Re: QEMU NUMA and U-Boot

2022-03-23 Thread François Ozog
Le mer. 7 juil. 2021 à 19:39, Heinrich Schuchardt a écrit : > > > On 7/7/21 5:15 PM, François Ozog wrote: > > top posting what now works for me: > > - changed calculation of memory size to loop through different memory > nodes > > - added numa_node to banks

Re: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fsl-layerscape: add dtb overlay feature

2022-01-05 Thread François Ozog
Hi Sahil, (and happy new year ;-) On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 at 07:09, Sahil Malhotra (OSS) < sahil.malho...@oss.nxp.com> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > -Original Message- > > From: Michael Walle > > Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2021 3:05 PM > > To: Sahil Malhotra (OSS) > > Cc: ZHIZHIKIN Andrey ;

Re: efi bootmenu

2021-12-29 Thread François Ozog
HI Simon On Wed, 29 Dec 2021 at 14:36, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi François, > > On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 at 03:15, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > > > > > Le mar. 28 déc. 2021 à 09:32, Simon Glass a écrit : > >> > >> Hi Masahisa, > >>

Re: efi bootmenu

2021-12-28 Thread François Ozog
Le mar. 28 déc. 2021 à 09:32, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi Masahisa, > > On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 00:37, Masahisa Kojima > wrote: > > > > Hi Takahiro, > > > > On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 at 11:47, Takahiro Akashi > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 06:25:05PM +0900, Masahisa Kojima wrote: > > >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] fsl-layerscape: add dtb overlay feature

2021-12-09 Thread François Ozog
Hi Michael Le lun. 29 nov. 2021 à 18:47, Michael Walle a écrit : > Hi Sahil, > > Am 2021-11-29 12:55, schrieb Sahil Malhotra (OSS): > > Am 2021-11-17 19:11, schrieb Sahil Malhotra (OSS): > >>> Could you please add some description what this is doing and for what > >>> this is intended? To have

Re: [PATCH v6 01/25] doc: Add documentation about devicetree usage

2021-12-07 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon On Mon, 6 Dec 2021 at 16:23, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi François, > > On Sat, 4 Dec 2021 at 18:15, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon > > > > Le sam. 4 déc. 2021 à 18:42, Simon Glass a écrit : > >> > >> Hi François, > &g

Re: [PATCH v7 14/31] arm: highbank: Add devicetree files

2021-12-07 Thread François Ozog
Hi On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 at 18:14, Andre Przywara wrote: > On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 09:21:40 -0700 > Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 at 09:14, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 09:09:54AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH v6 01/25] doc: Add documentation about devicetree usage

2021-12-04 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon Le sam. 4 déc. 2021 à 18:42, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi François, > > On Sat, 4 Dec 2021 at 04:06, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon > > > > Le sam. 4 déc. 2021 à 02:02, Simon Glass a écrit : > >> > >> Hi Heinrich, >

Re: [PATCH v6 00/25] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-12-04 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon Le sam. 4 déc. 2021 à 18:35, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi François, > > On Sat, 4 Dec 2021 at 09:55, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon > > > > Le sam. 4 déc. 2021 à 16:21, Simon Glass a écrit : > >> > >> Hi Tom,

Re: [PATCH v6 00/25] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-12-04 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon Le sam. 4 déc. 2021 à 16:21, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi Tom, > > On Sat, 4 Dec 2021 at 06:52, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 06:01:56PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > [huge snip] > > > > There's things that need to be cleaned up because we have some small > > > >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] binman: Add support for ATF Firmware Image Package (FIP)

2021-12-04 Thread François Ozog
> >> > >> I am Sandrine Bailleux, from the Trusted Firmware-A project. Ilias > >> Apalodimas CC'ed me on this thread. > >> > >> First of all, thanks for involving the TF-A developers in this thread > >> and my apologies for the delay in respondi

