[U-Boot] Compilation erros while trying at compile ARM DaVinci

2009-08-10 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
I get the following compilation errors when I try to compile DaVinci DM355 on the latest U-Boot source. I thought I saw similar issues on the mailing list some time back. Have these been resolved? 3.2/libgcc.a(_udivsi3.o) has EABI version 5, but target u-boot has EABI version 0

Re: [U-Boot] Compilation erros while trying at compile ARM DaVinci

2009-08-10 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
-Original Message- From: Eric Bénard [mailto:e...@eukrea.com] Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 11:26 AM To: Paulraj, Sandeep Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Compilation erros while trying at compile ARM DaVinci Hi, aulraj, Sandeep a écrit : I get the following

[U-Boot] Support for NANDs greater than/equal to 4 GB

2009-08-11 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Scott, There was a patch some time which added the 64 bit support in the MTD subsystem. I am referring to the patch below http://git.infradead.org/mtd-2.6.git/blobdiff/8a4c2495b142fe612b291a810d9e695f269c26db..69423d99fc182a81f3c5db3eb5c140acc6fc64be:/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c This feature

Re: [U-Boot] Support for NANDs greater than/equal to 4 GB

2009-08-12 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Scott, Please see inline -Original Message- From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:10 AM To: Paulraj, Sandeep Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: Support for NANDs greater than/equal to 4 GB On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 09:02:44AM -0500

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] MTD:NAND: ADD new ECC mode NAND_ECC_HW_OOB_FIRST

2009-08-12 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
-Original Message- From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 6:35 PM To: Paulraj, Sandeep Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Narnakaje, Snehaprabha Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] MTD:NAND: ADD new ECC mode NAND_ECC_HW_OOB_FIRST On Mon, Aug 10

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] NAND: DaVinci: Adding 4 BIT ECC support

2009-08-18 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
+static void nand_davinci_4bit_enable_hwecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int mode) +{ + u32 val; + + switch (mode) { + case NAND_ECC_WRITE: + case NAND_ECC_READ: + /* +* Start a new ECC calculation for reading or writing 512 bytes +* of

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] NAND: DaVinci: Adding 4 BIT ECC support

2009-08-18 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
-Original Message- From: Scott Wood [mailto:scottw...@freescale.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 11:12 AM To: Paulraj, Sandeep Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] NAND: DaVinci: Adding 4 BIT ECC support On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 08:56:03AM -0500, Paulraj

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: DaVinci: DaVinci DM365 SOC specific code

2009-08-18 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
, Sandeep From: John Rigby [mailto:jcri...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 11:21 AM To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Cc: Paulraj, Sandeep; u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: DaVinci: DaVinci DM365 SOC specific code I don't see a next

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] NAND: DaVinci: Adding 4 BIT ECC support

2009-08-18 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Jean-Christophe has acked this one - see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/65792/focus=6614 He said he'll ACK if this patch is ACK'ed. He has not acked yet. But I'm concerned about direct register accesses. We really should insist on using proper accessor calls. I'll

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-06 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
for the various SOC's with me i could help in maintaining the repository. Lets hope this split is OK with the others as well. Thanks, Sandeep From: Tom [tom@windriver.com] Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 9:54 AM To: Paulraj, Sandeep Cc: Dirk Behme; Wolfgang Denk

Re: [U-Boot] All rights reserved in drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c

2009-09-08 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
I don't think we received a patch. How are we moving forward as this is required for the NAND driver to work. Thanks, Sandeep Hi Guido, A while back you added nand_util.c to U-Boot, with a copyright statement of Copyright (C) 2006 by Weiss-Electronic GmbH. All rights reserved. At

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI DaVinci: Remove references to SZ_xx

2009-09-08 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
-Original Message- From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de] Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 2:51 PM To: Paulraj, Sandeep Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI DaVinci: Remove references to SZ_xx Dear s-paul...@ti.com, In message 1252434246-19517-1-git

