Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] imls: Add support to list images in NAND device

2012-12-17 Thread Vipin Kumar

On 12/15/2012 12:29 AM, Scott Wood wrote:

On 12/14/2012 03:23:26 AM, Vipin Kumar wrote:

On 12/14/2012 3:22 AM, Scott Wood wrote:

On 12/13/2012 12:10:58 AM, Vipin Kumar wrote:

+   imgdata = malloc(read_size);
+   if (!imgdata) {
+   printf(Not able to list all
images  \
+   (Low memory)\n);


Don't line-wrap error strings.



80 column ?


Error strings are an exception for the sake of greppability.  From
Linux's Documentation/CodingStyle:

 Statements longer than 80 columns will be broken into sensible
chunks, unless
 exceeding 80 columns significantly increases readability and does
not hide
 information. Descendants are always substantially shorter than
the
parent and
 are placed substantially to the right. The same applies to
function
headers
 with a long argument list. However, never break user-visible
strings
such as
 printk messages, because that breaks the ability to grep for
them.



Yes, thanks for reminding. The error strings are more readable
already in v3. Please take a look


No, you're still breaking up strings (and you also have a totally
unnecessary backslash).  If it's on one line in the output, it should
be on one line in the source.



Yes, got it. Please check v4. I will send it out soon


-Scott



___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] imls: Add support to list images in NAND device

2012-12-14 Thread Vipin Kumar

On 12/14/2012 3:22 AM, Scott Wood wrote:

On 12/13/2012 12:10:58 AM, Vipin Kumar wrote:

Or better, just have one CONFIG_CMD_IMLS and have it operate on
whatever flash types are configured into U-Boot.



I didn't do it because until now the CONFIG_CMD_IMLS config is
tightly bound with flash only eg config_cmd_default.h enables
CONFIG_CMD_IMLS only when CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH is not defined. I
thought there might be other places as well


Still, it might be better to fix that than to build upon a
no-longer-accurate assumption.



OK, I would try that in v4


+#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_IMLS_NAND)
+static void do_imls_nand(void)
+{
+   nand_info_t *nand;
+   int nand_dev = nand_curr_device;
+   size_t read_size;
+   loff_t off;
+   u8 buffer[512];


Why 512?



Basically there are 2 image types supported as of today.
  * Legacy: 64 byte header
  * FIT:  512 byte header

After reading the first 512 bytes from each block of NAND, we try to
validate the header and only if the header validation is successful,
we malloc the space for the whole image and read the image into it


Do you really need 512 bytes for fdt_check_header() to work?



I have reduced it already to 64 bytes in v3


+   nand =nand_info[nand_dev];
+   if (!nand-name || !nand-size)
+   continue;
+
+   for (off = 0; off   nand-size; off += nand-erasesize)
{
+   int ret;
+   void *imgdata;
+
+   if (nand_block_isbad(nand, off))
+   goto next_block;
+
+   read_size = sizeof(buffer);
+
+   ret = nand_read(nand, off,read_size, buffer);
+   if (ret   0   ret != -EUCLEAN)
+   goto next_block;


s/goto next_block/continue/



hmmm, OK.
I copied the original code ie for listing images from nor flash.
Should I also correct it !!


If you want to do that as a separate patch, that's fine -- but the code
is sufficiently different that I don't think there's a strong
consistency argument to be made.



Check if it is OK in v3


+   header = (const image_header_t *)buffer;
+
+   switch (genimg_get_format(buffer)) {
+   case IMAGE_FORMAT_LEGACY:
+   if (!image_check_hcrc(header))
+   goto next_block;
+
+   read_size =
image_get_image_size(header);
+
+   imgdata = malloc(read_size);
+   if (!imgdata) {
+   printf(Not able to list all
images  \
+   (Low memory)\n);


Don't line-wrap error strings.



80 column ?


