Hi Bin,
On 27 January 2015 at 23:02, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Bin,
>>
>> On 27 January 2015 at 07:00, Bin Meng wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
The base address is found in a d
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Bin,
>
> On 27 January 2015 at 07:00, Bin Meng wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> The base address is found in a different way and the protection bit is also
>>> in a different plac
Hi Bin,
On 27 January 2015 at 07:00, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> The base address is found in a different way and the protection bit is also
>> in a different place. Otherwise it is very similar.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
>> ---
Hi Simon,
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> The base address is found in a different way and the protection bit is also
> in a different place. Otherwise it is very similar.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
> ---
>
> drivers/spi/ich.c | 56
> ++
The base address is found in a different way and the protection bit is also
in a different place. Otherwise it is very similar.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
---
drivers/spi/ich.c | 56 ---
drivers/spi/ich.h | 11 ++-
2 files changed, 47
5 matches
Mail list logo