Re: [PATCH v6 01/25] doc: Add documentation about devicetree usage

2021-12-04 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon Le sam. 4 déc. 2021 à 02:02, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi Heinrich, > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 13:28, Heinrich Schuchardt > wrote: > > > > On 12/3/21 9:13 PM, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Heinrich, > > > > > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 06:09, Heinrich Schuchardt > wrote: > > >> > > >> On

Re: [PATCH v6 09/25] arm: xenguest_arm64: Add a fake devicetree file

2021-12-03 Thread François Ozog
Le ven. 3 déc. 2021 à 21:14, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi François, > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 10:03, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 17:04, Simon Glass wrote: > >> > >> Hi Tom, > >> > >> On Fri,

Re: [PATCH v6 09/25] arm: xenguest_arm64: Add a fake devicetree file

2021-12-03 Thread François Ozog
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 17:04, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 05:14, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 12:23:10PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi François, > > > > > > On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 11:44,

Re: [PATCH v6 00/25] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-12-02 Thread François Ozog
0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 09:59, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 09:49:51AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > &g

Re: [PATCH v6 09/25] arm: xenguest_arm64: Add a fake devicetree file

2021-12-02 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 19:29, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi François, > > On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 11:17, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon > > > > On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 19:05, Simon Glass wrote: > >> > >> Hi Tom,

Re: [PATCH v6 00/25] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-12-02 Thread François Ozog
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 19:15, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > From: Ilias Apalodimas > > Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 19:03:46 +0200 > > > > On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 18:38, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 05:33:53PM +0100, François Ozog wrote: >

Re: [PATCH v6 07/25] arm: rpi: Add a devicetree file for rpi_4

2021-12-02 Thread François Ozog
Hi Mark, On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 18:34, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > From: Simon Glass > > Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 08:59:01 -0700 > > > > Add this file, obtained from the Raspbian boot disk, so there is a > > reference devicetree in the U-Boot tree. The same one is used for > > 32- and 64-bit

Re: [PATCH v6 09/25] arm: xenguest_arm64: Add a fake devicetree file

2021-12-02 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 19:05, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 10:56, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 05:40:46PM +, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: > > > Hi, Simon! > > > > > > Sorry for being late to the party > > > > > > On 02.12.21 17:59,

Re: [PATCH v6 00/25] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-12-02 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon Le jeu. 2 déc. 2021 à 17:40, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi François, > > On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 at 09:34, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon > > > > Le jeu. 2 déc. 2021 à 17:00, Simon Glass a écrit : > >> > >> With Ilias' eff

Re: [PATCH v6 00/25] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-12-02 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon Le jeu. 2 déc. 2021 à 17:00, Simon Glass a écrit : > With Ilias' efforts we have dropped OF_PRIOR_STAGE and OF_HOSTFILE so > there are only three ways to obtain a devicetree: > >- OF_SEPARATE - the normal way, where the devicetree is built and > appended to U-Boot >-

Re: [PATCH 00/40] RFC: rpi: Enable ACPI booting on ARM with Raspberry Pi 4

2021-12-01 Thread François Ozog
Hi Le mer. 1 déc. 2021 à 18:16, Andy Shevchenko a écrit : > On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 6:56 PM Simon Glass wrote: > > > > At present in U-Boot ACPI tables are only generated for x86 devices. It > is > > possible to build them for ARM as well. That is the subject of this > > series. > > in the

Re: [PATCH 04/40] arm: Allow supporting ACPI-table generation

2021-12-01 Thread François Ozog
Hi Le mer. 1 déc. 2021 à 18:11, Tom Rini a écrit : > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 05:49:54PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > From: Simon Glass > > > Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 09:02:38 -0700 > > > > > > Some ARM boards are using ACPI now. It seems that U-Boot should support > > > this method. Add ARM

Re: [PATCH 0/2] binman: Add support for ATF Firmware Image Package (FIP)

