test1 = { .reg= {0x1234, 0x5678}, }; C code can then process these address

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] env: Fix operation of 'make environ'

Hi Simon, On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > This was broken by the recent environment refactoring. Specifically: > > $ make environ > scripts/Makefile.build:59: tools/environ/Makefile: No such file or directory > make[1]: *** No rule to make target

[U-Boot] [PATCH] env: Fix operation of 'make environ'

This was broken by the recent environment refactoring. Specifically: $ make environ scripts/Makefile.build:59: tools/environ/Makefile: No such file or directory make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'tools/environ/Makefile'. Stop. make: *** [Makefile:1469: environ] Error 2 Fix this by updating

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot, 5/5] boot: fdt: fixup the memory dt nodes falcon boot

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:17 PM, York Sun wrote: > On 08/26/2017 04:50 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 07:10:51PM +, York Sun wrote: On 04/18/2017 04:57 AM, B, Ravi wrote: >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx7: Add support for USB boot mode

On 8/29/2017 7:37 AM, Eric Nelson wrote: > Hi Troy, > > On 08/28/2017 09:42 AM, Troy Kisky wrote: >> On 8/27/2017 3:04 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: >>> This adds support for USB boot mode on the i.MX7D SoC, which >>> is most useful when doing U-Boot development on this chip. >>> >>> i.e., it enables

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] net: nfs: Correct type of rpc_t->u.reply->data

On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > In rpc_t we declare data to be a uint8_t of size 2048, for a final size > of 2048. We also however declare the reply part of the union to have a > uint32_t data field of NFS_READ_SIZE (1024) for a final size of > 4096+24=4120

Re: [U-Boot] [u-boot-release] [PATCH 2/3] armv8: ls1088a: SPL size reduction

On 08/29/2017 10:36 AM, Sumit Garg wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: York Sun >> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 9:25 PM >> To: Sumit Garg ; u-boot@lists.denx.de >> Cc: Prabhakar Kushwaha ; Ruchika Gupta >> >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] spi: fsl_qspi: Add controller busy check before new spi operation

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:55 PM, Suresh Gupta wrote: > It is recommended to check either controller is free to take > new spi action. The IP_ACC and AHB_ACC bits indicates that > the controller is busy in IP or AHB mode respectively. > And the BUSY bit indicates that

Re: [U-Boot] [u-boot-release] [PATCH 2/3] armv8: ls1088a: SPL size reduction

> -Original Message- > From: York Sun > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 9:25 PM > To: Sumit Garg ; u-boot@lists.denx.de > Cc: Prabhakar Kushwaha ; Ruchika Gupta > > Subject: Re: [u-boot-release] [PATCH 2/3] armv8:

Re: [U-Boot] setup of PEX_GCLK_RATIO in E500 CPUs(P2010) missing ?

+Roy Zang to comment on PCIe clock source On 08/29/2017 10:06 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 15:43 +, York Sun wrote: >> On 08/29/2017 06:21 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >>> On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 12:47 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: As we are looking at PCI stuff ATM

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mtd/spi: Add MT35XU512ABA1G12 NOR flash support

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Yogesh Narayan Gaur wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Jagan Teki [mailto:jagannadh.t...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 4:03 PM >> To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur >> Cc:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1] imx: remove SATA boot mode for i.MX 6UL and 6ULL

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Stefano Babic wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > On 29/08/2017 18:10, Stefan Agner wrote: >> From: Stefan Agner >> >> The NXP i.MX 6UL and 6ULL do not support SATA and have no SATA >> boot mode, hence remove it from the boot device

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/23] efi_loader implement missing functions

On 08/29/2017 04:16 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Leif Lindholm > wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 02:26:48PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: >> I would add command >> bootefi selftest.efi >> to run the tests and provide the python

Re: [U-Boot] setup of PEX_GCLK_RATIO in E500 CPUs(P2010) missing ?

