On 11/6/21 02:52, Andre Przywara wrote:
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 18:56:34 -0400
Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 09:38:50PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/5/21 20:17, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 07:37:02PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/5/21 17:12, Simon
Hi Pali,
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 5:10 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> On Friday 05 November 2021 16:36:47 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > Hi Pali,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 3:15 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday 05 November 2021 15:07:17 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > > > > > Also, I have several Kirkwood
On 7/22/21 1:30 AM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> This patchset adds Allwinner R329 support to U-Boot.
>
> First, some code refactors happen for SoCs w/o SCP/MMC2.
>
> Then the basical support for R329 come as several parts (memory map,
> clocks, pinmux, DRAM, final Kconfig option).
>
> Then, as the
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 14:10, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> After the commit 4ed37abc49c2 ("image: Remove ifdefs around
> image_setup_linux() el at"):
>
> common/image-board.c: In function ‘boot_get_kbd’:
> common/image-board.c:902:17: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘do_bdinfo’
> 902 |
Hi Andy,
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 14:10, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> Compiler is not happy:
>
> common/image-board.c: In function ‘boot_get_kbd’:
> common/image-board.c:902:17: warning: implicit declaration of function
> ‘do_bdinfo’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 902 |
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 10:53, Sean Anderson wrote:
>
> For whatever reason, usb_setup_ehci_gadget removes and probes USB device
> 0. However, not all systems have a device 0. Use the first device
> instead.
>
> The device probed should probably have something to do with the
> controller (as
Hi Alper,
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 17:05, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Alpher,
>
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 at 17:25, Alper Nebi Yasak
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've had some recent success with my gru-kevin and wanted to update you
> > on this. Long story short, I can boot from SPI flash and have the
On 7/22/21 1:30 AM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng
> ---
> arch/arm/dts/Makefile | 2 +
> arch/arm/dts/sun50i-r329-maix-iia-dock.dts | 36
> arch/arm/dts/sun50i-r329-maix-iia.dtsi | 45 +
> arch/arm/dts/sun50i-r329.dtsi |
On 7/22/21 1:30 AM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> R329 SoC has similar MMC controllers with previous Allwinner SoCs.
>
> Add support for it by adding its compatible string.
>
> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng
It really is that simple; as far as I can tell, the other checks are
covered by
On 7/22/21 1:30 AM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> Currently only a subset of clocks/resets (similar to other SoCs) are
> supported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng
Reviewed-by: Samuel Holland
> ---
> drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig| 7 +++
> drivers/clk/sunxi/Makefile | 1 +
>
On 7/22/21 1:30 AM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> As most code are ready for basic R329 support, let's add a Kconfig
> option for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng
Reviewed-by: Samuel Holland
with one minor comment below.
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig| 14 +-
>
On 7/22/21 1:30 AM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> R329 has a new DRAM controller, which looks like a combination of the
> H6/H616 MCTL_COM part and the SUNXI_DW MCTL_CTL part. This design has
> already got reused by Allwinner, and V831/V833 SoCs have similar
> memory controller.
>
> Add support for it.
On 7/22/21 1:30 AM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> Allwinner R329 SoC is the first known Allwinner SoC that has two
> possible pinmux setups for MMC0 controller.
>
> Support configuration of both setups of MMC0 and UART0 at PB4/5.
>
> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng
> ---
>
On 7/22/21 1:30 AM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> R329 has a quite different clock tree than other SoCs. It has only 4
> PLLs and its PLL-PERIPH has two post dividers, one for the normal
> PLL-PERIPH-2x output and another for a special PLL-PERIPH-800M output.
> In addition, its PLL configuration
On 7/22/21 1:30 AM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> Allwinner R329 SoC has a different memory map with previous post-H6
> SoCs.
>
> Add the memory map to a dedicated header file, fill everywhere that
> uses a hardcoded MMIO address and specify the SPL/ATF load address.
>
> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng
>
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 18:56:34 -0400
Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 09:38:50PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 11/5/21 20:17, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 07:37:02PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > > On 11/5/21 17:12, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > >
On 11/5/21 7:32 PM, Michael Walle wrote:
Am 2021-11-05 18:39, schrieb Sean Anderson:
This series ports some of the patches from fsl_esdhc to fsl_esdhc_imx.