2021-11-25 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon, On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 17:49, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi François, > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 08:11, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 15:47, Ilias Apalodimas < >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] binman: Add support for ATF Firmware Image Package (FIP)

2021-11-25 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon, On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 15:47, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > +cc Sandrine > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 11:42, Ilias Apalodimas > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 06:09, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > > > > This series adds support for the FIP format as used by

Re: [PATCH 00/16] tools: Add support for signing devicetree blobs

2021-11-13 Thread François Ozog
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 at 17:02, Heinrich Schuchardt > wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On 11/12/21 20:49, François Ozog wrote: > > >>> Hi Simon > > >>> > > >>> Le ven. 12 nov. 2021 à 20:36, Simon

Re: [PATCH 00/16] tools: Add support for signing devicetree blobs

2021-11-13 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon Le sam. 13 nov. 2021 à 14:57, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi François, > On Sat, 13 Nov 2021 at 03:18, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > Le sam. 13 nov. 2021 à 04:31, Simon Glass a écrit : > >> > >> Hi Heinrich, > >

Re: [PATCH 00/16] tools: Add support for signing devicetree blobs

2021-11-13 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon, Le sam. 13 nov. 2021 à 04:31, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi Heinrich, > > On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 at 17:02, Heinrich Schuchardt > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 11/12/21 20:49, François Ozog wrote: > > > Hi Simon > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/16] tools: Add support for signing devicetree blobs

2021-11-12 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon Le ven. 12 nov. 2021 à 20:36, Simon Glass a écrit : > At present mkimage supports signing FITs, the standard U-Boot image type. > > Various people are opposed to using FIT since: > just to be sure: I am not one of those. > > a) it requires adding support for FIT into other

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: add fdt_add_pubkey tool

2021-11-10 Thread François Ozog
Hi Jan Le mer. 10 nov. 2021 à 17:48, Jan Kiszka a écrit : > On 10.11.21 17:31, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Jan, > > > > On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 23:44, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> > >> On 10.11.21 01:58, Simon Glass wrote: > >>> Hi Jan, > >>> > >>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 03:07, Jan Kiszka > wrote: >

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: add fdt_add_pubkey tool

2021-11-09 Thread François Ozog
Hi Jan, On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 15:00, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 09.11.21 14:16, François Ozog wrote: > > Hi Jan > > > > On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 13:58, Jan Kiszka > <mailto:jan.kis...@siemens.com>> wrote: > > > > On 09.11.21 13:43, François Ozog

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: add fdt_add_pubkey tool

2021-11-09 Thread François Ozog
Hi Jan On Tue, 9 Nov 2021 at 13:58, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 09.11.21 13:43, François Ozog wrote: > > Hi > > > > as we are in design discussions, I would promote the idea of not pushing > > non hardware related things in the DTB that is passed to the kernel.

Re: [PATCH 0/2] RFC: add fdt_add_pubkey tool

2021-11-09 Thread François Ozog
Hi as we are in design discussions, I would promote the idea of not pushing non hardware related things in the DTB that is passed to the kernel. Is your use case to allow U-Boot to verify the kernel's signature ? Why not putting it into an environment variable? If your use case is on Arm or

Re: [PATCH 00/31] passage: Define a standard for firmware data flow

2021-11-08 Thread François Ozog
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 18:17, Simon Glass wrote: > ) to signal Hi François, > > On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 10:31, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > Le ven. 5 nov. 2021 à 17:12, Simon Glass a écrit : > >> > >> Hi François, > &g

Re: [PATCH 00/31] passage: Define a standard for firmware data flow

2021-11-05 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon, Le ven. 5 nov. 2021 à 17:12, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi François, > > On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 02:27, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 03:02, Simon Glass wrote: > >> > >> Hi François, > &g

Re: [PATCH 00/31] passage: Define a standard for firmware data flow

2021-11-05 Thread François Ozog
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 03:02, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi François, > > On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 10:03, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 15:59, Simon Glass wrote: > >> > >> Hi François, > &g