Error strings are an exception for the sake of greppability.  From
Linux's Documentation/CodingStyle:

Statements longer than 80 columns will be broken into sensible
chunks, unless
exceeding 80 columns significantly increases readability and does
not hide
information. Descendants are always substantially shorter than the
parent and
are placed substantially to the right. The same applies to function
headers
with a long argument list. However, never break user-visible strings
such as
printk messages, because that breaks the ability to grep for them.



Yes, thanks for reminding. The error strings are more readable already 
in v3. Please take a look



Why is the no-memory error message different for FIT versus legacy
images?  I realize that at this point you don't know if it's a FIT
versus some other dtb, but why do you print the device and offset
here
but not in the legacy case?  Why Low memory(cannot allocate memory
for
image) versus just  (Low memory)?



Typo :(
I would give the following print for both
printf(May be a FIT Image at NAND  \
device %d offset %08llX:\n,
nand_dev, off);
printf(   Low memory(cannot allocate \
 memory for image)\n);


It's a little more verbose than I'd have done, but OK.  Can you put a
space between memory and (cannot, though?



Sure. I will do that in v4

-Vipin
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] imls: Add support to list images in NAND device

2012-12-14 Thread Scott Wood

On 12/14/2012 03:23:26 AM, Vipin Kumar wrote:

On 12/14/2012 3:22 AM, Scott Wood wrote:

On 12/13/2012 12:10:58 AM, Vipin Kumar wrote:

+   imgdata = malloc(read_size);
+   if (!imgdata) {
+   printf(Not able to list all
images  \
+   (Low memory)\n);


Don't line-wrap error strings.



80 column ?


Error strings are an exception for the sake of greppability.  From
Linux's Documentation/CodingStyle:

Statements longer than 80 columns will be broken into sensible
chunks, unless
exceeding 80 columns significantly increases readability and does
not hide
information. Descendants are always substantially shorter than  
the

parent and
are placed substantially to the right. The same applies to  
function

headers
with a long argument list. However, never break user-visible  
strings

such as
printk messages, because that breaks the ability to grep for  
them.




Yes, thanks for reminding. The error strings are more readable  
already in v3. Please take a look


No, you're still breaking up strings (and you also have a totally  
unnecessary backslash).  If it's on one line in the output, it should  
be on one line in the source.


-Scott
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] imls: Add support to list images in NAND device

2012-12-13 Thread Scott Wood

On 12/13/2012 12:10:58 AM, Vipin Kumar wrote:

Or better, just have one CONFIG_CMD_IMLS and have it operate on
whatever flash types are configured into U-Boot.



I didn't do it because until now the CONFIG_CMD_IMLS config is  
tightly bound with flash only eg config_cmd_default.h enables  
CONFIG_CMD_IMLS only when CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH is not defined. I  
thought there might be other places as well


Still, it might be better to fix that than to build upon a  
no-longer-accurate assumption.



+#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_IMLS_NAND)
+static void do_imls_nand(void)
+{
+   nand_info_t *nand;
+   int nand_dev = nand_curr_device;
+   size_t read_size;
+   loff_t off;
+   u8 buffer[512];


Why 512?



Basically there are 2 image types supported as of today.
 * Legacy: 64 byte header
 * FIT:  512 byte header

After reading the first 512 bytes from each block of NAND, we try to  
validate the header and only if the header validation is successful,  
we malloc the space for the whole image and read the image into it


Do you really need 512 bytes for fdt_check_header() to work?


+   nand =nand_info[nand_dev];
+   if (!nand-name || !nand-size)
+   continue;
+
+   for (off = 0; off  nand-size; off += nand-erasesize)
{
+   int ret;
+   void *imgdata;
+
+   if (nand_block_isbad(nand, off))
+   goto next_block;
+
+   read_size = sizeof(buffer);
+
+   ret = nand_read(nand, off,read_size, buffer);
+   if (ret  0  ret != -EUCLEAN)
+   goto next_block;


s/goto next_block/continue/



hmmm, OK.
I copied the original code ie for listing images from nor flash.
Should I also correct it !!