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI DaVinci: Remove references to SZ_xx

2009-09-08 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Wolfgang, Now how do I handle this? Should I make a next branch and push this patch to the next branch or push it directly to the master. Assuming this was done intentionally: [Sandeep] Yes this was intentional because for NANDs with large block sizes(256 KiB), if this is not increased we

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI DaVinci: Remove references to SZ_xx

2009-09-08 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
: jcw...@gmail.com [mailto:jcw...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of J.C. Wren Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 3:15 PM To: Tom Cc: Paulraj, Sandeep; u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI DaVinci: Remove references to SZ_xx Why is this change being made at all? Seems a lot more awkward

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI DaVinci: Remove references to SZ_xx

2009-09-08 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
] On Behalf Of J.C. Wren Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 3:28 PM To: Paulraj, Sandeep Cc: Tom; u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI DaVinci: Remove references to SZ_xx I saw this comment: Also i gather from e-mails on the list that Wolfgang does not like these references

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] TI DaVinci: DM355: Config Cleanup and Update

2009-09-08 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
I will send it. And besides that will be against the u-boot-nand-flash GIT Thanks, Sandeep From: John Rigby [jcri...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 8:07 PM To: Paulraj, Sandeep Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] TI

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm_cortexa8: support cache flush to other soc

2009-09-10 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
OK. Will do -Original Message- From: Tom [mailto:tom@windriver.com] Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 3:02 PM To: Paulraj, Sandeep Cc: Dirk Behme; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Minkyu Kang Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm_cortexa8: support cache flush to other soc Sandeep, Can

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI DaVinci: DM6446: Fix Compilation error in NAND mode

2009-09-10 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com The Default mode that is built for the Davinci DVEVM happens to be the NOR mode. When we want to build for the NAND mode, we get a compilation error. This is overcome by defining the CONFIG_MTD_DEVICE flag in the NAND mode. The image built for NAND

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3 Move cache routines to cache.S

2009-09-10 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
v7_flush_dcache_all, because it depends on omap ROM code is not generic. Rename the function to 'invalidate_dcache' and move it to the omap cpu directory. Collect the other omap cache routines l2_cache_enable and l2_cache_disable with invalide_dcache into cache.S. This means removing

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI DaVinci: DM646x: Initial Support for DM646x SOC

2009-09-11 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com DM646x is an SOC from TI which has both an ARM and a DSP. There are multiple variants of the SOC mainly dealing with different core speeds. This patch adds the initial framework for the DM646x SOC. Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com

Re: [U-Boot] All rights reserved in drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c

2009-09-11 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: I don't think we received a patch. How are we moving forward as this is required for the NAND driver to work. I guess we start rewriting it 1) What about all the necessary hooks to other parts of the NAND driver. 2) What about all the very valid commits

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: OMAP3: Overo Tobi ethernet support

2009-09-12 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Olof Johansson wrote: Add setup for ethernet on Tobi, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be loaded over tftp. Based on the omap3 evm code. I added a new highlevel define for Tobi to avoid having it dependent on CMD_NET (which would seem backward in this case). Signed-off-by: Olof

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: OMAP3: Overo Tobi ethernet support

2009-09-12 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Olof Johansson wrote: Add setup for ethernet on Tobi, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be loaded over tftp. Based on the omap3 evm code. I added a new highlevel define for Tobi to avoid having it dependent on CMD_NET (which would seem backward in this case). Signed-off-by: Olof

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: OMAP3: Overo Tobi ethernet support

2009-09-13 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
I always use 'git am -s', which adds the SOB. My understanding is that maintainers should do this as an indication of approval and help in traceability. regards, Ben OK Thanks. Shall do so henceforth. Regards, Sandeep ___ U-Boot mailing

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3 Overo: Fix ethernet related warnings

2009-09-14 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Fix warning 'setup_net_chip' declared 'static' but never defined with CONFIG_OMAP3_OVERO_TOBI disabled and implicit declaration of function 'smc911x_initialize' with CONFIG_OMAP3_OVERO_TOBI enabled. Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com Pushed to u-boot-ti

