Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/7] sunxi: arm64: correct usage of DT node address in FIT generation

Hi Simon, thanks for going through this! On 19/12/17 04:24, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Andre, > > On 3 December 2017 at 19:05, Andre Przywara wrote: >> The DT spec demands a unit-address in a node name to match the "reg" >> property in that node. Newer dtc versions will

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/7] sunxi: arm64: correct usage of DT node address in FIT generation

Hi Simon, thanks for going through this! On 19/12/17 04:24, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Andre, > > On 3 December 2017 at 19:05, Andre Przywara wrote: >> The DT spec demands a unit-address in a node name to match the "reg" >> property in that node. Newer dtc versions will

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/7] sunxi: arm64: correct usage of DT node address in FIT generation

Hi Simon, thanks for going through this! On 19/12/17 04:24, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Andre, > > On 3 December 2017 at 19:05, Andre Przywara wrote: >> The DT spec demands a unit-address in a node name to match the "reg" >> property in that node. Newer dtc versions will

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/7] sunxi: arm64: correct usage of DT node address in FIT generation

Hi Andre, On 3 December 2017 at 19:05, Andre Przywara wrote: > The DT spec demands a unit-address in a node name to match the "reg" > property in that node. Newer dtc versions will throw warnings if this is > not the case. > Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/7] sunxi: arm64: correct usage of DT node address in FIT generation

The DT spec demands a unit-address in a node name to match the "reg" property in that node. Newer dtc versions will throw warnings if this is not the case. Adjust the FIT build script for 64-bit Allwinner boards to remove the bogus addresses from the node names and avoid the warnings. This avoids