If you want to do that as a separate patch, that's fine -- but the code  
is sufficiently different that I don't think there's a strong  
consistency argument to be made.



+   header = (const image_header_t *)buffer;
+
+   switch (genimg_get_format(buffer)) {
+   case IMAGE_FORMAT_LEGACY:
+   if (!image_check_hcrc(header))
+   goto next_block;
+
+   read_size =
image_get_image_size(header);
+
+   imgdata = malloc(read_size);
+   if (!imgdata) {
+   printf(Not able to list all
images  \
+   (Low memory)\n);


Don't line-wrap error strings.



80 column ?


Error strings are an exception for the sake of greppability.  From  
Linux's Documentation/CodingStyle:


  Statements longer than 80 columns will be broken into sensible  
chunks, unless
  exceeding 80 columns significantly increases readability and does  
not hide
  information. Descendants are always substantially shorter than the  
parent and
  are placed substantially to the right. The same applies to function  
headers
  with a long argument list. However, never break user-visible strings  
such as

  printk messages, because that breaks the ability to grep for them.


Why is the no-memory error message different for FIT versus legacy
images?  I realize that at this point you don't know if it's a FIT
versus some other dtb, but why do you print the device and offset  
here
but not in the legacy case?  Why Low memory(cannot allocate memory  
for

image) versus just  (Low memory)?



Typo :(
I would give the following print for both
printf(May be a FIT Image at NAND  \
device %d offset %08llX:\n,
nand_dev, off);
printf(   Low memory(cannot allocate \
 memory for image)\n);


It's a little more verbose than I'd have done, but OK.  Can you put a  
space between memory and (cannot, though?


-Scott
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] imls: Add support to list images in NAND device

2012-12-12 Thread Vipin Kumar
imls does not list the images in NAND devices. This patch implements this
support for legacy type images.

Signed-off-by: Vipin Kumar vipin.ku...@st.com
---
Hello Scott,

There has been sometime since you reviewed the first version of this patch.
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-November/139631.html

I am sorry for a late response on this. I was waiting for other comments if any
on the whole patch-set

Regards
Vipin

 README |   3 +-
 common/cmd_bootm.c | 133 -
 2 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/README b/README
index 2077c3b..ec5c31e 100644
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -831,7 +831,8 @@ The following options need to be configured:
CONFIG_CMD_I2C  * I2C serial bus support
CONFIG_CMD_IDE  * IDE harddisk support
CONFIG_CMD_IMIiminfo
-   CONFIG_CMD_IMLS   List all found images
+   CONFIG_CMD_IMLS   List all images found in flash
+   CONFIG_CMD_IMLS_NAND  List all images found in NAND device
CONFIG_CMD_IMMAP* IMMR dump support
CONFIG_CMD_IMPORTENV* import an environment
CONFIG_CMD_INI  * import data from an ini file into the 
env
diff --git a/common/cmd_bootm.c b/common/cmd_bootm.c
index d256ddf..8ee562a 100644
--- a/common/cmd_bootm.c
+++ b/common/cmd_bootm.c
@@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ extern flash_info_t flash_info[]; /* info for FLASH chips */
 static int do_imls(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[]);
 #endif
 