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: DaVinci DM365: Enabling net support on DM365

2009-09-14 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
-Original Message- From: Matt Waddel [mailto:mwad...@control4.com] Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 5:43 PM To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Paulraj, Sandeep Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: DaVinci DM365: Enabling net support on DM365 Hi Sandeep, Is there another part

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3 MMC: Fix warning dereferencing type-punned pointer

2009-09-14 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
-Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Dirk Behme Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 4:40 AM To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3 MMC: Fix warning dereferencing type-punned pointer Fix warning

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: DaVinci: Adding GIO addresses to header file

2009-09-15 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com This patch adds GIO definitions to the hardware.h header file Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com --- include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/hardware.h | 23 +++ 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Pushed

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI DaVinci DM365: Removing header file which does not exist

2009-09-15 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com The DaVinci DM365 EVM board specific code was including a header file which does not exist. So removing this header file. Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com --- board/davinci/dm365evm/dm365evm.c |1 - 1 files changed, 0

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: DaVinci DM365: Minor config cleanup

2009-09-15 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com The DM365 config was using the 'CONFIG_CMD_SAVEENV' flag. This is already included when we include the config_cmd_default.h header file. So this flag is removed. Also another flag to enable NAND functions was being enabled incorrectly.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3 MMC: Fix warning dereferencing type-punned pointer

2009-09-15 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Fix warning dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com --- Patch against recent u-boot-ti git f4f92c81835ccc43f74925737dfd478edb0182f2 TI: OMAP3: Overo Tobi ethernet support Compile tested only

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: DaVinci: DM355 Leopard board support

2009-09-18 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com This patch adds support for the leopard board which is based on the DM355 SOC. Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com --- Makefile |3 + board/davinci/dm355leopard/Makefile | 52 +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: DaVinci DM365: Enabling net support on DM365

2009-09-18 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com This patch enables EMAC on the DM365 EVM. Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com --- board/davinci/dm365evm/dm365evm.c | 38 + 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Pushed to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] ARM:OMAP3:SDP3430: initial support

2009-09-19 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
--- MAINTAINERS |1 + MAKEALL |1 + Makefile|3 + board/ti/sdp3430/Makefile | 49 ++ board/ti/sdp3430/config.mk | 33 board/ti/sdp3430/sdp.c | 194 ++ board/ti/sdp3430/sdp.h

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: DaVinci: DM646x: Update flag used to represent DM646x SOC's

2009-09-21 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
s-paul...@ti.com wrote: From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com In the DaVinci specific code, we use both CONFIG_SOC_DM646X and CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to represent DM646x specific code. This patch changes occurrences of CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to CONFIG_SOC_DM646X. This is because for DM644x

[U-Boot] patches added to u-boot-ti

2010-11-04 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
I have added quite a few patches to u-boot-ti but MAKEALL returns several errors. I think most boards have not been updated since the ARM relocation patch. I believe the rule is that support for boards that are not compiling will be kept in mainline till the next release. After that we will

Re: [U-Boot] patches added to u-boot-ti

2010-11-04 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Paulraj, Sandeep s-paul...@ti.com wrote: I have added quite a few patches to u-boot-ti but MAKEALL returns several errors. I think most boards have not been updated since the ARM relocation patch. I believe the rule is that support for boards

Re: [U-Boot] patches added to u-boot-ti

2010-11-05 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Paulraj, Sandeep s-paul...@ti.com wrote: I have added quite a few patches to u-boot-ti but MAKEALL returns several errors. I think most boards have not been updated since the ARM relocation patch. Just sent patches to fix up OMAP3 pandora, Thanks, I

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/3] OMAP3: pandora: remove unused config macros

2010-11-05 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Pandora's config has various flash related macros that are either not referenced anywhere in the code or are used by drivers that are not enabled. Remove them. Signed-off-by: Grazvydas Ignotas nota...@gmail.com --- Alternatively this old patch can be applied to clean up more OMAP