Re: [PATCH 1/1] sysreset: watchdog: watchdog cannot power off

2021-11-04 Thread François Ozog
Hi Heinrich, Le jeu. 4 nov. 2021 à 12:45, Heinrich Schuchardt < heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com> a écrit : > On 11/4/21 10:55, François Ozog wrote: > > Hi Heinrich, > > > > On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 10:31, Heinrich Schuchardt > > > <mailto:he

Re: [PATCH v5 06/26] arm: qemu: Add a devicetree file for qemu_arm64

2021-11-04 Thread François Ozog
Hi Peter Le jeu. 4 nov. 2021 à 12:41, Peter Maydell a écrit : > On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 11:22, François Ozog > wrote: > > Le jeu. 4 nov. 2021 à 12:09, Peter Maydell a > écrit : > >> > >> Well, our recommendation really was that the ideal thing would > >

Re: [PATCH v5 06/26] arm: qemu: Add a devicetree file for qemu_arm64

2021-11-04 Thread François Ozog
hi Peter Le jeu. 4 nov. 2021 à 12:09, Peter Maydell a écrit : > On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 14:41, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 06:29:20AM +0100, François Ozog wrote: > > [snip] > > > > 3. Anything else? > > > > > > > > F

Re: [PATCH 1/1] sysreset: watchdog: watchdog cannot power off

2021-11-04 Thread François Ozog
Hi Heinrich, On Thu, 4 Nov 2021 at 10:31, Heinrich Schuchardt < heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com> wrote: > The watchdog system reset driver can reboot the device but it cannot power > it off. If power off is requested, the driver should not reset the system > but leave powering off to one of

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-11-03 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon I don't know if this is correct etiquette but at this moment it feels just right to do this: The problem is not confusion it is that the patch set goes in a direction that makes no sense. On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 02:24, Simon Glass wrote: > With Ilias' efforts we have dropped

Re: [PATCH v5 06/26] arm: qemu: Add a devicetree file for qemu_arm64

2021-11-03 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon, and team On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 06:29, François Ozog wrote: > Hi Simon > > Le mer. 3 nov. 2021 à 02:30, Simon Glass a écrit : > >> Hi Tom, >> >> On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 11:28, Tom Rini wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 09

Re: [PATCH v5 06/26] arm: qemu: Add a devicetree file for qemu_arm64

2021-11-02 Thread François Ozog
Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 01, 2021 at 06:33:35PM +0100, François Ozog wrote: > > > > > Hi Simon > > > > > > > > > > Le lun. 1 nov. 2021 à 17:58, Simon Glass a > écrit : > > > > > &

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-11-02 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon Le mer. 3 nov. 2021 à 02:21, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi François, > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 14:07, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon > > > > Le mer. 27 oct. 2021 à 20:23, Simon Glass a écrit : > >> > >> Hi François,

Re: [PATCH 00/31] passage: Define a standard for firmware data flow

2021-11-02 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon, On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 15:59, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi François, > > On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 at 02:53, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > this seems a great endeavor. I'd like to better understand the scope of > it. > > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-11-02 Thread François Ozog
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 11:07, Michael Walle wrote: > Hi, > > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 at 05:51, Simon Glass wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 00:46, Ilias Apalodimas > > > wrote: > > .. > > > > Linux actually doesn't care if the U-Boot properties are in the tree, > > > so long as we have proper

Re: [PATCH 00/31] passage: Define a standard for firmware data flow

2021-11-01 Thread François Ozog
Hi Mark, Le lun. 1 nov. 2021 à 19:19, Mark Kettenis a écrit : > > From: François Ozog > > Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 09:53:40 +0100 > > [...] > > > We could further leverage Passage to pass Operating Systems parameters > that > > could be removed from device t

Re: [PATCH v5 06/26] arm: qemu: Add a devicetree file for qemu_arm64

2021-11-01 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon Le lun. 1 nov. 2021 à 17:58, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi Peter, > > On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 at 04:48, Peter Maydell > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 01:33, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > Add this file, generated from qemu, so there is a reference devicetree > > > in the U-Boot tree.