Because these drivers share a common lineage, many of these patches
apply with minor changes. For each one, I have noted the originating
Hi Simon,
On 05/11/2021 03:02, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Amjad,
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 09:55, Amjad Ouled-Ameur
wrote:
This will allow consumers to choose a pxe label at runtime instead of
having to prompt the user. One good use-case for this, is choosing
whether or not to apply a dtbo depending
On Friday 05 November 2021 16:36:47 Tony Dinh wrote:
> Hi Pali,
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 3:15 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
> >
> > On Friday 05 November 2021 15:07:17 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > > > > Also, I have several Kirkwood boards (with various old BootROM
> > > > > versions) that I can run the kwboot
Hi Pali,
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 3:15 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> On Friday 05 November 2021 15:07:17 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > > > Also, I have several Kirkwood boards (with various old BootROM
> > > > versions) that I can run the kwboot tests on. Will keep you posted.
> > >
> > > Ok! Do you have some
Am 2021-11-05 18:39, schrieb Sean Anderson:
This series ports some of the patches from fsl_esdhc to fsl_esdhc_imx.
Because these drivers share a common lineage, many of these patches
apply with minor changes. For each one, I have noted the originating
commit in the style of linux stable
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 09:38:50PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 11/5/21 20:17, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 07:37:02PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > On 11/5/21 17:12, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 08:21, Tom Rini wrote:
>
From: Bharat Gooty
Broadcom bnxt L2 driver support. Used by the Broadcom
iproc platforms.
Signed-off-by: Bharat Gooty
Reviewed-by: Ramon Fried
Signed-off-by: Roman Bacik
---
Changes in v8:
- remove PCICFG_ME_REGISTER
Changes in v7:
- move bnxt_*.h files to drivers/net/bnxt/
- remove
Hi All,
I have been able to get the FIT Image Signature verification running on a
Raspberry Pi 4 Model B by following the documentation here:
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/doc/uImage.FIT/beaglebone_vboot.txt.
The public key, as the doc states, is stored in the Control FDT.
From: Bharat Gooty
Load NetXtreme firmware in board_init when BNXT_ETH is selected.
Signed-off-by: Bharat Gooty
Signed-off-by: Roman Bacik
---
(no changes since v4)
Changes in v4:
- remove bnxt commands
- load bnxt firmware in board_init
Changes in v3:
- remove commands set/get mac/speed
It is useful to see kwboot version in the boot log output for debugging
purposes.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
---
tools/kwboot.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/kwboot.c b/tools/kwboot.c
index 4e4d544efd3f..d22e6ea96a5c 100644
--- a/tools/kwboot.c
+++
Properly calculate and align image header size to xmodem block size.
Kirkwood v0 images do not have stored total size of header in header
structure itself like it is for v1 images. So kwbheader_size() calculates
size by traversing image structure itself. Aligning is done in kwboot by
putting zero
This will reduce the size of the configs directory, and
make it more clear which board directory uses the defconfig
file.
Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky
---
scripts/kconfig/Makefile | 9 -
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/Makefile
On Friday 05 November 2021 15:07:17 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > > Also, I have several Kirkwood boards (with various old BootROM
> > > versions) that I can run the kwboot tests on. Will keep you posted.
> >
> > Ok! Do you have some Kirkwood board with PCIe slot? If yes, I would like
> > to see dumps from
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 3:04 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> On Friday 05 November 2021 22:09:47 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Friday 05 November 2021 12:54:24 Roman Bacik wrote:
> > > > > + pci_read_word16(bp->pdev,
> > > > > + PCI_SUBSYSTEM_VENDOR_ID,
> > > > > +
Hi Pali,
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:39 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> On Friday 05 November 2021 14:25:14 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > Hi Pali,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 3:19 AM Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday 05 November 2021 09:38:28 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > Hello!