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] Custodian changes, using Patchwork

2010-11-13 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/ The setup has just been activated; I will try to arrange to have some more history added, but I don;t want to promise that this will work, or when this will happen. For now, I would like to ask all CUSTODIANS to register as

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] da830: fixup ARM relocation support

2010-11-19 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Fixes build breakage in da830evm after commit 97003756249bd790910417eb66f0039bbf06a02c da8xx: fixup ARM relocation support The da8xx fixup commit changed da830/da850 common code to make relocation work in da850, but didn't add the required defines to da830evm_config.h resulting in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] omap4: board: change global data pointer to file scope

2010-11-19 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR is currently defined within the scope of function while it is a global pointer. Change the scope of definition to replicate it's global scope. This seems to help gcc 4.5 optimizations as well. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] mmc: omap: timeout counter fix

2010-11-19 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Having a loop with a counter is no timing guarentee for timing accuracy or compiler optimizations. For e.g. the same loop counter which runs when the MPU is running at 600MHz will timeout in around half the time when running at 1GHz. or the example where GCC 4.5 compiles with different

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] Pandora config fixes and updates

2010-11-19 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
These patches update pandora's config for relocations and memory layout changes. They also sync the config with one shipped on production units. Please apply at least the first patch for v2010.12 so that we have pandora buildable. Patches generated on top of u-boot-ti, also applies on

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP4: Panda: Disable CMD_NFS

2010-11-19 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
This patch fixes the Panda build after commit 6d8962e814c15807dd6ac5757904be2a02d187b8 by explicitly disabling CMD_NFS From the commit message for Switch from archive libraries to partial linking: This commit reveals board configurations that exclude some features but include source

Re: [U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH 1/2] TI: DaVinci DA850 EVM: add information regarding DA850 in README.davinci

2010-11-19 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
The README.davinci in documentation folder is missing information regarding DA850 which is a supported DaVinci device. Add this information. Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com --- Pushed to u-boot-ti --Sandeep ___ U-Boot mailing

Re: [U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH v4 2/2] TI: DaVinci DA850 EVM: support passing maximum allowed cpu clock rate information to kernel

2010-11-19 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
The TI DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18x EVM can be populated with devices having different maximum allowed CPU clock rating. The maximum clock the chip can support can only be determined from the label on the package (not software readable). Introduce a method to pass the maximum allowed clock

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] omap4: board: change global data pointer to file scope

2010-11-19 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Dear Sandeep, In message 0554bef07d437848af01b9c9b5f0bc5dbd1c0...@dlee01.ent.ti.com you wrote: Pushed to u-boot-ti In this case it would make sense to set the state of this patch in Patchwork to Awaiting Upstream. Thanks. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk Wolfgang, I am working

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] DaVinci: remove bogus DEF_BOOTM definition

2010-11-19 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Some boar config files defined DEF_BOOTM but this was not used anywhere in the code. Remove this bogus define. Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de Cc: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com --- Wolfgang, Pushed to u-boot-ti/master My pull request in the morning did not have this

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/3] OMAP3: pandora: remove unused config macros

2010-11-19 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Paulraj, Sandeep s-paul...@ti.com wrote: Pandora's config has various flash related macros that are either not referenced anywhere in the code or are used by drivers that are not enabled. Remove them. Signed-off-by: Grazvydas Ignotas nota

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] DaVinci: remove bogus DEF_BOOTM definition

2010-11-19 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Dear Sandeep, In message 0554bef07d437848af01b9c9b5f0bc5dbd1c1...@dlee01.ent.ti.com you wrote: Pushed to u-boot-ti/master My pull request in the morning did not have this patch. Can you pull this one too? I can send in an updated pull request. Thanks. There is no need for a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/3] OMAP3: pandora: remove unused config macros

2010-11-19 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Dear Sandeep, In message aanlktikymeerp9jxss71+4uv+wd38zrkqcsv5bgk2...@mail.gmail.com Grazvydas Ignotas wrote: This does not apply. This is probably because I added your other patches Yeah this this was supposed to be applied instead of OMAP3: pandora: remove unused config

[U-Boot] OMAP3 patch to improve performance?