+#include linux/err.h
+#include nand.h
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE
 static void fixup_silent_linux(void);
 #endif
@@ -1175,7 +1178,7 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
 /* imls - list all images found in flash */
 /***/
 #if defined(CONFIG_CMD_IMLS)
-static int do_imls(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[])
+static void do_imls_flash(void)
 {
flash_info_t *info;
int i, j;
@@ -1224,6 +1227,134 @@ next_sector:;
}
 next_bank: ;
}
+}
+#endif
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_IMLS_NAND)
+static void do_imls_nand(void)
+{
+   nand_info_t *nand;
+   int nand_dev = nand_curr_device;
+   size_t read_size;
+   loff_t off;
+   u8 buffer[512];
+   const image_header_t *header = (const image_header_t *)buffer;
+
+   /* the following commands operate on the current device */
+   if (nand_dev  0 || nand_dev = CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE) {
+   puts(\nNo NAND devices available\n);
+   return;
+   }
+
+   printf(\n);
+
+   for (nand_dev = 0; nand_dev  CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE; nand_dev++) {
+
+   nand = nand_info[nand_dev];
+   if (!nand-name || !nand-size)
+   continue;
+
+   for (off = 0; off  nand-size; off += nand-erasesize) {
+   int ret;
+   void *imgdata;
+
+   if (nand_block_isbad(nand, off))
+   goto next_block;
+
+   read_size = sizeof(buffer);
+
+   ret = nand_read(nand, off, read_size, buffer);
+   if (ret  0  ret != -EUCLEAN)
+   goto next_block;
+
+   header = (const image_header_t *)buffer;
+
+   switch (genimg_get_format(buffer)) {
+   case IMAGE_FORMAT_LEGACY:
+   if (!image_check_hcrc(header))
+   goto next_block;
+
+   read_size = image_get_image_size(header);
+
+   imgdata = malloc(read_size);
+   if (!imgdata) {
+   printf(Not able to list all images  \
+   (Low memory)\n);
+   goto next_block;
+   }
+
+   ret = nand_read_skip_bad(nand, off, read_size,
+   imgdata);
+   if (ret  0  ret != -EUCLEAN) {
+   free(imgdata);
+   goto next_block;
+   }
+
+   printf(Legacy Image at NAND device %d  \
+   offset %08llX:\n, nand_dev, off);
+   image_print_contents(imgdata);
+
+   puts(   Verifying Checksum ... );
+   if (!image_check_dcrc(imgdata))
+   puts(Bad Data CRC\n);
+   else
+   puts(OK\n);
+
+   

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] imls: Add support to list images in NAND device

2012-12-12 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Vipin Kumar,

In message 
dba14c4ffef38a108f75342968bcd9ce2b75c4c7.1355303894.git.vipin.ku...@st.com 
you wrote:
 imls does not list the images in NAND devices. This patch implements this
 support for legacy type images.
...
 -static int do_imls(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[])
 +static void do_imls_flash(void)

Why is this void?  Should we not return error codes? Or at least be
able to?

 +static void do_imls_nand(void)

Ditto.


Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk  Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
Far back in the mists of ancient time, in the great and glorious days
of the former Galactic Empire, life was wild, rich  and  largely  tax
free. - Douglas Adams, _The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy_
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] imls: Add support to list images in NAND device

2012-12-12 Thread Scott Wood

On 12/12/2012 03:20:24 AM, Vipin Kumar wrote:
imls does not list the images in NAND devices. This patch implements  
this

support for legacy type images.

Signed-off-by: Vipin Kumar vipin.ku...@st.com
---
Hello Scott,

There has been sometime since you reviewed the first version of this  
patch.

http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-November/139631.html

I am sorry for a late response on this. I was waiting for other  
comments if any

on the whole patch-set

Regards
Vipin

 README |   3 +-
 common/cmd_bootm.c | 133  
-

 2 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/README b/README
index 2077c3b..ec5c31e 100644
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -831,7 +831,8 @@ The following options need to be configured:
CONFIG_CMD_I2C  * I2C serial bus support
CONFIG_CMD_IDE  * IDE harddisk support
CONFIG_CMD_IMIiminfo
-   CONFIG_CMD_IMLS   List all found images
+   CONFIG_CMD_IMLS   List all images found in flash
+		CONFIG_CMD_IMLS_NAND	  List all images found in NAND  
device


s/in flash/in NOR flash/
s/in NAND device/in NAND flash/

Or better, just have one CONFIG_CMD_IMLS and have it operate on  
whatever flash types are configured into U-Boot.