> > > >
> > > > On
On Friday 05 November 2021 22:09:47 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 05 November 2021 12:54:24 Roman Bacik wrote:
> > > > + pci_read_word16(bp->pdev,
> > > > + PCI_SUBSYSTEM_VENDOR_ID,
> > > > + >subsystem_vendor);
> > > > +
On Friday 05 November 2021 14:41:44 Roman Bacik wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:29 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
> >
> > On Friday 05 November 2021 14:19:46 Roman Bacik wrote:
> > > Hi Pali,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:09 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Friday 05 November 2021 12:54:24
On 11/5/21 9:43 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 10/21/21 06:52, Samuel Holland wrote:
>> This, along with gpio_flags_xlate(), allows the GPIO driver to handle
>> pull-up/down flags provided by consumer drivers or in the device tree.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland
>> Reviewed-by: Simon
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:29 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> On Friday 05 November 2021 14:19:46 Roman Bacik wrote:
> > Hi Pali,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:09 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday 05 November 2021 12:54:24 Roman Bacik wrote:
> > > > > > + pci_read_word16(bp->pdev,
> > > > > >
Hello!
On Friday 05 November 2021 14:25:14 Tony Dinh wrote:
> Hi Pali,
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 3:19 AM Pali Rohár wrote:
> >
> > On Friday 05 November 2021 09:38:28 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > On Thursday 04 November 2021 23:27:32 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > > > Hi Marek and Pali,
>
On Friday 05 November 2021 14:19:46 Roman Bacik wrote:
> Hi Pali,
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:09 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
> >
> > On Friday 05 November 2021 12:54:24 Roman Bacik wrote:
> > > > > + pci_read_word16(bp->pdev,
> > > > > + PCI_SUBSYSTEM_VENDOR_ID,
> > > > > +
Hi Pali,
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 3:19 AM Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> On Friday 05 November 2021 09:38:28 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > On Thursday 04 November 2021 23:27:32 Tony Dinh wrote:
> > > Hi Marek and Pali,
> > >
> > > First off all, thanks for your hughe work on this. I have a few
Hi Pali,
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 2:09 PM Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> On Friday 05 November 2021 12:54:24 Roman Bacik wrote:
> > > > + pci_read_word16(bp->pdev,
> > > > + PCI_SUBSYSTEM_VENDOR_ID,
> > > > + >subsystem_vendor);
> > > > + pci_read_word16(bp->pdev,
Hello Michal,
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 1:45 PM Michal Simek wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/2/21 14:49, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote:
> >
> > This patchset introduces support for the authenticated FPGA images
> > on ZynqMP boards, besides that introducing common way to pass the
> > compatible property to any fpga
On Friday 05 November 2021 12:54:24 Roman Bacik wrote:
> > > + pci_read_word16(bp->pdev,
> > > + PCI_SUBSYSTEM_VENDOR_ID,
> > > + >subsystem_vendor);
> > > + pci_read_word16(bp->pdev, PCI_SUBSYSTEM_ID,
> > >subsystem_device);
> > > + pci_read_word16(bp->pdev,
From: Bharat Gooty
Load NetXtreme firmware in board_init when BNXT_ETH is selected.
Signed-off-by: Bharat Gooty
Signed-off-by: Roman Bacik
---
(no changes since v4)
Changes in v4:
- remove bnxt commands
- load bnxt firmware in board_init
Changes in v3:
- remove commands set/get mac/speed
On 11/5/21 20:17, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 07:37:02PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 11/5/21 17:12, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 08:21, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 12:14:47PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi Andre,
Added Tom to Cc.
On
Compiler is not happy:
common/image-board.c: In function ‘boot_get_kbd’:
common/image-board.c:902:17: warning: implicit declaration of function
‘do_bdinfo’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
902 | do_bdinfo(NULL, 0, 0, NULL);
| ^
Move the forward
After the commit 4ed37abc49c2 ("image: Remove ifdefs around
image_setup_linux() el at"):
common/image-board.c: In function ‘boot_get_kbd’:
common/image-board.c:902:17: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘do_bdinfo’
902 | do_bdinfo(NULL, 0, 0, NULL);
| ^
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 04:47:31PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Friday 05 November 2021 11:20:01 Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 04:16:46PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > So now I have a question: Do we want to support booting zImage with
> > > appended DTB in U-Boot when ATAGs
Hi Pali,
> -Original Message-
> From: Pali Rohár
> Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2021 4:14 PM
> To: Roman Bacik
> Cc: U-Boot Mailing List ; Bharat Gooty
> ; Joe Hershberger
> ; Ramon Fried
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] net: brcm: netXtreme driver
>
> Hello! See inline comments below.