2010-11-19 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
I came across this patch that might be useful http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067534.html In any case since the u-boot structure has changed this cannot be applied. If anybody is interested please send a new patch. Regards, Sandeep

Re: [U-Boot] OMAP3 patch to improve performance?

2010-11-19 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Dear Sandeep, In message 0554bef07d437848af01b9c9b5f0bc5dbd1c1...@dlee01.ent.ti.com you wrote: I came across this patch that might be useful http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067534.html In any case since the u-boot structure has changed this cannot be

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/2] Davinci 8xx: Move common functions to share code

2010-11-22 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg32375.html Sadly that patch never made it to the mainline It seems to me the only reason the patch did not go to the mainline was to understand who should merge it and then push to Wolfgang. Usually I take small changes to the other

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2][NEXT] Davinci 8xx: Move common functions to share code

2010-11-23 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
On 11/23/2010 05:55 PM, sughosh ganu wrote: Hi, Tested on hawkboard with u-boot and nand_spl images built from Ben's tree. Tested-by: Sughosh Ganu urwithsugh...@gmail.com mailto:urwithsugh...@gmail.com I guess i will have to send an updated version from Ben's tree, as he

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2][NEXT] Davinci 8xx: Move common functions to share code

2010-11-23 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Hi Sandeep, On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Paulraj, Sandeep s-paul...@ti.com wrote: I have been tracking this e-mail chain for some time now and I have lost track of which patches to apply in which order. Can someone please give me the correct order and the correct version

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2][NEXT] Davinci 8xx: Move common functions to share code

2010-11-23 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Hi Sandeep, On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Paulraj, Sandeep s-paul...@ti.com wrote: I have been tracking this e-mail chain for some time now and I have lost track of which patches to apply in which order. Can someone please give me the correct order and the correct

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2][NEXT] Davinci 8xx: Move common functions to share code

2010-11-23 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Paulraj, Sandeep s-paul...@ti.com wrote: I am able to clone the tree but I am unable to access it on the web I'm very sorry for the trouble you've had accessing that repo -- I will happily switch to any other public git hosting service of your choosing

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3: add CM-T35 board

2010-11-25 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Mike Rapoport wrote, on 11/23/2010 01:29 AM: minor comments follow: [...] diff --git a/board/cm_t35/cm_t35.h b/board/cm_t35/cm_t35.h new file mode 100644 index 000..514017d --- /dev/null +++ b/board/cm_t35/cm_t35.h [..] /*DSS_DATA22*/\ + MUX_VAL(CP(DSS_DATA23),

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-arm

2010-11-27 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Wolfgang, should I send out a (single) mail to each ARM board maintainer right after this cycle asking them to either fix their board or say that they are not going to? This could help weed out during next cycle. IIRC if by the next release cycle, the errors are not fixed, the boards

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-arm

2010-11-27 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
I have hardware for igep0020, beagle, overo, panda, and sdp4430. I build daily for these machines and submit patches when they break (there is a patch pending for omap4430 that fixes the build for it). Which patch? Can you give me the link?

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] DaVinci DM355: Fix for ARM Relocation support

2010-11-27 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com Fix for ARM Relocation support Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com --- include/configs/davinci_dm355evm.h |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/davinci_dm355evm.h

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Devkit8000: Fix build after introduction of GENERATED_GBL_DATA_SIZE

2010-11-28 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Applied, thanks. Sandeep - hope this is OK with your. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk no problem. I was going to send a pull request for this along with my 3 patches Are you going to pull the 3 patches i sent yesterday or do you want a pull request my patches will result in more boards

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 V6] Move and rename common headers from under board/davinci.

