Hi Chris,
On 18.02.19 23:23, Chris Packham wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 8:13 PM Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi Chris,
On 15.02.19 23:49, Chris Packham wrote:
For the time being the Armada MSYS SoCs need to use the bin_hdr from the
Marvell U-Boot. Because of this the binary.0 does not contain the
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 8:13 PM Stefan Roese wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> On 15.02.19 23:49, Chris Packham wrote:
> > For the time being the Armada MSYS SoCs need to use the bin_hdr from the
> > Marvell U-Boot. Because of this the binary.0 does not contain the image
> > header that a proper u-boot
Hi Chris,
On 15.02.19 23:49, Chris Packham wrote:
For the time being the Armada MSYS SoCs need to use the bin_hdr from the
Marvell U-Boot. Because of this the binary.0 does not contain the image
header that a proper u-boot SPL would so the adjustment introduced by
commit 94084eea3bd3 ("tools:
For the time being the Armada MSYS SoCs need to use the bin_hdr from the
Marvell U-Boot. Because of this the binary.0 does not contain the image
header that a proper u-boot SPL would so the adjustment introduced by
commit 94084eea3bd3 ("tools: kwbimage: Fix dest addr") does not apply.
4 matches
Mail list logo