>
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 11:03:57PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> This converts the following to Kconfig:
>CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F
>CONFIG_BOARD_LATE_INIT
>CONFIG_DISPLAY_BOARDINFO
>CONFIG_DISPLAY_BOARDINFO_LATE
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
--
Tom
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 11:03:56PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> This converts the following to Kconfig:
>CONFIG_SPL_DRIVERS_MISC
>CONFIG_SPL_ENV_SUPPORT
>CONFIG_SPL_GPIO
>CONFIG_SPL_I2C
>CONFIG_SPL_LDSCRIPT
>CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT
>CONFIG_SPL_LIBGENERIC_SUPPORT
>
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 11:03:55PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> This converts the following to Kconfig:
>CONFIG_BMP_16BPP
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 11:03:54PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> This converts the following to Kconfig:
>CONFIG_OF_EMBED
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini
> Reviewed-by: Rick Chen
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 11:03:53PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> This converts the following to Kconfig:
> CONFIG_MCFUART
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 11:03:52PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> This converts the following to Kconfig:
> CONFIG_FEC_MXC
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 11:03:51PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> This converts the following to Kconfig:
> CONFIG_SUPPORT_EMMC_BOOT
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 11:03:50PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> This converts the following to Kconfig:
> CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 11:03:49PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> This converts the following to Kconfig:
> CONFIG_SYS_HZ
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 11:03:48PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> When building a system that has both TPL and SPL_OS_BOOT, code which
> tests for CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT will be built and enabled in TPL, which is
> not correct. While there is no CONFIG_TPL_OS_BOOT symbol at this time
> (and likely will
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 09:10:14PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> For the symbols which are both hard-coded as enabled and used, move to
> Kconfig. The rest of the CONFIG_YAFFS namespace is unselected anywhere,
> so we leave it as is.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
Hi Andre,
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 11:07, Andre Przywara wrote:
>
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 10:12:11 -0600
> Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 08:21, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 12:14:47PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > > > Hi Andre,
> > > >
> > > > Added
On 05/11/2021 19:03, Alistair Delva wrote:
> Hi Yifeng,
>
> Since "mmc: rockchip_sdhci: add phy and clock config for rk3399", my
> RockPi 4b device can't boot off of eMMC. It will start tpl/spl and
> then fail:
>
> U-Boot TPL 2021.10-rc1-gac804143cf-dirty (Aug 11 2021 - 10:02:07)
> Channel 0:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 07:37:02PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 11/5/21 17:12, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 08:21, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 12:14:47PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > > > Hi Andre,
> > > >
> > > > Added Tom to Cc.
TPM drivers have currently no maintainers. Add myself since I contributed
the TIS implementation.
Reviewed-by: Heinrich Schuchardt
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
---
MAINTAINERS | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index
Convert our SPI TPM driver and use the newly added API
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
---
drivers/tpm/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/tpm/tpm2_tis_spi.c | 447 +++--
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 417 deletions(-)
diff --git
A previous patch added support for an mmio based TPM.
Add an example in QEMU on it's usage
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
---
doc/board/emulation/qemu-arm.rst | 25 +
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git
A previous commit is adding an MMIO TPMv2 driver. Include in the default
qemu arm configs, since we plan on using them on EFI testing
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass
Signed-off-by: Ilias Apalodimas
---
configs/qemu_arm64_defconfig | 2 ++
configs/qemu_arm_defconfig | 2 ++
2 files changed, 4
Add support for devices that expose a TPMv2 though MMIO.
Apart from those devices, we can use the driver in our QEMU setups and
test TPM related code which is difficult to achieve using the sandbox
driver (e.g test the EFI TCG2 protocol).
It's worth noting that a previous patch added TPMv2 TIS
There's a lot of code duplication in U-Boot right now. All the TPM TIS
compatible drivers we have at the moment have their own copy of a TIS
implementation.
So let's create a common layer which implements the core TIS functions.
Any driver added from now own, which is compatible with the TIS
Hi!
This is the update for [1].