Re: [PATCH 00/31] passage: Define a standard for firmware data flow

2021-11-01 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon, this seems a great endeavor. I'd like to better understand the scope of it. Is it to be used as part of what could become a U-Boot entry ABI scheme? By that I mean giving some fixed aspects to U-Boot entry while letting boards to have flexibility (say for instance that the first 5

Re: [PATCH v5 02/26] doc: Add documentation about devicetree usage

2021-10-29 Thread François Ozog
t 21:33, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > Hi François, > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 09:38, François Ozog > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 16:13, Simon Gla

Re: [PATCH v2 00/41] Initial implementation of standard boot

2021-10-28 Thread François Ozog
Hi Tom Le jeu. 28 oct. 2021 à 20:27, Tom Rini a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 08:17:50PM +0200, François Ozog wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > Le jeu. 28 oct. 2021 à 19:59, Tom Rini a écrit : > > > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 06:50:02PM +0100, Peter Robinson

Re: [PATCH v2 00/41] Initial implementation of standard boot

2021-10-28 Thread François Ozog
Hi Tom, Le jeu. 28 oct. 2021 à 19:59, Tom Rini a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 06:50:02PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 6:47 PM Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 06:37:42PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 3:11 PM

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-28 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon Le jeu. 28 oct. 2021 à 17:44, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi François, > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 at 08:50, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon > > > > Le jeu. 28 oct. 2021 à 16:30, Simon Glass a écrit : > >> > >> Hi François,

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-28 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon Le jeu. 28 oct. 2021 à 16:30, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi François, > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 at 02:21, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > Le jeu. 28 oct. 2021 à 04:51, Simon Glass a écrit : > >> > >> Hi Ilias, &g

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-28 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon, Le jeu. 28 oct. 2021 à 04:51, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi Ilias, > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 00:46, Ilias Apalodimas > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > A bit late to the party, sorry! > > (Did you remember the beer? I am replying to this but I don't think it > is all that helpful for

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread François Ozog
Hi Tom Le mer. 27 oct. 2021 à 21:06, Tom Rini a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 06:02:19PM +0200, François Ozog wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 17:10, Mark Kettenis > wrote: > > > > > > From: François Ozog > > > > Da

Re: [PATCH v5 26/26] fdt: Don't call board_fdt_blob_setup() without OF_BOARD

2021-10-27 Thread François Ozog
Hi Tom Le mer. 27 oct. 2021 à 21:12, Tom Rini a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:17:05AM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 18:27, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > Hi Ilias, > > > > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 07:56, Ilias Apalodimas > > > wrote: > >

Re: [PATCH v5 02/26] doc: Add documentation about devicetree usage

2021-10-27 Thread François Ozog
Hi Tom Le mer. 27 oct. 2021 à 21:48, Tom Rini a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 05:38:28PM +0200, François Ozog wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 16:13, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > Hi François, > > > > > > On

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon Le mer. 27 oct. 2021 à 20:23, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi François, > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 09:14, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 16:08, Simon Glass wrote: > >> > >> Hi François, > >

Re: [PATCH v5 02/26] doc: Add documentation about devicetree usage

2021-10-27 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon, Le mer. 27 oct. 2021 à 20:33, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi François, > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 09:38, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 16:13, Simon Glass wrote: > >> > >> Hi François,

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread François Ozog
Hi Tom Le mer. 27 oct. 2021 à 20:06, Tom Rini a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 09:24:25AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 09:11, Mark Kettenis > wrote: > > > > > > > From: François Ozog > > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread François Ozog
Hi Mark, On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 17:10, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > From: François Ozog > > Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:15:01 +0200 > > > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 14:48, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at