On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 15:43 +, York Sun wrote: > On 08/29/2017 06:21 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 12:47 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > As we are looking at PCI stuff ATM I would like to ask > > > about PEX_GCLK_RATIO in E500 CPUs. I cannot find this is setup > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] net: fix typos

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > %s/Desriptor/Descriptor/g > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt Acked-by: Joe Hershberger ___ U-Boot mailing list

[U-Boot] [PATCH] pico-imx7d: Add "how to boot with NXP 4.1 Kernel"

The NXP 4.1 kernel needs to boot with secure boot. Add information on how to enable secure boot mode. Signed-off-by: Vanessa Maegima --- board/technexion/pico-imx7d/README | 17 + 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] net: fix typos

%s/Desriptor/Descriptor/g Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt --- drivers/net/fsl_mcdmafec.c | 2 +- drivers/net/mcffec.c | 2 +- drivers/net/mvneta.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/fsl_mcdmafec.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v1] imx: remove SATA boot mode for i.MX 6UL and 6ULL

Hi Stefan, On 29/08/2017 18:10, Stefan Agner wrote: > From: Stefan Agner > > The NXP i.MX 6UL and 6ULL do not support SATA and have no SATA > boot mode, hence remove it from the boot device detecion. This > fixes a build error introduced with 3bd1642d4d50 ("imx: fix

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] disk: part: fix typo

%s/Desriptor/Descriptor/g Fix lines over 80 characters with said typo. Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt --- disk/part_mac.c | 12 +--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/disk/part_mac.c b/disk/part_mac.c index b6c082e7e1..d597dcf00a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/23] efi_loader implement missing functions

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 05:59:41PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > On 08/29/2017 02:57 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote: > > UEFI SCT is not yet open source/free software. Obviously, this is > > something Linaro has been lobbying for since day one of our > > involvement. There used to be little

Re: [U-Boot] setup of PEX_GCLK_RATIO in E500 CPUs(P2010) missing ?

On 08/29/2017 06:21 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 12:47 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >> As we are looking at PCI stuff ATM I would like to ask >> about PEX_GCLK_RATIO in E500 CPUs. I cannot find this is setup >> at all for E500 but I THINK this is required. >> >> In 83xx

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/23] efi_loader implement missing functions

On 08/29/2017 02:57 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 02:26:48PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > I would add command > bootefi selftest.efi > to run the tests and provide the python wrapper code to add it to the > test suite. I think that's a great idea,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/23] efi_loader implement missing functions

On 08/29/2017 06:06 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote: On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 05:59:41PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: On 08/29/2017 02:57 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote: UEFI SCT is not yet open source/free software. Obviously, this is something Linaro has been lobbying for since day one of our

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mtd/spi: Add MT35XU512ABA1G12 NOR flash support

> -Original Message- > From: Jagan Teki [mailto:jagannadh.t...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 4:03 PM > To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; York Sun > Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd/spi: Add MT35XU512ABA1G12 NOR flash

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: uniphier: enable Denali NAND driver for 64bit SoCs

Now the entry to the NAND driver init can be is controlled by DT; it should not hurt to compile the driver all the time. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- configs/uniphier_v8_defconfig | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git

Re: [U-Boot] [u-boot-release] [PATCH 2/3] armv8: ls1088a: SPL size reduction

On 08/29/2017 12:02 AM, Sumit Garg wrote: > Using changes in this patch we were able to reduce approx 8k > size of u-boot-spl.bin image. Following is breif description of > changes to reduce SPL size: > 1. Changes in board/freescale/ls1088a/Makefile to remove > compilation of eth.c and cpld.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH v1] imx: remove SATA boot mode for i.MX 6UL and 6ULL

From: Stefan Agner The NXP i.MX 6UL and 6ULL do not support SATA and have no SATA boot mode, hence remove it from the boot device detecion. This fixes a build error introduced with 3bd1642d4d50 ("imx: fix USB boot mode detection for i.MX 6UL and 6ULL") Fixes:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] net: nfs: Correct type of rpc_t->u.reply->data

Hi Tom, On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > In rpc_t we declare data to be a uint8_t of size 2048, for a final size > of 2048. We also however declare the reply part of the union to have a > uint32_t data field of NFS_READ_SIZE (1024) for a final size of >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx7: Add support for USB boot mode

Hi Troy, On 08/28/2017 09:42 AM, Troy Kisky wrote: On 8/27/2017 3:04 PM, Eric Nelson wrote: This adds support for USB boot mode on the i.MX7D SoC, which is most useful when doing U-Boot development on this chip. i.e., it enables you to enter the ROM boot loader's serial download protocol

Re: [U-Boot] setup of PEX_GCLK_RATIO in E500 CPUs(P2010) missing ?

