Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/5] tools: kwbimage: don't adjust for image_header for Armada MSYS

2019-02-18 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Chris, On 18.02.19 23:23, Chris Packham wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 8:13 PM Stefan Roese wrote: Hi Chris, On 15.02.19 23:49, Chris Packham wrote: For the time being the Armada MSYS SoCs need to use the bin_hdr from the Marvell U-Boot. Because of this the binary.0 does not contain the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/5] tools: kwbimage: don't adjust for image_header for Armada MSYS

2019-02-18 Thread Chris Packham
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 8:13 PM Stefan Roese wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > On 15.02.19 23:49, Chris Packham wrote: > > For the time being the Armada MSYS SoCs need to use the bin_hdr from the > > Marvell U-Boot. Because of this the binary.0 does not contain the image > > header that a proper u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/5] tools: kwbimage: don't adjust for image_header for Armada MSYS

2019-02-17 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Chris, On 15.02.19 23:49, Chris Packham wrote: For the time being the Armada MSYS SoCs need to use the bin_hdr from the Marvell U-Boot. Because of this the binary.0 does not contain the image header that a proper u-boot SPL would so the adjustment introduced by commit 94084eea3bd3 ("tools:

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/5] tools: kwbimage: don't adjust for image_header for Armada MSYS

2019-02-15 Thread Chris Packham
For the time being the Armada MSYS SoCs need to use the bin_hdr from the Marvell U-Boot. Because of this the binary.0 does not contain the image header that a proper u-boot SPL would so the adjustment introduced by commit 94084eea3bd3 ("tools: kwbimage: Fix dest addr") does not apply.