Re: [PATCH v5 02/26] doc: Add documentation about devicetree usage

2021-10-27 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon, On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 16:13, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi François, > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 09:57, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 17:27, Simon Glass wrote: > >> > >> Hi François, > >

Re: [PATCH v2 00/41] Initial implementation of standard boot

2021-10-27 Thread François Ozog
Hi Heinrich, On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 13:38, Heinrich Schuchardt < heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > On 10/24/21 01:25, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > The bootflow feature provide a built-in way for U-Boot to automatically > > boot an Operating System without custom scripting and other >

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread François Ozog
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 16:08, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi François, > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 00:07, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon > > > > Position unchanged on this series: adding fake dts for boards that > generate their device tree in the dts di

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread François Ozog
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 15:38, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 03:30:18PM +0200, François Ozog wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 14:59, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 09:46:38AM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: >

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread François Ozog
Hi Tom, On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 14:59, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 09:46:38AM +0300, Ilias Apalodimas wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > > A bit late to the party, sorry! > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > I really want to see what the binary case looks like since we could > then > > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-27 Thread François Ozog
; > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 08:56, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:06:02PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > Hi François, > > > >

Re: [PATCH v5 02/26] doc: Add documentation about devicetree usage

2021-10-26 Thread François Ozog
On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 17:27, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi François, > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 08:31, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 02:25, Simon Glass wrote: > >> > >> At present some of the ideas and t

Re: [PATCH v5 02/26] doc: Add documentation about devicetree usage

2021-10-26 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon, On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 02:25, Simon Glass wrote: > At present some of the ideas and techniques behind devicetree in U-Boot > are assumed, implied or unsaid. Add some documentation to cover how > devicetree is build, how it can be modified and the rules about using > the various

Re: [PATCH v5 00/26] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-26 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon Position unchanged on this series: adding fake dts for boards that generate their device tree in the dts directory is not good. If you have them in documentation the it is acceptable. Cheers FF Le mar. 26 oct. 2021 à 02:24, Simon Glass a écrit : > With Ilias' efforts we have dropped

Re: [PATCH v4 03/11] efi_loader: capsule: add back efi_get_public_key_data()

2021-10-25 Thread François Ozog
Le lun. 25 oct. 2021 à 09:05, Masami Hiramatsu a écrit : > Hi Francois, > > 2021年10月25日(月) 15:28 François Ozog : > > > > > > > > Le lun. 25 oct. 2021 à 07:14, AKASHI Takahiro < > takahiro.aka...@linaro.org> a écrit : > >> > >>

Re: [PATCH v4 03/11] efi_loader: capsule: add back efi_get_public_key_data()

2021-10-25 Thread François Ozog
Le lun. 25 oct. 2021 à 07:14, AKASHI Takahiro a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 07:39:37AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Masami, > > > > On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 at 02:18, Masami Hiramatsu > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > 2021年10月15日(金) 9:40 Simon Glass : > > > > > > > > Hi

Re: [PATCH v4 03/11] efi_loader: capsule: add back efi_get_public_key_data()

2021-10-20 Thread François Ozog
Le mer. 20 oct. 2021 à 10:18, Masami Hiramatsu a écrit : > Hi Simon, > > 2021年10月15日(金) 9:40 Simon Glass : > > > > Hi Takahiro, > > > > On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 at 00:25, AKASHI Takahiro > wrote: > > > > > > The commit 47a25e81d35c ("Revert "efi_capsule: Move signature from DTB > to > > > .rodata"")

Re: please help, "Ram disk image is corrupt or invalid" (qemu virt machine, arm64)

2021-10-19 Thread François Ozog
Hi If you use the second argument to indicate the location of the initrd then Linux will use device tree information to get the size of the initrd. That information is probably absent or incorrect. The initrd= in your command line is thus useless as you task U-boot to load it. You may want to