CONFIG_CMD_IMMAP* IMMR dump support
CONFIG_CMD_IMPORTENV* import an environment
 		CONFIG_CMD_INI		* import data from an ini file  
into the env

diff --git a/common/cmd_bootm.c b/common/cmd_bootm.c
index d256ddf..8ee562a 100644
--- a/common/cmd_bootm.c
+++ b/common/cmd_bootm.c
@@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ extern flash_info_t flash_info[]; /* info for FLASH  
chips */
 static int do_imls(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *  
const argv[]);

 #endif

+#include linux/err.h
+#include nand.h
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE
 static void fixup_silent_linux(void);
 #endif
@@ -1175,7 +1178,7 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
 /* imls - list all images found in flash */
 /***/
 #if defined(CONFIG_CMD_IMLS)
-static int do_imls(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *  
const argv[])

+static void do_imls_flash(void)


s/flash/nor/


 {
flash_info_t *info;
int i, j;
@@ -1224,6 +1227,134 @@ next_sector:;
}
 next_bank: ;
}
+}
+#endif
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_IMLS_NAND)
+static void do_imls_nand(void)
+{
+   nand_info_t *nand;
+   int nand_dev = nand_curr_device;
+   size_t read_size;
+   loff_t off;
+   u8 buffer[512];


Why 512?


+   const image_header_t *header = (const image_header_t *)buffer;
+
+   /* the following commands operate on the current device */
+   if (nand_dev  0 || nand_dev = CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE) {
+   puts(\nNo NAND devices available\n);
+   return;
+   }


following commands, plural?

And this command seems to operate on all devices, not just the current  
one.



+
+   printf(\n);
+
+	for (nand_dev = 0; nand_dev  CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE;  
nand_dev++) {

+


Don't put a blank line inside braces at the beginning/end of blocks.


+   nand = nand_info[nand_dev];
+   if (!nand-name || !nand-size)
+   continue;
+
+		for (off = 0; off  nand-size; off += nand-erasesize)  
{

+   int ret;
+   void *imgdata;
+
+   if (nand_block_isbad(nand, off))
+   goto next_block;
+
+   read_size = sizeof(buffer);
+
+   ret = nand_read(nand, off, read_size, buffer);
+   if (ret  0  ret != -EUCLEAN)
+   goto next_block;


s/goto next_block/continue/


+   header = (const image_header_t *)buffer;
+
+   switch (genimg_get_format(buffer)) {
+   case IMAGE_FORMAT_LEGACY:
+   if (!image_check_hcrc(header))
+   goto next_block;
+
+read_size =  
image_get_image_size(header);

+
+   imgdata = malloc(read_size);
+   if (!imgdata) {
+	printf(Not able to list all  
images  \

+   (Low memory)\n);


Don't line-wrap error strings.


+   goto next_block;
+   }
+
+ret = nand_read_skip_bad(nand, off,  
read_size,

+   imgdata);
+   if (ret  0  ret != -EUCLEAN) {
+   free(imgdata);
+   goto next_block;
+   }


s/goto next_block/break/g

...or better, factor the switch out to its own function.


+
+

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] imls: Add support to list images in NAND device

2012-12-12 Thread Vipin Kumar

On 12/13/2012 1:54 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:

Dear Vipin Kumar,

In 
messagedba14c4ffef38a108f75342968bcd9ce2b75c4c7.1355303894.git.vipin.ku...@st.com
  you wrote:

imls does not list the images in NAND devices. This patch implements this
support for legacy type images.

...

-static int do_imls(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char * const argv[])
+static void do_imls_flash(void)


Why is this void?  Should we not return error codes? Or at least be
able to?



Yes, I agree. I would change this


+static void do_imls_nand(void)


Ditto.


Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk



___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] imls: Add support to list images in NAND device

2012-12-12 Thread Vipin Kumar


[...]