On 08/29/2017 03:47 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > As we are looking at PCI stuff ATM I would like to ask > about PEX_GCLK_RATIO in E500 CPUs. I cannot find this is setup > at all for E500 but I THINK this is required. > > In 83xx one do: > get_clocks(); > /* Configure the PCIE controller core

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/23] efi_loader implement missing functions

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 02:26:48PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: >> > > > I would add command >> > > > bootefi selftest.efi >> > > > to run the tests and provide the python wrapper code to add it to the >> > > > test

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: uniphier: fix DSPLL init code for LD20 SoC

2017-08-28 21:57 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > From: Dai Okamura > > Signed-off-by: Dai Okamura > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada > --- Applied to u-boot-uniphier. Thanks.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] clk: uniphier: add System clock support

2017-08-29 1:06 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > Support system clocks for LD4, Pro4, sLD8, Pro5, PXs2/LD6b, LD11, LD20. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada > --- Applied to u-boot-uniphier. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada

Re: [U-Boot] setup of PEX_GCLK_RATIO in E500 CPUs(P2010) missing ?

On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 12:47 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > As we are looking at PCI stuff ATM I would like to ask > about PEX_GCLK_RATIO in E500 CPUs. I cannot find this is setup > at all for E500 but I THINK this is required. > > In 83xx one do: > get_clocks(); > /* Configure the PCIE

[U-Boot] [PATCH] armv8: fsl-layerscape: Fix final MMU table for QSPI and IFC

For QSPI and IFC addresses execution shouldn't be allowed when u-boot running from DDR. Revise the MMU final table to enforce execute-never bits. Signed-off-by: Suresh Gupta --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/cpu.h | 6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2

Re: [U-Boot] DA850evm SPI Flash Partitions between Linux and U-boot are Inconsistent

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:41 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On Tuesday 29 August 2017 03:29 PM, Adam Ford wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:13 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >>> Hi Adam, >>> >>> On Sunday 27 August 2017 08:31 PM, Adam Ford wrote: I was trying to enable

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] imx6: drop duplicated bss memset and board_init_r() call

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > bss section is cleared in crt0.S. board_init_r() is also > entered from crt0 code. > > Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/23] efi_loader implement missing functions

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 02:26:48PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > > I would add command > > > > bootefi selftest.efi > > > > to run the tests and provide the python wrapper code to add it to the > > > > test suite. > > > > > > I think that's a great idea, yes. > > I wonder how far we are from

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] spi: fsl_qspi: Add controller busy check before new spi operation

It is recommended to check either controller is free to take new spi action. The IP_ACC and AHB_ACC bits indicates that the controller is busy in IP or AHB mode respectively. And the BUSY bit indicates that controller is currently busy handling a transaction to an external flash device

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 05/19] arm: socfpga: Enhance FPGA program support with at least 4 byte data

On 08/29/2017 12:45 PM, tien.fong.c...@intel.com wrote: > From: Tien Fong Chee > > This patch enables FPGA program with minimum 4 byte data size. What does that mean ? Expand the description, it's inobvious > Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/23] efi_loader implement missing functions

On 08/29/2017 12:52 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: On 08/27/2017 10:10 PM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Heinrich, On 26 August 2017 at 16:51, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: This patch sequence contains all patches needed to load iPXE and use it for downloading and executing images

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/23] efi_loader implement missing functions

On 08/29/2017 02:17 PM, Rob Clark wrote: On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 08/29/2017 12:52 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: On 08/27/2017 10:10 PM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi Heinrich, On 26 August 2017 at 16:51, Heinrich Schuchardt

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 04/19] arm: socfpga: Add FPGA loadfs command support

On 08/29/2017 12:45 PM, tien.fong.c...@intel.com wrote: > From: Tien Fong Chee > > This patch enables FPGA loadfs command support to U-boot console. > > Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee But you enabled support for this in patch 1/19 ...

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/23] efi_loader implement missing functions

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > On 08/29/2017 12:52 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: >> >> On 08/27/2017 10:10 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >>> >>> Hi Heinrich, >>> >>> On 26 August 2017 at 16:51, Heinrich Schuchardt >>> wrote: This

  1   2   >