2010-11-28 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Move the davinci common headers to the architecture specific include file path. Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu urwithsugh...@gmail.com --- Changes since V5 * Based off Ben Gardiner's tree, no changes in the patch .../arm/include/asm/arch-davinci/da8xx_common.h|0

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3 V6] Remove board_init_f function from nand_boot.c

2010-11-28 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Remove the board_init_f function from nand_spl/nand_boot.c. This function is to be defined by all boards using the nand_spl functionality in their individual board directory. Currently this function was being used by the smdk6400 board. Added the board specific function definition.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3 V6] Add board support for hawkboard

2010-11-28 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
The patch adds basic board support for TI's OMAP-L138 based Hawkboard. This board is pretty similar to the da850 EVM. Support for nand and network access is added in this version. The following bootup procedure is used. At reset, the Rom Boot Loader(RBL), initialises the ddr and the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AM3517:Fix for ARM Relocation support

2010-11-29 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
-Original Message- From: Hiremath, Vaibhav Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 9:52 PM To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: alb...@aribaud.net; Paulraj, Sandeep; Hiremath, Vaibhav Subject: [PATCH] AM3517:Fix for ARM Relocation support From: Vaibhav Hiremath hvaib...@ti.com Also

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-arm

2010-11-29 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
On 27.11.2010 08:43, Dirk Behme wrote: On 26.11.2010 21:55, Wolfgang Denk wrote: In message20101126202955.b087d11d9...@gemini.denx.de you wrote: The following changes since commit 6163f5b4c8873848ed023054bc401727301ea537: malloc: Fix issue with calloc memory possibly being

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ti/master

2010-11-29 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Wolfgang, Please pull this patch to your master. With this one more ARM board builds Thanks, Sandeep The following changes since commit d0d2271f8c62e830ec65fb069b6d12dd708e3e2f: Wolfgang Denk (1): Prepare v2010.12-rc2 are available in the git repository at:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMV7: OMAP3: Fix build failure for igep0030 machine

2010-11-29 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Seems that if CONFIG_CMD_NET is undefined we should also undefine CONFIG_CMD_NFS, otherwise build fails with various undefined reference like: net/libnet.o: In function `rpc_req': u-boot/net/nfs.c:193: undefined reference to `NetEthHdrSize' u-boot/net/nfs.c:202: undefined

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] omap3evm: Use GENERATED_GBL_DATA_SIZE

2010-11-29 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
The macro CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE has been replaced with GENERATED_GBL_DATA_SIZE. Also define macros: CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_ADDR and CONFIG_SYS_INIT_RAM_SIZE. Based on changes for omap3_beagle in the commit: 31bfcf1c5776df3d90286aa15104c45096d53dc6 Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Premi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AM3517:EMIF4: fix SDRAM size to 256Mb

2010-11-29 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
From: Vaibhav Hiremath hvaib...@ti.com With addition of dram_init_banksize() function from Heiko,Schocher (commit ID: 561142af20f1fd7b425d9425730014e656defb91), the DRAM size is getting configured wrongly to 512Mb (CS0 CS1). So fix it to 256Mb. Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AM3517:Build FIX: undef CONFIG_CMD_NFS support

2010-11-29 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
From: Vaibhav Hiremath hvaib...@ti.com Without CONFIG_CMD_NET support CONFIG_CMD_NFS leads to linking error, so disable CONFIG_CMD_NFS option. Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath hvaib...@ti.com --- include/configs/am3517_evm.h |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] AM3517:EMIF4: fix SDRAM size to 256Mb

2010-11-29 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
From: Vaibhav Hiremath hvaib...@ti.com With addition of dram_init_banksize() function from Heiko,Schocher (commit ID: 561142af20f1fd7b425d9425730014e656defb91), the DRAM size is getting configured wrongly to 512Mb (CS0 CS1). So fix it to 256Mb. Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3: SDP3430: Fix ARM relocation support