  README |   3 +-
  common/cmd_bootm.c | 133
-
  2 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/README b/README
index 2077c3b..ec5c31e 100644
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -831,7 +831,8 @@ The following options need to be configured:
CONFIG_CMD_I2C  * I2C serial bus support
CONFIG_CMD_IDE  * IDE harddisk support
CONFIG_CMD_IMIiminfo
-   CONFIG_CMD_IMLS   List all found images
+   CONFIG_CMD_IMLS   List all images found in flash
+   CONFIG_CMD_IMLS_NAND  List all images found in NAND
device


s/in flash/in NOR flash/
s/in NAND device/in NAND flash/



OK


Or better, just have one CONFIG_CMD_IMLS and have it operate on
whatever flash types are configured into U-Boot.



I didn't do it because until now the CONFIG_CMD_IMLS config is tightly 
bound with flash only eg config_cmd_default.h enables CONFIG_CMD_IMLS 
only when CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH is not defined. I thought there might be 
other places as well



CONFIG_CMD_IMMAP* IMMR dump support
CONFIG_CMD_IMPORTENV* import an environment
CONFIG_CMD_INI  * import data from an ini file
into the env
diff --git a/common/cmd_bootm.c b/common/cmd_bootm.c
index d256ddf..8ee562a 100644
--- a/common/cmd_bootm.c
+++ b/common/cmd_bootm.c
@@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ extern flash_info_t flash_info[]; /* info for FLASH
chips */
  static int do_imls(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *
const argv[]);
  #endif

+#includelinux/err.h
+#includenand.h
+
  #ifdef CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE
  static void fixup_silent_linux(void);
  #endif
@@ -1175,7 +1178,7 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
  /* imls - list all images found in flash */
  /***/
  #if defined(CONFIG_CMD_IMLS)
-static int do_imls(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc, char *
const argv[])
+static void do_imls_flash(void)


s/flash/nor/



OK


  {
flash_info_t *info;
int i, j;
@@ -1224,6 +1227,134 @@ next_sector:;
}
  next_bank:;
}
+}
+#endif
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_IMLS_NAND)
+static void do_imls_nand(void)
+{
+   nand_info_t *nand;
+   int nand_dev = nand_curr_device;
+   size_t read_size;
+   loff_t off;
+   u8 buffer[512];


Why 512?



Basically there are 2 image types supported as of today.
 * Legacy: 64 byte header
 * FIT:  512 byte header

After reading the first 512 bytes from each block of NAND, we try to 
validate the header and only if the header validation is successful, we 
malloc the space for the whole image and read the image into it



+   const image_header_t *header = (const image_header_t *)buffer;
+
+   /* the following commands operate on the current device */
+   if (nand_dev  0 || nand_dev= CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE) {
+   puts(\nNo NAND devices available\n);
+   return;
+   }


following commands, plural?



I think its a copy paste error


And this command seems to operate on all devices, not just the current
one.



Yes, that's why a copy paste


+
+   printf(\n);
+
+   for (nand_dev = 0; nand_dev  CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE;
nand_dev++) {
+


Don't put a blank line inside braces at the beginning/end of blocks.



OK


+   nand =nand_info[nand_dev];
+   if (!nand-name || !nand-size)
+   continue;
+
+   for (off = 0; off  nand-size; off += nand-erasesize)
{
+   int ret;
+   void *imgdata;
+
+   if (nand_block_isbad(nand, off))
+   goto next_block;
+
+   read_size = sizeof(buffer);
+
+   ret = nand_read(nand, off,read_size, buffer);
+   if (ret  0  ret != -EUCLEAN)
+   goto next_block;


s/goto next_block/continue/



hmmm, OK.
I copied the original code ie for listing images from nor flash.
Should I also correct it !!


+   header = (const image_header_t *)buffer;
+
+   switch (genimg_get_format(buffer)) {
+   case IMAGE_FORMAT_LEGACY:
+   if (!image_check_hcrc(header))
+   goto next_block;
+
+   read_size =
image_get_image_size(header);
+
+   imgdata = malloc(read_size);
+   if (!imgdata) {
+   printf(Not able to list all
images  \
+   (Low memory)\n);


Don't line-wrap error strings.



80 column ?


+   goto next_block;
+   }
+
+   ret =