if (ret)
> + goto exit_eerd;
> +
> + cmd = RV3032_EEPROM_CMD_READ;
> + ret = dm_i2c_write(dev, RV3032_EEPROM_CMD,
> +, 1);
> + if (ret)
> + goto exit_eerd;
> +
> obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_RV8803) += rv8803.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_RX8025) += rx8025.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rv3028.c b/drivers/rtc/rv3028.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00..8d8336c5f1
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rv3028.c
> &g
0 */
> >> +writel(0, REG_CFG(ICPU_INTR_ENA));
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_OCELOT
> >> +writel(~0, REG_CFG(ICPU_DST_INTR_MAP(0)));
> >> +writel(0, REG_CFG(ICPU_DST_INTR_MAP(1)));
> >> +writel(0, REG_CFG(ICPU_DST_INTR_MAP(2)));
>
IO) && !defined(CONFIG_SPL_BUILD)
> struct dw_spi_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev->parent);
> --
> 2.19.0
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
on an older version of the driver and you will be missing future fixes.
--
Alexandre Belloni
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
--
Alexandre Belloni
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
, do you have any numbers for QNX?
I didn't try that either.
Regards,
--
Alexandre Belloni
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
but it was not clearly stated
that using u-boot was mandatory in the first mail ;)
Anyway, last time I looked, SPL was not supported on i.mx6, is it now ?
--
Alexandre Belloni
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo
and probably won't be. Some people will argue
that you probably don't need a bootloader once you are able to boot a
linux kernel as you can probably do everything you want from there.
--
Alexandre Belloni
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:35:01PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote :
Dear Alexandre Belloni,
In message 20130219112532.gb24...@piout.net you wrote:
No, that is not supported and probably won't be. Some people will argue
I think you are wrong. This is definitely a not supported _yet_
://www.elinux.org/images/d/d1/Alexandre_Belloni_boottime_optimizations.pdf
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPU4_QVPFZ0
Regards,
--
Alexandre Belloni
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
at that bootloader (it is actually much
less than that):
https://github.com/alexandrebelloni/whoosh
It supports sabrelite and sabresd, it should be quite fast to port to
nitrogen6x. I can do it but I don't have access to the hardware...yet.
Regards,
--
Alexandre Belloni
Regards,
--
Alexandre Belloni
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
is:
bootstrap 0x
ubootenv 0x4200
uboot 0x8400
kernel 0x00084000
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.bell...@piout.net
---
Changes for v2:
- changed the layout as per Marek's recommendation
Changes for v3:
- prefixed the patch title with AT91SAM9*:
Changes for v4
dataflash and my rootfs is in NAND. The kernel is
around 1.7MiB using the default configuration. Maybe, we should also
extend its partition ?
Best regards
Andreas Bießmann
--
Alexandre Belloni
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http
Actually, the 9rlek, 9260ek and 9261ek have a 4MiB dataflash and the
9263ek doesn't have an embedded dataflash. I guess I'll change the
mapping to still get 2MiB for the kernel.
regards,
--
Alexandre Belloni
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http
.
Now, the layout is:
bootstrap 0x
ubootenv 0x4200
uboot 0x8400
kernel 0x00084000
fs 0x00294000
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.bell...@piout.net
---
Changes for v2:
- changed the layout as per Marek's recommendation
Changes for v3:
- prefixed the patch
.
It seems to be working well on my board. I'm really interested in
getting mainline working well.
I know there is not much interest in the AT91 boards now but I would
really like to see that issue fixed.
Regards,
--
Alexandre Belloni
___
U-Boot mailing
is:
bootstrap 0x
ubootenv 0x4200
uboot 0x8400
kernel 0x00084000
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.bell...@piout.net
---
Changes for v2:
- changed the layout as per Marek's recommendation
Changes for v3:
- prefixed the patch title with AT91SAM9*:
Changes for v4
is:
bootstrap 0x
ubootenv 0x4200
uboot 0x8400
kernel 0x00084000
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.bell...@piout.net
---
Changes for v2:
- changed the layout as per Marek's recommendation
Changes for v3:
- prefixed the patch title with AT91SAM9
shouldn't we reorder u-boot and its
env ?
Because it adds problems without any benefits.
When I looked the last time, the environment is only 8 pages,
So you can fit a redundant environment anyway in 16 kB+}
--
Alexandre Belloni
___
U-Boot
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:25:02PM +0100, Ulf Samuelsson wrote :
On 2012-02-20 17:40, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On at91sam platforms, u-boot grew larger than the allocated size in
dataflash, the layout was:
bootstrap 0x
ubootenv 0x4200
uboot 0x8400
kernel
less.
My board has 8MB of dataflash, I couldn't find what size is available on
other evaluation kits...
Regards,
--
Alexandre Belloni
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
is:
bootstrap 0x
uboot 0x4000
ubootenv 0x00084000
ubootenv2 0x00088000
kernel 0x0008C000
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.bell...@piout.net
---
include/configs/at91sam9260ek.h | 18 --
include/configs/at91sam9261ek.h | 18 --
include
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:46:58AM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote :
Hmm... With 8MByte FLASH the proposed mapping leaves 7+ MB for the
flashed kernel, which should be enough :) so that's ok.
Ok then, I just prefixed the patch title with AT91SAM9*:
Regards,
--
Alexandre Belloni
is:
bootstrap 0x
uboot 0x4000
ubootenv 0x00084000
ubootenv2 0x00088000
kernel 0x0008C000
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.bell...@piout.net
---
Changes for v2:
- changed the layout as per Marek's recommendation
Changes for v3:
- prefixed the patch title
is:
bootstrap 0x
uboot 0x4000
ubootenv 0x00084000
ubootenv2 0x00088000
kernel 0x0008C000
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.bell...@piout.net
---
include/configs/at91sam9260ek.h | 18 --
include/configs/at91sam9261ek.h | 18 --
include
is around 4k. I'll try a new layout and come back with a
proposal. I'll also check that it fits in most dataflash sizes.
--
Alexandre Belloni
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
0x44000 will make the
process easier for users using the default configuration but they'll
have to remember to flash the kernel at 0x44000.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni alexandre.bell...@piout.net
---
include/configs/at91sam9260ek.h |4 ++--
include/configs/at91sam9261ek.h |4
29 matches
Mail list logo