2010-11-29 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com --- Compile tested only. board/ti/sdp3430/config.mk |2 +- include/configs/omap3_sdp3430.h |6 ++ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Index: u-boot.git/board/ti/sdp3430/config.mk

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1 V7] Add board support for hawkboard

2010-11-30 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
The patch adds basic board support for TI's OMAP-L138 based Hawkboard. This board is pretty similar to the da850 EVM. Support for nand and network access is added in this version. The following bootup procedure is used. At reset, the Rom Boot Loader(RBL), initialises the ddr and the

[U-Boot] DA850 USB support

2010-11-30 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Looks like this patch got missed http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/71817/ It adds USB support for DA850 --Sandeep ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-arm (master + next)

2010-11-30 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
The following changes since commit d0d2271f8c62e830ec65fb069b6d12dd708e3e2f: Prepare v2010.12-rc2 (2010-11-28 19:48:11 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm.git master Dirk Behme (4): OMAP4: SDP4430: Disable CMD_NFS OMAP3:

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-arm (master + next)

2010-11-30 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Sorry, fixed. Am I missing something? No, this was my fault. Sorry. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk Thanks, I'll re base and send some more patches to unbreak some of the ARM boards. --Sandeep ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] DaVinci DM6446: Config Update

2010-12-05 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Albert, From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com The DM6446 does not build due to the ARM relocation patch. Also the board does not build in the NOR mode. Changed default to NAND to ensure no build failure. In the NOR mode, the build complained about a CONFIG variable not being

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] env_nand: Use nand_read_skip_bad instead of nand_read

2010-12-05 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
The nand-read function returns an error code if correctable errors have occurred. This is not desirable, since the errors have been corrected! This patch switches to the nand_read_skip_bad function which does not return an error code if the errors are correctable. Signed-off-by: Steve

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] omap3: emif|sdrc: use a single global data define

2010-12-11 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR declarations in functions are inherently troublesome with various compilers (e.g. gcc 4.5) Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon n...@ti.com --- Similar to the fix I did in: http://marc.info/?t=12880377354r=1w=2 for OMAP4 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/emif4.c |3

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/8] Add nand_spl support for TI OMAP Beagle

2010-12-28 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
This patch series adds the ability to boot a beagle board from nand without x-loader. A future addition will add mmc boot support. John Rigby (8): NAND: nand_spl/nand_boot.c: add 16-bit and readid support armv7: add nand_spl support OMAP3: and nand_spl support OMAP3: add

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8] armv7: cache maintenance operations

2010-12-28 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8] armv7: cache maintenance operations With D-cache and MMU enabled for ARM in u-boot it becomes imperative to support a minimal set of cache maintenance operations and necessary initializations before enabling MMU. This series of patches attempt to do the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: Update mach types

2010-12-28 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Hi Sandeep, Le 28/12/2010 22:43, s-paul...@ti.com a écrit : From: Sandeep Paulrajs-paul...@ti.com This commit updates the mach-types for ARM I assume these come straight from the ARM linux kernel sources? Amicalement, These are straight from the latest in Linus's tree.

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ti/master

2010-12-28 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Hi Sandeep, Le 29/12/2010 00:39, s-paul...@ti.com a écrit : Albert, Please pull u-boot-ti/master This pull request consists of an update to the ARM mach-types. Also added some fixes and minor enhancements to DaVinci support. Most of the patches are either in an internal TI tree

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] arm: Tegra2: Add support for NVIDIA Seaboard board Signed-off-by: Tom Warren twar...@nvidia.com

2011-01-11 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Hi Tom, Nice to see support for this board #define MACH_TYPE_TI8148EVM3004 #define MACH_TYPE_TEGRA_SEABOARD 3005 +#define MACH_TYPE_SEABOARD 3005 I don't think this is the way it is supposed to be done. Patches should not contain an addition to mach-types.h. What