Changes since v4:
- renamed struct udevice *udev -> struct udevice *dev
- added comments on struct tpm_tis_phy_ops
- removed duplicate defines from tpm2_tis_spi driver (now in tpm_tis.h)
- moved API function description for the .c to the .h file
- added
On 11/5/21 17:12, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 08:21, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 12:14:47PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi Andre,
Added Tom to Cc.
On 05.11.21 11:04, Andre Przywara wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 20:02:41 -0600
Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 4
The Sunxi boards only support a 16 second watchdog timeout. This is too
short to boot Linux. The UEFI specification requires 300 seconds as
default timeout.
Change the default for CONFIG_WATCHDOG_AUTOSTART for ARCH_SUNXI.
Fixes: b147bd3607f8 ("sunxi: Enable watchdog timer support by default")
On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 10:47 PM wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 6/22/21 8:21 AM, chao zeng wrote:
> > From: Chao Zeng
> >
> > When operating the write-protection flash,spi_flash_std_write() and
> > spi_flash_std_erase() would return wrong result.The flash is protected,
> > but write or erase the flash
From: Michael Walle
[ fsl_esdhc commit 52faec31827ec1a1837977e29c067424426634c5 ]
Make the code cleaner and drop the old-style #ifdef constructs where it is
possible.
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson
---
drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc_imx.c | 209
From: Michael Walle
[ fsl_esdhc commit 7e48a028a42c111ba38a90b86e5f57dace980fa0 ]
First, we need the waterlevel setting for PIO mode only. Secondy, both DMA
setup code is identical for both directions, except for the data pointer.
Thus, unify them.
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle
Signed-off-by:
From: Yangbo Lu
[ fsl_esdhc commit 263ddfc3454ead3a988adef39b962479adce2b28 ]
The initial clock setting should be through sysctl register only,
while the mmc_set_clock() will call mmc_set_ios() introduce other
configurations like bus width, mode, and so on.
Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu
From: Michael Walle
[ fsl_esdhc commit b1ba1460a445bcc67972a617625d0349e4f22b31 ]
Use the dma_{map,unmap}_single() calls. These will take care of the
flushing and invalidation of caches.
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson
---
drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc_imx.c | 50
[ fsl_esdhc commit 30f6444d024a74ee48aa6969c1531aecd3c59deb ]
Fix mmc->clock with actual clock which is divided by the
controller, and record it with priv->clock.
Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson
---
drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc_imx.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff
From: Michael Walle
[ fsl_esdhc commit da86e8cfcb03ed5c1d8e0718bc8bc8583e60ced8 ]
SDMA can only do DMA with 32 bit addresses. This is true for all
architectures (just doesn't apply to 32 bit ones). Simplify the code and
remove unnecessary CONFIG_FSL_LAYERSCAPE.
Also make the error message more
From: Yangbo Lu
[ fsl_esdhc commit commit 08197cb8dff7cd097ab07a325093043c39d19bbd ]
Drop redundant code for non-removable feature. "non-removable" property
has been read in mmc_of_parse().
Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson
---
drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc_imx.c | 28
[ fsl_esdhc commit 07bae1de382723b94244096953b05225572728cd ]
This patch is to clean up bus width setting code.
- For DM_MMC, remove getting "bus-width" from device tree.
This has been done in mmc_of_parse().
- For non-DM_MMC, move bus width configuration from fsl_esdhc_init()
to
[ fsl_esdhc commit 5b05fc0310cd933acf76ee661577c6b07a95e684 ]
Voltage validation should be done by CMD8. Current comparison between
mmc_cfg voltages and host voltage capabilities is meaningless.
So drop current comparison and let voltage validation is through CMD8.
Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu
[ fsl_esdhc commit 2913926f3b3dec282f8773e3c02377c9600d8267 ]
Remove redundant DM_MMC checking which is already in DM_MMC conditional
compile block.
Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson
---
drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc_imx.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
[ fsl_esdhc commit 41dec2fe99512e941261594f522b2e7d485c314b ]
U-boot prefers DM_MMC + BLK for MMC. Now eSDHC driver has already
support it, so let's force to use it.
- Drop non-BLK support for DM_MMC introduced by below patch.