Re: License: embed u-boot binary in FPGA bitstream

2021-10-19 Thread François Ozog
Hi Did you get an answer I missed ? There’s active discussion on DTB lifecycle. >From the Xilinx boards I am aware of, there is a Xilinx primary boot loader that then loads u-boot SPL and then U-Boot proper. My understanding is that you can attach the hardware description DTB with the

Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] doc: board: apple: Add Apple M1 documentation

2021-10-14 Thread François Ozog
Le jeu. 14 oct. 2021 à 22:44, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi Mark, > > On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 14:09, Mark Kettenis > wrote: > > > > > From: Simon Glass > > > Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:01:20 -0600 > > > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 10:40, Mark Kettenis > wrote: > > > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-14 Thread François Ozog
Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 20:06, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi François, > > On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 at 11:35, François Ozog > wrote: > > > > Hi Simon > > > > Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 16:49, Simon Glass a écrit : > >> > >> Hi Tom, Bin,François, &

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-14 Thread François Ozog
> > > Hi François, > > > > > > > > On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 at 11:35, François Ozog < > francois.o...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Simon > > > > > > > > > > Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 1

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-14 Thread François Ozog
-0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi François, > > > > > > > > On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 at 11:35, François Ozog < > francois.o...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Simon > > > > > > > > > > Le mer. 13 oct. 20

Re: how to run u-boot on qemu arm64 virt machine?

2021-10-14 Thread François Ozog
elect a platform that has one and check if it has enough memory (you may try to run U-Boot SPL). You need to know which chip has reponsibility to setup dram controller. > Thank you. > > Chan Kim > > > > *From:* Chan Kim > *Sent:* Thursday, October 14, 2021 12:03 PM >

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-13 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 16:49, Simon Glass a écrit : > Hi Tom, Bin,François, > > On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 at 19:34, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 09:29:14AM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 9:01 AM Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] RFC: doc: Add documentation about devicetree usage

2021-10-13 Thread François Ozog
Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 15:30, Tom Rini a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 03:12:02PM +0200, François Ozog wrote: > > Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 14:55, Tom Rini a écrit : > > > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 10:15:02AM +0200, François Ozog wrote: > > > > Le

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] RFC: doc: Add documentation about devicetree usage

2021-10-13 Thread François Ozog
Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 14:55, Tom Rini a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 10:15:02AM +0200, François Ozog wrote: > > Le sam. 18 sept. 2021 à 15:18, Tom Rini a écrit : > > > > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 03:38:45AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi, > &

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-13 Thread François Ozog
Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 14:42, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé a écrit : > Hi Simon, > > On 10/13/21 03:29, Bin Meng wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 9:01 AM Simon Glass wrote: > >> > >> With Ilias' efforts we have dropped OF_PRIOR_STAGE and OF_HOSTFILE so > >> there are only three ways to obtain a

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-13 Thread François Ozog
Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 14:41, Heinrich Schuchardt < heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com> a écrit : > > > On 10/13/21 03:01, Simon Glass wrote: > > With Ilias' efforts we have dropped OF_PRIOR_STAGE and OF_HOSTFILE so > > there are only three ways to obtain a devicetree: > > > > - OF_SEPARATE -

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-13 Thread François Ozog
Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 14:41, Andre Przywara a écrit : > On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 19:01:04 -0600 > Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi, > > > With Ilias' efforts we have dropped OF_PRIOR_STAGE and OF_HOSTFILE so > > there are only three ways to obtain a devicetree: > > > >- OF_SEPARATE - the normal way,

Re: [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option

2021-10-13 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 03:35, Tom Rini a écrit : > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 09:29:14AM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 9:01 AM Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > With Ilias' efforts we have dropped OF_PRIOR_STAGE and OF_HOSTFILE so > > > there are only

Re: how to run u-boot on qemu arm64 virt machine?