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] arm: Tegra2: Add support for NVIDIA Seaboard board Signed-off-by: Tom Warren twar...@nvidia.com

2011-01-11 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
...@nvidia.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 7:43 PM To: Paulraj, Sandeep; Tom Warren; u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: RE: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] arm: Tegra2: Add support for NVIDIA Seaboard board Signed-off-by: Tom Warren twar...@nvidia.com Thanks, Sandeep. As I understand it, one of our Tegra2

[U-Boot] Compilation error when adding 4GB support in NAND driver

2009-06-04 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
The 4Gb support was added to the Linux MTD system sometime back and I am trying to add the same in U-Boot Basically I am referring to http://git.infradead.org/mtd-2.6.git?a=commit;h=69423d99fc182a81f3c5db3eb5c140acc6fc64be and I am adding the same stuff in the latest U-boot as I need to support

Re: [U-Boot] Compilation error when adding 4GB support in NAND driver

2009-06-04 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
JC, Is the 4GB support going to added in the u-boot-nand anytime soon? Thanks, Sandeep -Original Message- From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [mailto:plagn...@jcrosoft.com] Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 1:04 PM To: Paulraj, Sandeep Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Stefan Roese

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] DaVinci Network Driver Updates

2009-06-10 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Jean-Christophe, Has this been applied? It appears as if it has not been applied Thanks, Sandeep From: Ben Warren [mailto:biggerbadder...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2009 4:27 PM To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Cc: Paulraj, Sandeep; u-boot

[U-Boot] Possible bug in NAND driver

2009-07-13 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
If we refer to the following code snippet from nand_util.c rval = nand_read (nand, offset, read_length, p_buffer); if (rval != 0) { printf (NAND read from offset %llx failed %d\n, offset, rval);

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] TI: OMAP3: Overo Tobi ethernet support

2009-09-24 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Olof Johansson wrote: Add setup for ethernet on Tobi, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be loaded over tftp. Based on the omap3 evm code. I added a new highlevel define for Tobi to avoid having it dependent on CMD_NET (which would seem backward in this case). Signed-off-by: Olof

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] TI: OMAP3: Overo Tobi ethernet support

2009-09-24 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Olof Johansson wrote: Add setup for ethernet on Tobi, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be loaded over tftp. Based on the omap3 evm code. I added a new highlevel define for Tobi to avoid having it dependent on CMD_NET (which would seem backward in this case). Signed-off-by: Olof

Re: [U-Boot] Applying u-boot-ti patches (was: [PATCH v2] TI: OMAP3: Overo Tobi ethernet support)

2009-09-28 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: Olof Johansson wrote: Add setup for ethernet on Tobi, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be loaded over tftp. Based on the omap3 evm code. I added a new highlevel define for Tobi to avoid having it dependent on CMD_NET (which would seem backward in this case

Re: [U-Boot] Applying u-boot-ti patches

2009-09-28 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
in this case). Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net Ack-ed Sandeep, Can you push this to the ti branch? Tom Yes after I rebase the branch. I have to get rid of some commits NAK'ed by Wolfgang. Seems this is done :) Just in case it might help: After looking

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] TI: OMAP3: Overo Tobi ethernet support

2009-09-28 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Olof Johansson wrote: Add setup for ethernet on Tobi, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be loaded over tftp. This also refactors the smc911x driver to allow for detecting when the chip is missing. I.e. the detect_chip() function is called earlier and will abort gracefully when the Chip ID

Re: [U-Boot] About DM6467_config

2009-09-30 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Hello, Please describe configuration (make _config) of DM6467. Can I use the davinci_dvevm_config ? support for DM6467 does not exist yet. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] About DM6467_config

2009-09-30 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
hmmm...to bad...i planned to use a newer uboot version than the one delivered with my dm6467 (its v1.2). do you think there will be support any time soon? Yes. Others in TI are supposed to add the support. If they don't start I will start by adding the basic framework. and how far do

  1   2   3   4   >