66fa035 mmc: fsl_esdhc: fix probe issue without CONFIG_BLK enabled
This series ports some of the patches from fsl_esdhc to fsl_esdhc_imx.
Because these drivers share a common lineage, many of these patches
apply with minor changes. For each one, I have noted the originating
commit in the style of linux stable backports.
In fa33d20749 ("mmc: split fsl_esdhc
) to signal Hi François,
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 10:31, François Ozog wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> Le ven. 5 nov. 2021 à 17:12, Simon Glass a écrit :
>>
>> Hi François,
>>
>> On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 02:27, François Ozog wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 03:02, Simon Glass wrote:
>> >>
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 10:12:11 -0600
Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 08:21, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 12:14:47PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > > Hi Andre,
> > >
> > > Added Tom to Cc.
> > >
> > > On 05.11.21 11:04, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 4
For whatever reason, usb_setup_ehci_gadget removes and probes USB device
0. However, not all systems have a device 0. Use the first device
instead.
The device probed should probably have something to do with the
controller (as specified by e.g. ums or fastboot
). In fact, I find it odd that we
Hi Simon,
Le ven. 5 nov. 2021 à 17:12, Simon Glass a écrit :
> Hi François,
>
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 02:27, François Ozog
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 03:02, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi François,
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 10:03, François Ozog
> wrote:
> >> >
> >>
Hi Ilias,
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 02:23, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 10:17:21AM +0200, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > + u8 *result)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct tpm_tis_chip_data *drv_data = (void
> > > >
Hi Marek,
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 05:24, Marek Behún wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 20:02:29 -0600
> Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > Better to make iter a struct sysinfo_str_list_iter, I think and
> > require the caller to declare it:
> >
> > sysinfo_str_list_iter iter;
> > char str[80]'
> >
> > p =
Hi François,
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 02:27, François Ozog wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 03:02, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi François,
>>
>> On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 10:03, François Ozog wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Simon,
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 15:59, Simon Glass wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi
Hi Takahiro,
On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 21:24, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 08:02:37PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Takahiro,
> >
> > On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 19:21, AKASHI Takahiro
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 08:49:04PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi
Hi Heiko,
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 01:50, Heiko Thiery wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> Am Fr., 5. Nov. 2021 um 03:02 Uhr schrieb Simon Glass :
> >
> > Hi Heiko,
> >
> > On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 12:53, Heiko Thiery wrote:
> > >
> > > In case mkimage exits with a return code other than zero do not stop.
> > >
Hi Takahiro,
On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 21:15, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 09:11:51AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Takahiro,
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 19:49, AKASHI Takahiro
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 08:57:48AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi
Hi Takahiro,
On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 20:49, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2021 at 08:02:05PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 01:43, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/1/21 03:14, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > Hi Takahiro,
> > > >
> >
Hi Marek,
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 05:20, Marek Behún wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 20:02:27 -0600
> Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 17:23, Marek Behún wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Marek Behún
> > >
> > > Add get_str_list() method to sysinfo operations.
> > >
> > > The get_str_list()
Hi Ilias,
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 01:02, Ilias Apalodimas
wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> [...]
> > >
> > > +int tpm_tis_open(struct udevice *udev);
> >
> > Please add comments
>
> There are comments for all of those in drivers/tpm/tpm2_tis_core.c,
> isn't that enough?
So just move them to the header
Hi Marek,
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 05:19, Marek Behún wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 20:02:25 -0600
> Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 17:23, Marek Behún wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Marek Behún
> > >
> > > Currently sysinfo_get_str() returns 0 if a string is filled in
Hi,
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 07:04, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
> On 05.11.21 13:42, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > On 05.11.21 11:28, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> >> On 05/11/2021 11.16, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> in order to use CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE and also
> >>> CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE, a public
Hi,
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 08:21, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 12:14:47PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > Hi Andre,
> >
> > Added Tom to Cc.
> >
> > On 05.11.21 11:04, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > > On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 20:02:41 -0600
> > > Simon Glass wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
On 10/21/21 06:52, Samuel Holland wrote:
Now that the sunxi_gpio driver handles pull-up/down via the driver
model, pin configuration does not need a platform-specific function.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland
I tested on an OrangePi PC (orangepi_pc_defconfig). The 'mmc rescan'
command detects
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