2021-10-13 Thread François Ozog
Hi You can find work in progress here too: http://releases.linaro.org/components/ledge/rp-0.2/ledge-multi-armv8/ For aarch64 there are virt and sbsa-ref machines. Virt is essentially to boot a VM while sbsa-ref is a reference platform that mimics all required hardware, firmware for the secure

Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] RFC: doc: Add documentation about devicetree usage

2021-10-13 Thread François Ozog
Le sam. 18 sept. 2021 à 15:18, Tom Rini a écrit : > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 03:38:45AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 16:44, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 12:09:40AM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > > Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 17:17:37

Re: [PATCH 07/16] arm: rpi: Add a devicetree file for rpi_4

2021-10-12 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon This is making a clean environment go in the wrong direction. I have witnessed that bus to mmio changed for instance, have seen patches to patch live u-boot embedded DT because it does not do the work that Videocore does. The Videocore handles that properly so why adding this? Si i

Re: [PATCH 10/16] arm: octeontx: Add a fake devicetree file

2021-10-12 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon It’s even in the title! The idea of having a DT in dts for ALL boards is not properly rooted. You may add some sample dts with warnings in the doc tree though. Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 03:04, Simon Glass a écrit : > Add an empty file to prevent build errors when building with >

Re: [PATCH 02/16] arm: qemu: Explain how to extract the generate devicetree

2021-10-12 Thread François Ozog
Le mer. 13 oct. 2021 à 03:02, Simon Glass a écrit : > QEMU currently generates a devicetree for use with U-Boot. Explain how to > obtain it. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass > --- > > doc/board/emulation/qemu-arm.rst | 12 > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git

Re: [PATCH 05/16] arm: qemu: Add a devicetree file for qemu_arm64

2021-10-12 Thread François Ozog
Hi Simon The only place I could agree with this file presence is in the documentation directory, not in dts. It creates a mental picture for the reader an entirely bad mind scheme around Qemu and DT. And even in a documentation directory I would place a bug warning: don’t use this with any

Re: Driver model at UEFI runtime

2021-09-30 Thread François Ozog
Le ven. 1 oct. 2021 à 00:00, Michael Walle a écrit : > > With SystemReady, DT from distros are ignored. > > Err? Is this really true, I know about some incompatible changes > to the device tree which prevents you from using usb (or even a > kernel panic) with the imx8mm

Re: Driver model at UEFI runtime

2021-09-30 Thread François Ozog
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 18:25, Michael Walle wrote: > Am 2021-09-30 17:47, schrieb François Ozog: > > On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 17:12, Michael Walle wrote: > > > >> [adding Vladimir, because he showed interest in this, too] > >> > >> Am 2021-09-30 15:5

Re: Driver model at UEFI runtime

2021-09-30 Thread François Ozog
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 17:12, Michael Walle wrote: > [adding Vladimir, because he showed interest in this, too] > > Am 2021-09-30 15:56, schrieb François Ozog: > > On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 14:07, Michael Walle wrote: > > > >> Am 2021-09-30 12:50, schrieb He

Re: Driver model at UEFI runtime

2021-09-30 Thread François Ozog
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 14:07, Michael Walle wrote: > Am 2021-09-30 12:50, schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt: > > Am 30. September 2021 11:53:47 MESZ schrieb Michael Walle > > : > >> Am 2021-09-30 08:56, schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt: > >>> On

Re: Driver model at UEFI runtime

2021-09-30 Thread François Ozog
Le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 à 08:38, Bin Meng a écrit : > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 2:23 PM François Ozog > wrote: > >> >> >> Le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 à 07:12, Bin Meng a écrit : >> >>> Hi Heinrich, >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:1

Re: Driver model at UEFI runtime

2021-09-30 Thread François Ozog
Le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 à 07:12, Bin Meng a écrit : > Hi Heinrich, > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 7:16 PM Heinrich Schuchardt > wrote: > > > > Hello Simon, > > > > The EBBR specification requires that the UEFI SystemReset() runtime > > service is available to the operating system. > > > > Up to now

  1   2   >